Whole Breast Lesion Detection Using Naive Bayes Classifier for Portable Ultrasound

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1870-1880

  Yang, Min Chun ^a   Huang, Chiun Sheng ^b   Chen, Jeon Hor ^c,d,e   Chang, Ruey Feng ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Lesion detection; Naive Bayes classifier; Portable ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BREAST LESION DETECTION; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; CONNECTED COMPONENT LABELING; DETECTION PERFORMANCE; DETECTION SCHEME; DUAL-CORE; FALSE POSITIVE; FRAMES PER SECONDS; INTEGRATED COMPUTER ENVIRONMENT; LESION DETECTION; NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIERS; NORMAL TISSUE; PC-BASED; PIXEL CLASSIFICATION; PORTABLE ULTRASOUND; SCREENING SYSTEM; SELECTION CRITERIA; ULTRASOUND IMAGING;

CLASSIFIERS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; PIXELS; TISSUE; ULTRASONICS;

ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST PAPILLOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLASSIFIER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLOID CARCINOMA; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPH; ECHOGRAPHY; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFILTRATING DUCTAL CARCINOMA; NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BAYES THEOREM; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MIDDLE AGED; MINIATURIZATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84867000020     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andre B., Vercauteren T., Buchner A.M., Shahid M.W., Wallace M.B., Ayache N. An image retrieval approach to setup difficulty levels in training systems for endomicroscopy diagnosis. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2010, 13:480-487.
2. Beigelman-Aubry C., Hill C., Guibal A., Savatovsky J., Grenier P.A. Multi-detector row CT and postprocessing techniques in the assessment of diffuse lung disease. Radiographics 2005, 25:1639-1652.
3. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., Mendelson E.B., Lehrer D., Bohm-Velez M., Pisano E.D., Jong R.A., Evans W.P., Morton M.J., Mahoney M.C., Larsen L.H., Barr R.G., Farria D.M., Marques H.S., Boparai K. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008, 299:2151-2163.
4. Bramer M. Pre-pruning classification trees to reduce overfitting in noisy domains Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning - IDEAL 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2002, 247-258. Springer, Berlin. H. Yin, N. Allinson, R. Freeman, J. Keane, S. Hubbard (Eds.).
5. Bribiesca E. An easy measure of compactness for 2D and 3D shapes. Pattern Recogn 2008, 41:543-554.
6. Buchberger W., Niehoff A., Obrist P., DeKoekkoek-Doll P., Dunser M. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: Detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2000, 21:325-336.
7. Cevenini G., Barbini E., Massai M.R., Barbini P. A naive Bayes classifier for planning transfusion requirements in heart surgery. J Eval Clin Pract 2011, [Epub ahead of print].
8. Chakraborty D.P. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data. Med Phys 1989, 16:561-568.
9. Chang J.M., Moon W.K., Cho N., Park J.S., Kim S.J. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). Eur J Radiol 2011, 78:99-103.
10. Chang R.F., Chang-Chien K.C., Takada E., Huang C.S., Chou Y.H., Kuo C.M., Chen J.H. Rapid image stitching and computer-aided detection for multipass automated breast ultrasound. Med Phys 2010, 37:2063-2073.
11. Cherri A.K., Karim M.A. Optical symbolic substitution: Edge detection using Prewitt, Sobel, and Roberts operators. Appl Opt 1989, 28:4644-4648.
12. Crystal P., Strano S.D., Shcharynski S., Koretz M.J. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003, 181:177-182.
13. Czerwinski R.N., Jones D.L., O'Brien W.D. Detection of lines and boundaries in speckle images-application to medical ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999, 18:126-136.
14. Domingos P., Pazzani M. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning 1997, 29:103-130.
15. Drukker K., Giger M.L., Horsch K., Kupinski M.A., Vyborny C.J., Mendelson E.B. Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. Med Phys 2002, 29:1438-1446.
16. Drukker K., Giger M.L., Mendelson E.B. Computerized analysis of shadowing on breast ultrasound for improved lesion detection. Med Phys 2003, 30:1833-1842.
