Author perception of peer review: Impact of review quality and acceptance on satisfaction

JAMA

Volumn 287, Issue 21, 2002, Pages 2790-2793

  Weber, Ellen J ^a   Katz, Patricia P ^a   Waeckerle, Joseph F ^b   Callaham, Michael L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PEER REVIEW; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SATISFACTION; WRITING;

EID: 0037024269     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2790     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Authors' criteria for selecting journals
2. Publication patterns and perceptions of the Australian podiatric medical faculty
3. Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance
4. Who reviews the reviewers? feasibility of using a fictitious manuscript to evaluate peer reviewer performance
5. Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts
6. Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts
7. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts
8. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review
9. The relationship between meeting patients' information needs and their satisfaction with hospital care and general health status outcomes
10. Physicianpatient communication: The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons