Are there differences between behavioral measurement methods? A comparison of the predictive validity of two ratings methods in a working dog program

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 141, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 158-172

  Wilsson, Erik ^a,b   Sinn, David L ^c,d  

^a Swedish Armed Forces Dog Training Center   (Sweden)

^b Department of Psychology ^*  (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Behavior test; Behavioral ratings; Predictive validity; Subjective ratings; Working dogs

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CANID; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA INTERPRETATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL THEORY; PREDICTION; RANKING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; TESTING METHOD; TRAINING;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 84867021307     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.08.012     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Block J. The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research 1961, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
2. Bräm M., Doherr M.G., Lehmann D., Mills D., Steiger A. Evaluating aggressive behavior in dogs: a comparison of 3 tests. J. Vet. Behav.: Clin. Appl. Res. 2008, 3:152-160.
3. Budaev S.V. Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: caveats and guidelines. Ethology 2010, 116:472-480.
4. Cattell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Social. Method. Res. 1966, 1:245-276.
5. De Meester R.H., De Bacquer D., Peremans K., Vermeire S., Planta D.J., Coopman F., Audenaert K. A preliminary study on the use of the socially acceptable behavior test as a test for shyness/confidence in the temperament of dogs. J. Vet. Behav.: Clin. Appl. Res. 2008, 3:161-170.
6. Diederich C., Giffroy J.-M. Behavioural testing in dogs: a review of methodology in search for standardization. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006, 97:51-72.
7. Epstein S. Aggregation and beyond: some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. J. Pers. 1983, 51:360-392.
8. Epstein S. The stability of behavior across time and situations. Personality and the Prediction of Behavior 1984, 209-268. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. R. Zucker, J. Arnoff, A.I. Rabin (Eds.).
9. Goddard M.E., Beilharz R.G. Early prediction of adult behaviour in potential guide dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1986, 15:247-260.
10. Goldberg L.R., Digman J.M. Revealing structure in the data: principles of exploratory factor analysis. Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality 1994, 216-242. Springer, New York. S. Strack, M. Lorr (Eds.).
11. Gorsuch R.L. Factor Analysis 1983, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. 2nd ed.
12. Gosling S.D. Personality dimensions in spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). J. Comp. Psychol. 1998, 112:107-118.
13. Gosling S.D. From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research?. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 127:45-86.
14. Gosling S.D., Kwan S.Y., John O.P. A dog's got personality: a cross-species comparative approach to evaluating personality judgements. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85:1161-1169.
15. Gosling S.D., Vazire S. Are we barking up the right tree? Evaluating a comparative approach to personality. J. Res. Pers. 2002, 36:607-614.
16. Graham L.T., Gosling S.D. Temperament and personality in working dogs. Canine Ergonomics: The Science of Working Dogs 2009, 63-81. CRC Press, New York. W.S. Helton (Ed.).
17. Haverbeke A., De Smet A., Depiereux E., Giffroy J.M., Diedrerich C. Assessing undesired aggression in military working dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 117:55-62.
18. Hewson C.J., Luescher U.A., Ball R.O. Measuring change in the behavioral severity of canine compulsive disorder: the construct validity of categories of change derived from two rating scales. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 60:55-68.
19. Hsu Y., Serpell J.A. Development and validation of a questionnaire for measuring behavior and temperament traits in pet dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2003, 223:1293-1300.
20. Humphrey E.S." Mental tests" for shepherd dogs. J. Hered. 1934, 25:129-136.
21. John O.P., Soto C.J. The importance of being valid. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology 2007, 461-494. The Guilford Press, New York. R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, R. Krueger (Eds.).
22. Jones A.C., Gosling S.D. Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): a review and evaluation of past research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 95:1-53.
23. Ley J.M., Bennett P.C., Coleman G.J. A refinement and validation of the Monash canine personality questionnaire (MCPQ). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 116:220-227.
24. Lorenzo-Seva U., ten Barge J.M.F. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2006, 2:57-64.
