Long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multicentric comparative study of techniques and accesses

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 399-403

  Juliano, Roberto Vaz ^a   Mendonça, Rafaela R ^a   Meyer, Fernando ^b   Rubinstein, Maurício ^c   Lasmar, Marco Túlio Coelho ^a,d   Korkes, Fernando ^a   Tavares, Alessandro ^a   Pompeo, Antonio Carlos Lima ^a   Tobias Machado, Marcos ^a  

^a FACULDADE DE MEDICINA DO ABC   (Brazil)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^c Advanced Urologic Laparoscopy   (Brazil)

^d HOSPITAL FELÍCIO ROCHO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULP SCARDINO TECHNIQUE; DISMEMBERED TECHNIQUE; FEMALE; FENGER PLASTY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LATERO LATERAL ANASTOMOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROPERITONEUM APPROACH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSPERITONEUM APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79958237650     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2010.0281     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Nadler RB, Rao GS, Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Clayman RV. Acucise endopyelotomy: Assessment of long-term durability. J Urol 1996;156:1094-1097.
2. Tan BJ, Rastinehad AR, Marcovich R, Smith AD, Lee BR. Trends in ureteropelvic junction obstruction management among urologists in the United States. Urology 2005;65: 260-264. (Pubitemid 40248009)
3. Zhang X, Li HZ, Wang SG, Ma X, Zheng T, Fu B, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Experience with 50 cases. Urology 2005;66:514-517. (Pubitemid 41242314)
4. Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, Aigrain Y, El- Ghoneimi A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol 2005;173:1710-1713. (Pubitemid 40524811)
5. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM, Schuessler WW, Moore RG. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology 1995;46:791-795.
6. Bansal P, Gupta A, Mongha R, Narayan S, Kundu AK, Chakraborty SC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches-A single centre experience of three years.J Min Access Surg 2008;3:76-79.
7. Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Forster T, Eberli D, Zimmermann M, Mü ller A, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): Solving the technical difficulties. Eur Urol 2006;49:264-272. (Pubitemid 43197862)
8. Link RE, Bhayani SM, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 2006;243:486-491.
9. Shah KK, Louie M, Thaly RK, Patel VR. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A review of the current status. Int J Med Robot 2007;3:354-340.
10. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 1996;47:311-316. (Pubitemid 26089506)
11. Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard JJ, Mouly P, Manunta A, Antiphon P, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol 2001;166:48-50. (Pubitemid 32565339)
12. Turk IA, Davis JW, Winkelmann B, Deger S, Richter F, Fabrizio MD, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplastythe method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 2002;42:268-275. (Pubitemid 35024238)
13. Romero FR Wagner AA, Trapp C, Permpongkosol S, Muntener M, Link RE, et al. Transmesenteric laparoscopic pyeloplasty [voiding dysfunction]. J Urol 2006;176:2526-2529. (Pubitemid 44665955)
14. Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX Jr. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2005;48:973-977. (Pubitemid 41641648)
15. Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, Sugiono M, Schulze M, Teber D. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. J Urol 2007;177:1000-1005. (Pubitemid 46216356)
16. Tobias-Machado M, Lasmar MT, Wroclawski ER. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery with extracorporeal uretero-ureteral anastomosis for treating retrocaval ureter. Int Braz J Urol 2005;31:147-150. (Pubitemid 40778880)
17. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Frascher F. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2000;27:695-704.
18. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic Fenger plasty. J Endourol 2000;14:889-893. (Pubitemid 32101957)
19. Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: Update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2009;104:1722-1729.
20. Zhang X, Li HZ, Wang SG, Ma X, Zheng T, Fu B, Zhang J, Ye ZQ. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Experience with 50 cases. Urology 2005;66:514-517. (Pubitemid 41242314)
21. Nouralizadeh A, Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Soltani MH, Kilani HJ. Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction by division of the aberrant vein and cephalad relocation of the crossing artery: A long-term follow-up of 42 cases. J Endourol 2010;24:987-991.