Personality and performance in military working dogs: Reliability and predictive validity of behavioral tests

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 127, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 51-65

  Sinn, David L ^a,c   Gosling, Samuel D ^a   Hilliard, Stewart ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b USAF   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Behavioral instrument; Military dog; Personality; Predictive validity; Reliability

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; CANID; CERTIFICATION; DATA SET; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; MILITARY APPLICATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RANGE SIZE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

UNITED STATES;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 77957126840     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Beerda B., Schilder M.B.H., van Hooff J.A.R.A.M., de Vries H.W. Manifestations of chronic and acute stress in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 52:307-319.
2. Bell A.M., Hankison S.J., Laskowski K.L. The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 2009, 77:771-783.
3. Benus R.F., Koolhaas J.M., van Oortmerssen G.A. Individual differences in behavioural reaction to a changing environment in mice and rats. Behaviour 1987, 100:105-122.
4. Cattell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Sociol. Meth. Res. 1966, 1:245-276.
5. Champness K.A. Development of a Breeding Program for Drug Detector Dogs: Based on Studies of a Breeding Population of Guide Dogs 1996, Department of Agriculture and Resource Management, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
6. Draper T.W. Canine analogs of human personality factors. J. Gen. Psychol. 1995, 122:241-252.
7. Field A. Discovering Statistics using SPSS 2005, Sage Publications, London. second ed.
8. Fuchs T., Gaillard C., Gebhardt-Henrich S., Ruefenacht S., Steiger A. External factors and reproducibility of the behaviour test in German shepherd dogs in Switzerland. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 94:287-301.
9. Goddard M.E., Beilharz R.G. Genetic and environmental factors affecting the suitability of dogs as guide dogs for the blind. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1982, 62:97-102.
10. Goddard M.E., Beilharz R.G. Genetics of traits which determine the suitability of dogs as guide-dogs for the blind. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 1983, 9:299-315.
11. Goddard M.E., Beilharz R.G. A factor analysis of fearfulness in potential guide dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1984, 12:253-265.
12. Goddard M.E., Beilharz R.G. Individual variation in agonistic behaviour in dogs. Anim. Behav. 1985, 33:1338-1342.
13. Goddard M.E., Beilharz R.G. Early prediction of adult behavior in potential guide dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1986, 15:247-260.
14. Goldberg L.R., Digman J.M. Revealing the structure in the data: Principles of exploratory factor analysis. Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality 1994, 216-242. Springer, New York. S. Strack, M. Lorr (Eds.).
15. Gorsuch R.L. Factor Analysis 1983, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. second ed.
16. Gosling S.D. From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research?. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 127:45-86.
17. Gosling S.D., Kwan V.S.Y., John O.P. A dog's got personality: a cross-species comparative approach to evaluating personality judgements in dogs and humans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 85:1161-1169.
18. Graham L.T., Gosling S.D. Temperament and personality in working dogs. Canine Ergonomics: The Science of Working Dogs 2009, 63-81. CRC Press, New York. W.S. Helton (Ed.).
19. Haverbeke A., De Smet A., Depiereux E., Giffroy J.M., Diederich C. Assessing undesired aggression in military working dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 117:55-62.
20. Helton W.S. Canine Ergonomics: the Science of Working Dogs 2009, CRC Press, New York.
21. Hennessy M.B., Voith V.L., Mazzei S.J., Buttram J., Miller D.D., Linden F. Behavior and cortisol levels of dogs in a public animal shelter, and an exploration of the ability of these measures to predict problem behavior after adoption. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2001, 73:217-233.
22. John O.P., Robins R.W. Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. J. Pers. 1993, 61:521.
23. Jones A.C., Gosling S.D. Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): a review and evaluation of past research. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 95:1-53.
