Self-triggered observer based control of linear plants

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 44, Issue 1 PART 1, 2011, Pages 10074-10079

  Almeida, João ^a   Silvestre, Carlos ^a   Pascoal, António ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Dynamic output feedback; Linear systems; Sampled data control; Sampling actions; State observers

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP SYSTEMS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; LINEAR SYSTEMS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; STATE FEEDBACK;

CONTROL STRATEGIES; DYNAMIC OUTPUT FEEDBACK; INPUT TO STATE STABLE; LINEAR TIME INVARIANT PLANT; OBSERVER BASED CONTROL; SAMPLED-DATA CONTROL; SCHEDULING METHODS; STATE OBSERVER;

SAMPLED DATA CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 84866751835     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.02235     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Almeida, J., Silvestre, C., and Pascoal, A.M. (2011). Selftriggered output feedback control of linear plants. In Proc. of the 2011 American Control Conf. San Francisco, CA, USA. (To appear).
2. Anta, A. and Tabuada, P. (2010). To sample or not to sample: Self-triggered control for nonlinear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(9), 2030-2042.
3. Åström, K.J. (2008). Event based control. In A. Astolfi and L. Marconi (eds.), Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems, 127-147. Springer.
4. ∞-gain and improved event-triggering. In Proc. of the 49th Conf. on Decision and Control, 3246-3251. Atlanta, GA, USA.
5. Khalil, H.K. (2002). Nonlinear Systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 3rd edition.
6. Li, L. and Lemmon, M. (2010). Event-triggered output feedback control of finite horizon discrete-time multidimensional linear processes. In Proc. of the 49th Conf. on Decision and Control, 3221-3226. Atlanta, GA, USA.
7. Lunze, J. and Lehmann, D. (2010). A state-feedback approach to event-based control. Automatica, 46(1), 211-215.
8. Mazo Jr., M., Anta, A., and Tabuada, P. (2010). An ISS self-triggered implementation of linear controllers. Automatica, 46(8), 1310-1314.
9. Mazo Jr., M. and Tabuada, P. (2008). On event-triggered and self-triggered control over sensor/actuator networks. In Proc. of the 47th Conf. on Decision and Control, 435-440. Cancun, Mexico.
10. Molin, A. and Hirche, S. (2010). Structural characterization of optimal event-based controllers for linear stochastic systems. In Proc. of the 49th Conf. on Decision and Control, 3227-3233. Atlanta, GA, USA.
11. Sontag, E.D. and Wang, Y. (1995). On characterizations of the input-to-state stability property. System and Control Letters, 24(5), 351-359.
12. Tabuada, P. (2007). Event-triggered real-time scheduling of stabilizing control tasks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52(9), 1680-1685.
13. Van Loan, C. (1977). The sensitivity of the matrix exponential. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 14(6), 971-981.
14. Velasco, M., Martí, P., and Fuertes, J.M. (2003). The self triggered task model for real-time control systems. In Work in Progress Proc. of the 24th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symp., 67-70. Cancun, Mexico.
15. Walsh, C.G. and Ye, H. (2001). Scheduling of networked control systems. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(1), 57-65.
16. Wang, X. and Lemmon, M.D. (2008). Event-triggered broadcasting across distributed networked control systems. In Proc. of the 2008 American Control Conf., 3139-3144. Seattle, Washington, USA.
17. Wang, X. and Lemmon, M.D. (2010). Self-triggering under state-independent disturbances. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55(6), 1494-1500.
18. Yook, K.J., Tilbury, D.M., and Soparkar, N.R. (2002). Trading computation for bandwidth: Reducing communication in distributed control systems using state estimators. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 10(4), 503-518.