What Comes First? The Paradigm or the Approach?

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 255-257

  Mertens, Donna M ^a  

^a GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867021359     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689812461574     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Biesta G.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 95-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:95-117.
2. Denzin N. K.Triangulation 2.0.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2012;6 (2): 80-88.
3. Freshwater D.,Cahill J.Why write?.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2012;6 (3): 151-153.
4. Greene J.,Hall J.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 119-143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:119-143.
5. Guba E.,Lincoln Y. S.Fourth paradigm evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1989:.
6. Guba E.,Lincoln Y. S.The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluence. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Denzin N. K.Lincoln Y. S., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:191-215.
7. Johnson B.,Gray R.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). A history of philosophical and theoretical issues for mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 69-94). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:69-94.
8. Johnson R. B.,Onwuegbuzie A.Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come.Educational Research. 2004;33 (7): 14-26.
9. Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions. 1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1962:.
10. Mertens D. M.Transformative research and evaluation. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2009:.
11. Mertens D. M.,Bledsoe K. L.,Sullivan M.,Wilson A.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. 2010). Utilization of mixed methods for transformative purposes. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 193-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Tashakkori A.Teddlie C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010:193-214.
12. Mertens D. M.,Wilson A.Program evaluation theory and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2012:.