Assessing the quality of the peer review process: Author and editorial board member perspectives

American Journal of Infection Control

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 701-704

  Bunner, Christina ^a   Larson, Elaine L ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Journal metrics; Peer review; Quality improvement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION;

ATTITUDE; AUTHORSHIP; DATA COLLECTION; EDITORIAL POLICIES; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84867016393     PISSN: 01966553     EISSN: 15273296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. M. Shattell, P. Chinn, S.P. Thomas, and R.W. Cowling III Authors' and editors' perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals J Nurs Scholarsh 24 2010 58 65
2. E.J. Weber, P.P. Katz, J.F. Waeckerle, and M.L. Callaham Author perception of peer review: impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction JAMA 287 2002 2790 2793
3. N. Black, S. van Rooyen, F. Godlee, S. Evans, and R. Smith What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA 280 1998 231 233
4. S. Van Rooyen, N. Black, and F. Godlee Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts J Clin Epidemiol 52 1999 625 629