Leakage of information to innocent suspects

Memory Detection: Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 187-199

  Bradley, M T ^a   Barefoot, Clair A ^b   Arsenault, Andrea M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867059963     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511975196.011     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Ben-Shakhar, G., and Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the guilty knowledge test: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (1), 131-151.
2. Ben-Shakhar, G., Gronau, N., and Elaad, E. (1999). Leakage of relevant information to innocent examinees in the CIT: an attempt to reduce false positive outcomes by introducing target stimuli. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (5), 651-666.
3. Bond Jr., C. F., and DePaulo, B. M. (2006) Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 (3), 214-234
4. Bradley, M. T., and Ainsworth, D. (1984). Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21 (1), 63-71.
5. Bradley, M. T., and Barefoot, C. A. (2010). Eliciting information from groups: social information and the guilty knowledge test. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science 42(2), 109-15.
6. Bradley, M. T., and Rettinger, J. (1992). Awareness of crime relevant information and the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (1), 55-59.
7. Bradley, M. T., and Warfield, J. F. (1984). Innocence, Information and the CIT in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21 (6), 683-689.
8. Bradley, M. T., Fleming, I., and MacDonald, P. (1989). Amnesia, feeling of knowing and the Guilty Knowledge Test. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21 (2), 224-231.
9. Bradley, M. T., MacLaren, V. V., and Carle, S. B. (1996). Deception and non-deception in Guilty Knowledge and Guilty Actions Polygraph Tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (2), 153-160.
10. Elaad, E. (2009). Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71 (3), 225-234.
11. Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Stimulus novelty and significance as determinants of electrodermal responsivity: the serial position effect. Psychophysiology, 26 (1), 29-38.
12. Furedy, J. J., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). The roles of deception, intention to deceive, and motivation to avoid detection in the psychophysiological detection of guilty knowledge. Psychophysiology, 28 (2), 163-171.
13. Gamer, M., Godert, H. W., Keth, A., Rill, H.-G., and Vossel, G. (2008). Electrodermal and phasic heart rate responses in the guilty actions test: comparing guilty examinees to informed and uninformed innocents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 69, 61-68.
14. Giesen, M., and Rollison, M. A. (1980). Guilty Knowledge vs innocent associations: effects of trait anxiety and stimulus context on skin conductance. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 1-11.
15. Honts, C. R., and Amato, S. L. (2002). Countermeasures. In M. Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing. San Diego: Academic Press.
16. Horneman, C. J., and O ' Gorman, J. G. (1985). Detectability in the card test as a function of the subject's verbal response. Psychophysiology, 3 (2), 330-333.
17. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43 (6), 385-388.
18. Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. The American Psychologist, 9 (10), 725-739.
19. Lykken, D. T. (1981). A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (4), 674-683.
21. Nakayama, M. (2002). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In M. Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing (pp. 49-86). San Diego: Academic Press.
22. Sato, T., and Nihie, Y. (2009). Sex differences in beliefs about cues to deception. Psychological Reports, 104, 759-769.
23. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the Conditioned Refl ex. New York: Macmillan.
24. Stern, R. M., Breen, J. P., Watanabe, T., and Perry, B. S. (1981). Effect of feedback of physiological information on responses to innocent associations and guilty knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66 (6), 677-681.
25. Verschuere, B., and Crombez, G. (2008). Déjà vu! The effect of previewing test items on the validity of the Concealed Information Test. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 14, 287-297.
26. Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., De Clercq, A., and Koster, E. (2004). Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating defensive and orienting responses. Psychophysiology, 41, 461-466.