High levels of wheel running protect against behavioral sensitization to cocaine

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 237, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 82-85

  Renteria Diaz, Laura ^a   Siontas, Dora ^a   Mendoza, Jose ^a   Arvanitogiannis, Andreas ^a  

^a Concordia University ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

Exercise; Individual differences; Locomotor sensitization; Physical activity; Rat; Stimulant drugs

Indexed keywords

COCAINE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR DELTA FOSB;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BRAIN PROTECTION; BRAIN REGION; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEUS ACCUMBENS; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; RAT; RUNNING; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIZATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COCAINE; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITORS; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84867049649     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Post R.M., Rose H. Increasing effects of repetitive cocaine administration in the rat. Nature 1976, 260:731-732.
2. Pascoli V., Turiault M., Lüscher C. Reversal of cocaine-evoked synaptic potentiation resets drug-induced adaptive behaviour. Nature 2011, 481:71-75.
3. Robinson T.E., Kolb B. Structural plasticity associated with exposure to drugs of abuse. Neuropharmacology 2004, 47:33-46.
4. Nestler E.J. Transcriptional mechanisms of addiction: role of DeltaFosB. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 2008, 363:3245-3255.
5. Hu M., Becker J.B. Effects of sex and estrogen on behavioral sensitization to cocaine in rats. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23:693-699.
6. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 1989, 245:1511-1513.
7. Arvanitogiannis A., Sullivan J., Amir S. Time acts as a conditioned stimulus to control behavioral sensitization to amphetamine in rats. Neuroscience 2000, 101:1-3.
8. Aguilar-Valles A., Flores C., Luheshi G.N. Prenatal inflammation-induced hypoferremia alters dopamine function in the adult offspring in rat: relevance for Schizophrenia. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e10967.
9. Yetnikoff L., Arvanitogiannis A. A role for affect in context-dependent sensitization to amphetamine. Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 119:1678-1681.
10. Belke T.W., Wagner J.P. The reinforcing property and the rewarding aftereffect of wheel running in rats: a combination of two paradigms. Behavioural Processes 2005, 68:165-172.
11. Greenwood B.N., Foley T.E., Le T.V., Strong P.V., Loughridge A.B., Day H.E., et al. Long-term voluntary wheel running is rewarding and produces plasticity in the mesolimbic reward pathway. Behavioural Brain Research 2011, 217:354-362.
12. Lett B.T., Grant V.L., Byrne M.J., Koh M.T. Pairings of a distinctive chamber with the aftereffect of wheel running produce conditioned place preference. Appetite 2000, 34:87-94.
13. Tzschentke T.M. Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Progress in Neurobiology 1998, 56:613-672.
14. Wise R.A. Brain reward circuitry. Neuron 2002, 36:229-240.
15. Werme M., Messer C., Olson L., Gilden L., Thorén P., Nestler E.J., et al. Delta FosB regulates wheel running. Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 22:8133-8138.
16. Smith M.A., Schmidt K.T., Iordanou J.C., Mustroph M.L. Aerobic exercise decreases the positive-reinforcing effects of cocaine. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2008, 98:129-135.
17. García-Capdevila S., Portell-Cortés I., Torras-Garcia M., Coll-Andreu M., Costa-Miserachs D. Effects of long-term voluntary exercise on learning and memory processes: dependency of the task and level of exercise. Behavioural Brain Research 2009, 202:162-170.
18. Ferreira A., Lamarque S., Boyer P., Perez-Diaz F., Jouvent R., Cohen-Salmon C. Spontaneous appetence for wheel-running: a model of dependency on physical activity in rat. European Psychiatry 2006, 21:580-588.
19. Burghardt P.R., Pasumarthi R.K., Wilson M.A., Fadel J. Alterations in fear conditioning and amygdalar activation following chronic wheel running in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 2006, 84:306-312.
20. Waters R.P., Renner K.J., Pringle R.B., Summers C.H., Britton S.L., Koch L.G., et al. Selection for aerobic capacity affects corticosterone, monoamines and wheel-running activity. Physiology and Behavior 2008, 93:1044-1054.
21. Hattori S., Naoi M., Nishino H. Striatal dopamine turnover during treadmill running in the rat: relation to the speed of running. Brain Research Bulletin 1994, 35:41-49.
22. Freed C.R., Yamamoto B.K. Regional brain dopamine metabolism: a marker for the speed, direction, and posture of moving animals. Science 1985, 229:62-65.
23. Rhodes J.S., Gammie S.C., Garland T. Neurobiology of mice selected for high voluntary wheel-running activity. Integrative and Comparative Biology 2005, 45:438-455.
24. Sabeti J., Gerhardt G.A., Zahniser N.R. Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization in low and high cocaine locomotor-responding rats are associated with differential inhibition of dopamine clearance in nucleus accumbens. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 2003, 305:180-190.
25. Kelz M.B., Chen J., Carlezon W.A, Whisler K., Gilden L., Beckmann A.M., et al. Expression of the transcription factor deltaFosB in the brain controls sensitivity to cocaine. Nature 1999, 401:272-276.