17. Drukker K., Giger M.L., Metz C.E. Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology 2005, 237:834-840.
18. Dundar M., Fung G., Bogoni L., Macari M., Megibow A., Rao B. A methodology for training and validating a CAD system and potential pitfalls. Int Congress Series 2004, 1268:1010-1014.
19. Fournier D., Cremilleux B. A quality index for decision tree pruning. Knowledge Based Syst 2002, 15:37-43.
20. Giger M.L., Al-Hallaq H., Huo Z.M., Moran C., Wolverton D.E., Chan C.W., Zhong W.M. Computerized analysis of lesions in US images of the breast. Acad Radiol 1999, 6:665-674.
21. Gonzalez R.C., Woods R.E., Masters B.R. Digital image processing 2008, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
22. Gordon P.B., Goldenberg S.L. Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review. Cancer 1995, 76:626-630.
23. Haralick R.M. Digital step edges from zero crossing of 2nd directional-derivatives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1984, 6:58-68.
24. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., Venta L.A. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol 2004, 11:272-280.
25. Ikedo Y., Fukuoka D., Hara T., Fujita H., Takada E., Endo T., Morita T. Development of a fully automatic scheme for detection of masses in whole breast ultrasound images. Med Phys 2007, 34:4378-4388.
26. Kaplan S.S. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001, 221:641-649.
27. Keys R.G. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image-processing. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Proc 1981, 29:1153-1160.
28. Kim Y., Kim J.H., Basoglu C., Winter T.C. Programmable ultrasound imaging using multimedia technologies: A next-generation ultrasound machine. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 1997, 1:19-29.
29. Kolb T.M., Lichy J., Newhouse J.H. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: An analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002, 225:165-175.
30. Kotsianos-Hermle D., Hiltawsky K.M., Wirth S., Fischer T., Friese K., Reiser M. Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound. Eur J Radiol 2009, 71:109-115.
31. Lagerwaard F.J., Underberg R.W.M., Slotman B.J., Cuijpers J.P., Senan S. Use of maximum intensity projections (MIP) for target volume generation in 4DCT scans for lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005, 63:253-260.
32. Liberman L., Abramson A.F., Squires F.B., Glassman J.R., Morris E.A., Dershaw D.D. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Am J Roentgenol 1998, 171:35-40.
33. Mesev V. Morphological image analysis: Pinciples and applications. Environ Planning B-Planning Design 2001, 28:800-801.
34. Moon W.K., Shen Y.W., Huang C.S., Chiang L.R., Chang R.F. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37:539-548.
35. Morgan E.C., Lackner M., Vogel R.M., Baise L.G. Probability distributions for offshore wind speeds. Energy Conversion Manage 2011, 52:15-26.
36. Praagman J. Classification and regression trees - Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Eur J Operational Res 1985;19:144.
37. Quinlan J.R. Simplifying Decision Trees. Int J Man-Machine Studies 1987, 27:221-234.
38. Rakotomamonjy A., Deforge P., Marche P. Wavelet-based speckle noise reduction in ultrasound B-scan images. Ultrason Imaging 2000, 22:73-94.
39. Rosenfeld A., Pfaltz J.L. Sequential operations in digital picture processing. J ACM 1966, 13:471-494.
40. Sethian J.A. A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93:1591-1595.
41. Shipley J.A., Duck F.A., Goddard D.A., Hillman M.R., Halliwell M., Jones M.G., Thomas B.T. Automated quantitative volumetric breast ultrasound data-acquisition system. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005, 31:905-917.
42. Sijbers J., den Dekker A.J., Van Audekerke J., Verhoye M., Van Dyck D. Estimation of the noise in magnitude MR images. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 1998, 16:87-90.
43. Sijbers J., den Dekker A.J., Raman E., Van Dyck D. Parameter estimation from magnitude MR images. International Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology 1999, 10:109-114.
44. Theodoridis S., Koutroumbas K. Pattern Recognition 2009, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
45. Wagner R.F., Insana M.F., Smith S.W. Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 1988, 35:34-44.
46. Yu S., Guan L. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000, 19:115-126.