A cooperative in-car game for heterogeneous players

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 167-174

  Broy, Nora ^a   Goebl, Sebastian ^a   Hauder, Matheus ^a   Kothmayr, Thomas ^a   Kugler, Michael ^b   Reinhart, Florian ^b   Salfer, Martin ^b   Schlieper, Kevin ^b   André, Elisabeth ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Collaborative games; Heterogeneous players; Multimodal user interfaces

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE GAMES; HETEROGENEOUS PLAYERS; MULTIMODAL USER INTERFACE; QUALITATIVE APPROACH; USER STUDY;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84866907769     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2381416.2381443     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. about.com. http://boardgames.about.com/od/cargames/a/geography.htm, 2011.
2. BMW AG. Setting new standards in rear seat entertainment. In The new BMW 7 Series., pages 187-188. BMW AG, https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/p/ pcgl/download.html?textId=14640&textAttachmentId=16473, September 2008.
3. L. Brunnberg and K. Hulterström. Designing for physical interaction and contingent encounters in a mobile gaming situation. In Workshop Paper at MobileHCI. Citeseer, 2003.
4. M. Esbjörnsson, O. Juhlin, and M. Östergren. Traffic encounters and hocman: Associating motorcycle ethnography with design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8:92-99, 2004. 10.1007/s00779-004-0260-4.
5. European Commission. Commission recommendation of 26 may 2008 on safe and efficient in-vehicle information and communication systems: update of the european statement of principles on human-machine interface (2008/653/ec). Official Journal of the European Union, 2008.
6. M. Hassenzahl. http://www.attrakdiff.de/en/AttrakDiff/What-is-AttrakDiff/ 2011.
7. M. Hassenzahl, S. Diefenbach, and A. Göritz. Needs, affect, and interactive products-facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22(5):353-362, 2010.
8. M. Hassenzahl, R. Kekez, and M. Burmester. The importance of a software's pragmatic quality depends on usage modes. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Work With Display Units (WWDU 2002), pages 275-276, 2002.
9. J. McDavid and L. Hawthorn. Program evaluation & performance measurement, chapter Applying qualitative evaluation methods. Sage Publications Inc., 2006.
10. M. Östergren and O. Juhlin. Car drivers using sound pryer - joint music listening in traffic encounters. In K. O'Hara and B. Brown, editors, Consuming Music Together, volume 35 of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 173-190. Springer Netherlands, 2006. 10.1007/1-4020-4097-0-9.
11. J. Schäuffele and T. Zurawka. Automotive Software Engineering: Principles, Processes, Methods, and Tools. SAE International, 2005.
12. K. Sheldon, A. Elliot, Y. Kim, and T. Kasser. What is satisfying about satisfying events? testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of personality and social psychology, 80(2):325, 2001.
13. J. Tester, B. Fogg, and M. Maile. Commuternews: a prototype of persuasive in-car entertainment. In CHI '00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, CHI EA '00, pages 24-25, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM.
14. Wikipedia. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/I-spy, 2011.
15. Wikipedia. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/20-questions/, 2011.