Entering the 'Darwinian Markets of Europe': Strategic Management of Space-Time in Two Regional Strategy Processes in Southern Finland, 1990-94

Space and Polity

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 153-174

  Ahlqvist, Toni ^a,b  

^a ACADEMY OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^b NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC HISTORY; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; MARKET SYSTEM; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

FINLAND;

EID: 84866863240     PISSN: 13562576     EISSN: 14701235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2012.721510     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Agnew, J. 2001. How many Europes? The European Union, eastward enlargement and uneven development. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1): 29-38.
2. Agnew, J. 2005. Hegemony: The New Shape of Global Power, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
3. Ahlqvist, T. 2008. Alueellisen muutoksen teknologiat: informaatiotalouden rakentuminen Varsinais-Suomessa 1985-2001 Annales Universitatis Turkuensis C 266, Painosalama, Turku
4. Anderson, B. 2010. Preemption, precaution, preparedness: anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6): 777-798.
5. Bakker, K. 2002. From state to market? Water mercantilización in Spain. Environment and Planning A, 34: 767-790.
6. Bakker, K. 2005. Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(3): 542-565.
7. Blatter, J. 2004. From 'spaces of places' to 'spaces of flows'? Territorial and functional governance in cross-border regions in Europe and North America. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3): 530-548.
8. Brenner, N. 1999. Globalization as reterritorialization: the rescaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36: 431-451.
9. Brenner, N. 2000. Building 'Euro-regions': locational politics and the political geography of neoliberalism in post-unification Germany. European Urban and Regional Studies, 7(4): 319-345.
10. Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Bristow, G. 2005. Everyone's a 'winner': problematising the discourse of regional competitiveness. Journal of Economic Geography, 5: 285-304.
12. Buch-Hansen, H. and Wigger, A. 2010. Revisiting 50 years of market-making: the neoliberal transformation of European competition policy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(1): 20-44.
13. Christopherson, S., Michie, J. and Tyler, P. 2010. Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1): 3-10.
14. Clark, J. and Jones, A. 2008. The spatialities of Europeanisation: territory, government and power in 'EUrope'. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS, 33: 300-318.
15. Clark, J. R. A. and Jones, A. R. (2009) Europeanisation and Its Discontents, Space and Polity, 13(3), pp. 193-212.
16. FDT (FinnCity Development Triangle) (1991) Asiantuntijaseminaari. Expert seminar, Forssa, Finland, May.
17. FDT. 1992. Suomen Kärkikolmio. Yhteistyön suuntaviivat, Turku: Koteva Oy.
18. Fukuyama, F. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press.
19. Gill, S. 1995. Globalisation, market civilisation, and disciplinary neoliberalism. Millennium, 24: 399-423.
20. Gualini, E. 2004. Regionalization as 'experimental regionalism': the rescaling of territorial policy-making in Germany. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2): 329-353.
21. Harvey, D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B, 71(1): 3-17.
22. Healey, P. 2004. The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1): 45-67.
23. Heidenrich, M. 2005. The renewal of regional capabilities: experimental regionalism in Germany. Research Policy, 34: 739-757.
24. Heiskala, R. 2000. Toiminta, tapa ja rakenne: kohti konstruktionistista synteesiä yhteiskuntateoriassa, Edited by: Heiskala, R. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
25. Henderson, D. 2000. EU regional innovation strategies: regional experimentalism in practice?. European Urban and Regional Studies, 7(4): 347-358.
26. Hermann, C. 2007. Neoliberalism in the European Union. Studies in Political Economy, 70: 61-89.
27. Hernesniemi, H., Lammi, M. and Ylä-Anttila, P. 1995. Kansallinen kilpailukyky ja teollinen tulevaisuus Discussion Paper No. 105, The Research Institute of Finnish Economy Series B, Helsinki
28. Hudson, R. 2010. Resilient regions in an uncertain world: wishful thinking or a practical reality?. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1): 11-25.
29. Jensen, O. B. and Richardson, T. 2001. Nested visions: new rationalities of space in European spatial planning. Regional Studies, 35(8): 703-717.
30. Jessop, B. 2008a. State Power: A Strategic-relational Approach, Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. Jessop, B. 2008b. "A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education". In Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe, Edited by: Jessop, B., Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. 13-39. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