24. Kaminski J., Bräuer J., Call J., Tomasello M. Domestic dogs are sensitive to a human's perspective. Behaviour 2009, 146:979-998.
25. Keiichi T., Tucker D. Responsiveness of the olfactory receptor cells in dog to some odors. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 1985, 81:7-13.
26. Koolhaas J.M., Korte S.M., De Boer S.F., Van Der Vegt B.J., Van Reenen C.G., Hopster H., De Jong I.C., Ruis M.A.W., Blokhuis H.J. Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neuro. Biobehav. Rev. 1999, 23:925-935.
27. Ley J., Bennett P., Coleman G. Personality dimensions that emerge in companion canines. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2008, 110:305-317.
28. Ley J.M., McGreevy P., Bennett P.C. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Monash Canine Personality Questionnaire-Revised (MCPQ-R). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 119:85-90.
29. Lit L. Evaluating learning tasks commonly applied in detection dog training. Canine Ergonomics: The Science of Working Dogs 2009, 99-114. CRC Press, London. W.S. Helton (Ed.).
30. Lorenzo-Seva U., ten Berge J.M.F. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2006, 2:57-64.
31. Maejima M., Inoue-Murayama M., Tonosaki K., Matsuura N., Kato S., Saito Y., Weiss A., Murayama Y., Ito S.I. Traits and genotypes may predict the successful training of drug detection dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 107:287-298.
32. McCrae R.R., Zonderman A.B., Bond M.H., Costa P.T., Paunonen S.V. Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Am. Psych. Assoc. 1996, 552-566.
33. Moulton D.G., Marshall D.A. Quantitative analysis of nasal air-flow in the dog during sniffing. Am. Zoologist 1979, 19:864.
34. Netto W.J., Planta D.J.U. Behavioural testing for aggression in the domestic dog. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 52:243-263.
35. Rooney N.J., Bradshaw J.W.S., Almey H. Attributes of specialist search dogs-a questionnaire survey of UK dog handlers and trainers. J. Forensic Sci. 2004, 49:300-306.
36. Rooney N.J., Gaines S.A., Bradshaw J.W.S., Penman S. Validation of a method for assessing the ability of trainee specialist search dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2007, 103:90-104.
37. Rooney N., Gaines S., Hiby E. A practitioner's guide to working dog welfare. J. Vet. Behav.: Clin. Appl. Res. 2009, 4:127-134.
38. Ruefenacht S., Gebhardt-Henrich S., Miyake T., Gaillard C. A behaviour test on German Shepherd dogs: heritability of seven different traits. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 79:113-132.
39. Shrout P.E., Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 1979, 86:420-428.
40. Slabbert J.M., Odendaal J.S.J. Early prediction of adult police dog efficiency-a longitudinal study. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999, 64:269-288.
41. Svartberg K. Shyness-boldness predicts performance in working dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 79:157-174.
42. Svartberg K. A comparison of behaviour in test and in everyday life: evidence of three consistent boldness-related personality traits in dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2005, 91:103-128.
43. Svartberg K., Forkman B. Personality traits in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002, 79:133-155.
44. Svartberg K., Tapper I., Temrin H., Radesäter T., Thorman S. Consistency of personality traits in dogs. Anim. Behav. 2005, 69:283-291.
45. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 1996, HarperCollins, New York.
46. van der Borg J.A.M., Netto W.J., Planta D.J.U. Behavioral testing of dogs in animal shelters to predict problem behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991, 32:237-251.
47. Wells D.L. Sensory stimulation as environmental enrichment for captive animals: a review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009, 118:1-11.
48. Wilsson E., Sundgren P.-E. The use of a behaviour test for selection of dogs for service and breeding. II. Heritability for tested parameters and effect of selection based on service dog characteristics. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 54:235-241.
49. Wilsson E., Sundgren P.-E. The use of a behaviour test for the selection of dogs for service and breeding. I: Method of testing and evaluating test results in the adult dog, demands on different kinds of service dogs, sex and breed differences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1997, 53:279-295.
50. Wilsson E., Sundgren P.-E. Behaviour test for eight-week old puppies-heritabilities of tested behaviour traits and its correspondence to later behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 58:151-162.
51. Zwick W.R., Velicer W.F. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol. Bull. 1986, 99:432-442.