Retention or deletion of personality disorder diagnoses for DSM-5: An expert consensus approach

Journal of Personality Disorders

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 689-703

  Mullins Sweatt, Stephanie N ^a   Bernstein, David P ^b   Widiger, Thomas A ^c  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSENSUS; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MANPOWER; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PSYCHIATRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSENSUS; DATA COLLECTION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHIATRY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 84866953457     PISSN: 0885579X     EISSN: 19432763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.689     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Psychiatric Association (2010). Classification issues under discussion. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from http://www.dsm5.org/Proposed Revisions/Pages/ClassificationIssues UnderDiscussion.aspx
2. Bernstein, D. B., Iscan, C., Maser, J., and the Boards of the Directors of the Association for Research in Personality Disorders and the International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders. (2007). Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 536-551.
3. Blashfield, R. K., & Intoccia, V. (2000). Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 472-47.
4. Bornstein, R. F. (2011). Reconceptualizing personality pathology in DSM-5: Limitations in evidence for eliminating dependent personality disorder and other DSM-IV syndromes. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 235-247.
5. Boschen, M. J., & Warner, J. C. (2009). Publication trends in individual DSM personality disorders: 1971-2015. Australian Psychologist, 44, 136-142.
6. Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 277-257.
7. Clarkin, J. F., & Huprich, S. K. (2011). Do DSM-5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? Journal of Personality Disorders, 25 192-205.
8. Cramer, V., Torgersen, S., & Kringlen, E. (2006). Personality disorders and quality of life: A population study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 47, 178-184.
9. Crawford, T. N., Cohen, P., Johnson, J. G., Kasen, S., First, M. B., Gordon, K., et al. (2005). Self-reported personality disorder in the children in the community sample: Convergent and prospective validity in late adolescence and adulthood. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 30-52.
10. First, M. B., Bell, C. B., Cuthbert, B., Krystal, J. H., Malison, R., Offord, D. R., et al. (2002). Personality disorders and relational disorders: A research agenda for addressing crucial gaps in DSM. In D. J. Kupfer, M. B. First, & D. A. Regier (Eds.), A research agenda for DSM-V (pp. 123-199) Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
11. Gunderson, J. G. (2010). Revising the borderline diagnosis for DSM-V: An alternative proposal. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 694-708.
12. Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 293-319.
13. Kendler, K. S., Kupfer, D., Narrow, W., Phillips, K., & Fawcett, J. (2009). Guidelines for making changes to DSM-V. Unpublished manuscript, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
14. Kraemer, H. C. (2008). DSM categories and dimensions in clinical and research contexts. In J. E. Helzer, H. C. Kraemer, R. F. Krueger, H. U. Wittchen, P. J. Sirovatka, & D. A. Regier (Eds.), Dimensional approaches to diagnostic classification. Refining the research agenda for DSM-V (pp. 5-17). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
15. Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Clark, L. A., Watson, D., Markon, K. E., Derringer, J., et al. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170-191.
16. Livesley, W. J. (2010). Confusion and incoherence in the classification of personality disorder: Commentary on the preliminary proposals for DSM-5. Psychological Injury and Law, 3, 304-313.
17. Miller, J. D., Widiger, T. A., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Narcissistic personality disorder and the DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119, 640-649.
18. Paris, J. (2011). Endophenotypes and the diagnosis of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorder, 25, 260-268.
19. Pilkonis, P., Hallquist, M. N., Morse, J. Q., & Stepp, S. D. (2011). Striking the (im) proper balance between scientific advances and clinical utility: Commentary on the DSM-5 proposal for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 68-82.
20. Pincus, A. L. (2011). Some comments on nomology, diagnostic process, and narcissistic personality disorder in the DSM-5 proposal for personality and personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 41-53.
21. Pincus, A. L. & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421-446.
22. Ronningstam, E. (2005). Narcissistic personality disorder. In M. Maj, J. E. Mezzich, H. S. Akiskal, & A. Okasha (Eds.), Personality disorders (pp. 277-327). New York: Wiley.
23. Ronningstam, E. (2011). Narcissistic personality disorder in DSM-V. In support of retaining a significant diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 248-259.
24. Shedler, J., Beck, A., Fonagy, P., Gabbard, G. O., Gunderson, J.G., Kernberg, O. D., et al. (2010). Personality disorders in DSM-5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 1027-1028.
25. Siever, L. (2011, May). DSM-V prototypes: issues and controversies. In J. Reich (Chair), Clinical Impressions of DSM-V Personality Disorders. Symposium conducted at the 164th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Honolulu, Hawaii.
26. Skodol, A. (2010, February 10). Rationale for proposing five specific personality types. Retrieved from http://www. dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/ RationaleforProposingFiveSpecificPer sonalityDisorderTypes.aspx
27. Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., et al. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 136-169.
28. Skodol, A., Bender, D. S., Oldham, J. M., Clark, L.A., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R. J., et al. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5. Part II: Clinical application. Personality disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 23-40.
29. Skodol, A., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Livesley, W. J., Morey, L. C., et al. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5. Part I: Description and rationale. Personality disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 4-22.
30. Skodol, A. E., Gunderson, J. G., Shea, M. T., McGlashan, T. H., Morey, L. C., Sanislow, C. A., et al. (2005). The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study (CLPS): Overview and implications. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 487-504.
31. Torgersen, S. (2009). Prevalence, sociodemographics, and functional impairment. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.). Essentials of Personality Disorders (pp. 83-102). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
32. Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355-380.
33. Ulrich, S., Farrington, D. P., & Coid, J. W. (2007). Dimensions of DSM-IV personality disorders and life success. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 657-663.
34. Widiger, T. A. (2011a). A shaky future for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 54-67.
35. Widiger, T. A. (2011b). The DSM-5 dimensional model of personality disorder: Rationale and empirical support. Journal of Personality Disorders, 222-234.
36. Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83.
37. Zimmerman, M. (2011). A critique of the proposed prototype rating system for personality disorders in DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 206-221.
38. Zimmerman, M. (in press). Is there adequate empirical justification for radically revising the personality disorders section for DSM-5? Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. doi: 10.1037/a0022108