25. Maejima M., Inoue-Murayama M., Tonosaki K., Matsuura N., Kato S., Saito Y., Weiss A., Murayama Y., Ito S. Traits and genotypes may predict the successful training of drug detection dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 107:287-298.
26. Martin P., Bateson P. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide 1993, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed.
27. Martínek Z., Lát J., Hartl K. About the possibility of predicting performance of adult guard dogs from early behaviour. Activ. Nerv. Super. 1971, 13:149-150.
28. McCrae R.R., Zonderman A.B., Costa P.T., Bond M.H., Paunonen S.V. Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 70:552-566.
29. Netto W.J., Planta D.J.U. Behavioral testing for aggression in the domestic dog. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 52:243-263.
30. Pike N. Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2011, 2:278-282.
31. Pfaffenberger J.C., Scott J.P., Fuller J.L., Ginsburg B.E., Bielfelt A.W. Guide Dogs for the Blind: Their Selection Development and Training 1976, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
32. Rooney N.J., Gaines S.A., Bradshaw J.W.S., Penman S. Validation of a method for assessing the ability of trainee specialist search dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 103:90-104.
33. Ruefenacht S., Gebhard-Heinrich S., Miyake T., Gaillard C. A behaviour test on German shepherd dogs: heritability of seven different traits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 79:113-132.
34. Saetre P., Strandberg E., Sundgren P.-E., Pettersson U., Jazin E., Bergström T.F. The genetic contribution to canine personality. Genes Brain Behav. 2006, 5:240-248.
35. Sih A., Bell A.M., Johnson J.C., Ziemba R.E. Behavioral syndromes: an integrative overview. Q. Rev. Biol. 2004, 79:242-277.
36. Sinn D.L., Gosling S.D., Hilliard S. Personality and performance in military working dogs: reliability and predictive validity of behavioral tests. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010, 127:51-65.
37. Slabbert J.M., Odendaal J.S.J. Early prediction of adult police dog efficiency - a longitudinal study. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 64:269-288.
38. Svartberg K. Shyness-boldness predicts performance in working dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 79:157-174.
39. Svartberg K., Forkman B. Personality traits in the domestic dog. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 79:133-155.
40. Svartberg K., Tapper I., Temrin H., Radesäter T., Thorman S. Consistency of personality traits in dogs. Anim. Behav. 2005, 69:283-291.
41. Svartberg K. Individual differences in behaviour - dog personality. The Behavioural Biology of Dogs. 2007, 182-206. CAB International, Cambridge, MA. P. Jensen (Ed.).
42. SWGDOG. Retrieved January 11, 2012 at: http://www.swgdog.org/.
43. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 1996, Harper Collins, New York. 3rd ed.
44. Taylor K.D., Mills D.S. The development and assessment of temperament tests for adult companion dogs. J. Vet. Behav: Clin. Appl. Res. 2006, 1:94-108.
45. Uher J., Asendorpf J.B. Personality assessment in the great apes: comparing ecologically valid behavior measures, behavior ratings, and adjective ratings. J. Res. Pers. 2008, 42:821-838.
46. Vazire S., Gosling S.D., Dickey A.S., Schaprio S.J. Measuring personality in nonhuman animals. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology 2007, 190-206. New York: Guilford, Guilford, New York. R.W. Robins, R.C. Fraley, R. Krueger (Eds.).
47. van den Berg L., Schilder M., de Vries H., Leegwater P., van Oost B. Phenotyping of aggressive behavior in golden retriever dogs with a questionnaire. Behav. Genet. 2006, 36:882-902.
48. van der Borg J.A.M., Beerda B., Ooms M., De Souza A.S., van Hagen Kemp B. Evaluating of behaviour testing for human directed aggression in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010, 128:78-90.
49. van der Waaij E.H., Wilsson E., Strandberg E. Genetic analysis of a Swedish behavior test on German shepherd dogs and Labrador retrievers. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:2853-2861.
50. Willis M.B. Genetic aspects of dog behaviour with particular reference to working ability. The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People 1995, 51-64. Cambridge University Press, New York. J.A. Serpell (Ed.).
51. Wilsson E., Sundgren P.-E. The use of a behavior test for the selection of dogs for service and breeding: I. Methods of testing and evaluating test results in the adult dog, demands on different kinds of service dogs, sex and breed differences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 53:279-295.
52. Wilsson E., Sundgren P.-E. The use of a behaviour test for selection of dogs for service and breeding: II. Heritability for tested parameters and selection of dogs for service and breeding. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 54:235-241.
53. Yoccoz N.G. Use, overuse, and misuse of significance tests in evolutionary biology and ecology. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 1991, 72:106-111.
54. Zwick W.R., Velicer W.F. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol. Bull. 1986, 99:432-442.