Shear strength behavior of human trabecular bone

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 45, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 2513-2519

  Sanyal, Arnav ^a   Gupta, Atul ^a   Bayraktar, Harun H ^a   Kwon, Ronald Y ^a   Keaveny, Tony M ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California at Berkeley   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite element; Microarchitecture; Shear; Trabeculae; Yield

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT; MICRO ARCHITECTURES; SHEAR; TRABECULAE; YIELD;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; TISSUE; VOLUME FRACTION;

BONE;

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BONE LEVEL; BONE MASS; BONE STRENGTH; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINEMATICS; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; TRABECULAR BONE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE AND BONES; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 84866756668     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.07.023     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams, M.F., Bayraktar, H.H., Keaveny, T.M., Papadopoulos, P., 2004. Ultrascalable implicit finite element analyses in solid mechanics with over a half a billion degrees of freedom. ACM/IEEE Proceedings of SC2004: High Performance Networking and Computing.
2. Arlot M.E., Burt-Pichat B., Roux J.P., Vashishth D., Bouxsein M.L., Delmas P.D. Microarchitecture influences microdamage accumulation in human vertebral trabecular bone. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2008, 23(10):1613-1618.
3. Beck J.D., Canfield B.L., Haddock S.M., Chen T.J., Kothari M., Keaveny T.M. Three-dimensional imaging of trabecular bone using the computer numerically controlled milling technique. Bone 1997, 21(3):281-287.
4. Bevill G., Eswaran S.K., Farahmand F., Keaveny T.M. The influence of boundary conditions and loading mode on high-resolution finite element-computed trabecular tissue properties. Bone 2009, 44(4):573-578.
5. Bevill G., Eswaran S.K., Gupta A., Papadopoulos P., Keaveny T.M. Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone. Bone 2006, 39(6):1218-1225.
6. Bevill G., Farhamand F., Keaveny T.M. Heterogeneity of yield strain in low-density versus high-density human trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 2009, 42(13):2165-2170.
7. Bourne B.C., van der Meulen M.C. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation. Journal of Biomechanics 2004, 37(5):613-621.
8. Carnelli D., Gastaldi D., Sassi V., Contro R., Ortiz C., Vena P. A finite element model for direction-dependent mechanical response to nanoindentation of cortical bone allowing for anisotropic post-yield behavior of the tissue. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2010, 132(8):081008.
9. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate. Science 1976, 194(4270):1174-1176.
10. Cheal E.J., Spector M., Hayes W.C. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1992, 10(3):405-422.
11. Ciarelli M.J., Goldstein S.A., Kuhn J.L., Cody D.D., Brown M.B. Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1991, 9(5):674-682.
12. Ciarelli T.E., Fyhrie D.P., Schaffler M.B., Goldstein S.A. Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2000, 15(1):32-40.
13. Fenech C.M., Keaveny T.M. A cellular solid criterion for predicting the axial-shear failure properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1999, 121(4):414-422.
14. Ford C.M., Keaveny T.M. The dependence of shear failure properties of bovine tibial trabecular bone on apparent density and trabecular orientation. Journal of Biomechanics 1996, 29(10):1309-1317.
15. Fyhrie D.P., Schaffler M.B. Failure mechanisms in human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 1994, 15(1):105-109.
16. Garnier K.B., Dumas R., Rumelhart C., Arlot M.E. Mechanical characterization in shear of human femoral cancellous bone: torsion and shear tests. Medical Engineering & Physics 1999, 21(9):641-649.
17. Garrison J.G., Gargac J.A., Niebur G.L. Shear strength and toughness of trabecular bone are more sensitive to density than damage. Journal of Biomechanics 2011, 44(16):2747-2754.
18. Goldstein S.A. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. Journal of Biomechanics 1987, 20(11/12):1055-1061.
19. Goulet R.W., Goldstein S.A., Ciarelli M.J., Kuhn J.L., Brown M.B., Feldkamp L.A. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 1994, 27(4):375-389.
20. Gross T., Pahr D.H., Peyrin F., Zysset P.K. Mineral heterogeneity has a minor influence on the apparent elastic properties of human cancellous bone: a SRμCT-based finite element study. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2012.
21. Guldberg R.E., Hollister S.J., Charras G.T. The accuracy of digital image-based finite element models. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1998, 120(4):289-295.
22. Halawa M., Lee A.J., Ling R.S., Vangala S.S. The shear strength of trabecular bone from the femur, and some factors affecting the shear strength of the cement-bone interface. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 1978, 92(1):19-30.
23. Hildebrand T., Laib A., Müller R., Dequeker J., Rüegsegger P. Direct three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cancellous bone: microstructural data from spine, femur, iliac crest, and calcaneus. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1999, 14(7):1167-1174.