32. Jessop, B. and Oosterlynck, S. 2008. Cultural political economy: on making the cultural turn without falling into soft economic sociology. Geoforum, 39: 1155-1169.
33. Johnson, C. 2008. Euro-politics of scale: competing visions of the region in eastern Germany. GeoJournal, 72: 75-89.
34. Jones, A. and Murphy, J. T. 2010. Theorizing practice in economic geography: foundations, challenges, and possibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 35(3): 366-392.
35. Kantola, A. and Seeck, H. 2011. Dissemination of management into politics: Michael Porter and the political uses of management consulting. Management Learning, 42(1): 25-47.
36. Koillinen, P. 1994. Varsinais-Suomen strategian sisältö: Lehdistöversio Strategy process of South-west Finland, Press version of the strategy outline published at the final meeting, March
37. Krugman, P. 1994. Competitiveness: a dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2): 28-44.
38. Lahti, P. and Koski, K. 1992. Avaintekijöistä yhdyskuntien ja yhdyskuntarakenteiden tulevassa kehityksessä, FinnCity Development Triangle Publication No. 5, Espoo
39. Lehvonen, P. Strategy process of South-west Finland, Paper presented at the final meeting March. Varsinais-Suomen strategiaprojektin kuvaus,
40. MacLeod, G. 1999. Place, politics and 'scale dependence': exploring the structuration of Euro-regionalism. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(3): 231-253.
41. Martin, R. and Sunley, P. 2003. Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?. Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 5-35.
42. Mitchell, K. 2006. Neoliberal governmentality in the European Union: education, training, and technologies of citizenship. Environment and Planning D, 24: 389-407.
43. Moisio, S. 1998. Finland, geopolitical image of threat and the post-cold war confusion. Geopolitics, 3(3): 104-124.
44. Moisio, S. 2002. EU eligibility, central Europe and the invention of applicant state narrative. Geopolitics, 7(3): 89-116.
45. Moisio, S. 2006. Competing geographies of sovereignty, regionality and globalisation: the politics of EU resistance in Finland 1991-1994. Geopolitics, 11(3): 439-464.
46. Moisio, S. 2011. "Beyond the domestic-international divide: state spatial transformation as neoliberal geopolitics". In International Studies: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Edited by: Aalto, P., Harle, V. and Moisio, S. 149-177. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Paasi, A. 1999. "The changing pedagogies of space: representation of the other in Finnish school geography textbooks". In Text and Image: Social Construction of Regional Knowledges, Edited by: Buttimer, A., Brunn, S. and Wardenga, U. 226-237. Leipzig: InstitutfürLänderkunde.
48. Paasi, A. 2001. Europe as a social process and discourse: considerations of place, boundaries and identity. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(1): 7-28.
49. Paasi, A. 2002. Regional transformation in the European context: notes on regions, boundaries and identity. Space & Polity, 6(2): 197-120.
50. Paasio, A. Strategy process of South-west Finland, Appendix 6. meeting September 10. Strategiatyöskentelyn perusteita,
51. Paasio, A. Strategy process of South-west Finland, Paper presented at the final meeting. March. Nelikenttäanalyysi, tulokset ja johtopäätökset,
52. Peck, J. 2001. Neoliberalizing states: thin policies/hard outcomes. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3): 445-455.
53. Peck, J. 2005. Economic sociologies in space. Economic Geography, 81(2): 129-175.
54. Pike, A., Dawley, S. and Tomaney, J. 2010. Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3(1): 59-70.
55. Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: Free Press.
56. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
57. Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.
58. Porter, M. E. 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 95-117.
59. Rivolin, U. J. and Faludi, A. 2005. The hidden face of European spatial planning: innovations in governance. European Planning Studies, 13(2): 195-215.
60. Schienstock, G. 2007. From path dependency to path creation: Finland on its way to the knowledge-based economy. Current Sociology, 55(1): 92-109.
61. Scott, J. W. 2002. A networked space of meaning? Spatial politics as geostrategies of European integration. Space & Polity, 6(2): 147-167.
62. Seppälä, Y. 1991. Veljellisen kilvoittelun Kärkikolmio FinnCity Development Triangle Publication No. 2, Helsinki
63. Sheppard, E. 2002. The spaces and times of globalization: place, scale, networks, and positionality. Economic Geography, 78(3): 307-330.
64. Sölvell, Ö., Zander, I. and Porter, M. E. 1991. Advantage Sweden, Stockholm: Norstedts.