24. Homminga J., Van-Rietbergen B., Lochmuller E.M., Weinans H., Eckstein F., Huiskes R. The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads. Bone 2004, 34(3):510-516.
25. Jaasma M.J., Bayraktar H.H., Niebur G.L., Keaveny T.M. Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in tissue modulus for trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 2002, 35(2):237-246.
26. Karim L., Vashishth D. Role of trabecular microarchitecture in the formation, accumulation, and morphology of microdamage in human cancellous bone. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2011, 29(11):1739-1744.
27. Kasra M., Grynpas M.D. On shear properties of trabecular bone under torsional loading: effects of bone marrow and strain rate. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40(13):2898-2903.
28. Keller T.S. Predicting the compressive mechanical-behavior of bone. Journal of Biomechanics 1994, 27(9):1159-1168.
29. Keyak J.H. Relationships between femoral fracture loads for two load configurations. Journal of Biomechanics 2000, 33(4):499-502.
30. Kopperdahl D.L., Keaveny T.M. Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 1998, 31(7):601-608.
31. Laib A., Kumer J.L., Majumdar S., Lane N.E. The temporal changes of trabecular architecture in ovariectomized rats assessed by MicroCT. Osteoporosis International 2001, 12(11):936-941.
32. Lotz J.C., Cheal E.J., Hayes W.C. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I-Linear analysis. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1991, 113(4):353-360.
33. Mitton D., Rumelhart C., Hans D., Meunier P.J. The effects of density and test conditions on measured compression and shear strength of cancellous bone from the lumbar vertebrae of ewes. Medical Engineering & Physics 1997, 19(5):464-474.
34. Morgan E.F., Keaveny T.M. Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34(5):569-577.
35. Nádai A. Theory of Flow and Fracture of Solids 1950, McGraw-Hill, New York, 347-352.
36. Nagaraja S., Couse T.L., Guldberg R.E. Trabecular bone microdamage and microstructural stresses under uniaxial compression. Journal of Biomechanics 2005, 38(4):707-716.
37. Neibur G.L., Yuen J.C., Hsia A.C., Keaveny T.M. Convergence behavior of high resolution finite element models of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1999, 121:629-635.
38. Pahr D.H., Zysset P.K. Influence of boundary conditions on computed apparent elastic properties of cancellous bone. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2008, 7(6):463-476.
39. Papadopoulos P., Lu J. On the formulation and numerical solution of problems in anisotropic finite plasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001, 190(37-38):4889-4910.
40. Rice J.C., Cowin S.C., Bowman J.A. On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. Journal of Biomechanics 1988, 21(2):155-168.
41. Rincón-Kohli L., Zysset P.K. Multi-axial mechanical properties of human trabecular bone. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2009, 8(3):195-208.
42. Saha S., Gorman P.H. Strength of human cancellous bone in shear and its relationship to bone mineral content. Transactions of Orthopaedic Research Society 1981, 217.
43. Schwiedrzik J.J., Zysset P.K. An anisotropic elastic-viscoplastic damage model for bone tissue. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 2012.
44. Shi X., Liu X.S., Wang X., Guo X.E., Niebur G.L. Effects of trabecular type and orientation on microdamage susceptibility in trabecular bone. Bone 2010, 46(5):1260-1266.
45. Stolken J.S., Kinney J.H. On the importance of geometric nonlinearity in finite-element simulations of trabecular bone failure. Bone 2003, 33(4):494-504.
46. Stone J.L., Beaupre G.S., Hayes W.C. Multiaxial strength characteristics of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics 1983, 16(9):743-752.
47. van der Linden J.C., Birkenhager-Frenkel D.H., Verhaar J.A., Weinans H. Trabecular bone's mechanical properties are affected by its non-uniform mineral distribution. Journal of Biomechanics 2001, 34(12):1573-1580.
48. van Rietbergen B., Odgaard A., Kabel J., Huiskes R. Direct mechanics assessment of elastic symmetries and properties of trabecular bone architecture. Journal of Biomechanics 1996, 29(12):1653-1657.
49. Verhulp E., van Rietbergen B., Muller R., Huiskes R. Indirect determination of trabecular bone effective tissue failure properties using micro-finite element simulations. Journal of Biomechanics 2008, 41(7):1479-1485.
50. Wegrzyn J., Roux J.P., Arlot M.E., Boutroy S., Vilayphiou N., Guyen O., Delmas P.D., Chapurlat R., Bouxsein M.L. Role of trabecular microarchitecture and its heterogeneity parameters in the mechanical behavior of ex vivo human L3 vertebrae. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2010, 25(11):2324-2331.
51. Yeh O.C., Keaveny T.M. Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in trabecular architecture: a three-dimensional finite element study. Bone 1999, 25(2):223-228.
52. Yeni Y.N., Zinno M.J., Yerramshetty J.S., Zauel R., Fyhrie D.P. Variability of trabecular microstructure is age-, gender-, race- and anatomic site-dependent and affects stiffness and stress distribution properties of human vertebral cancellous bone. Bone 2011, 49(4):886-894.