Obtaining consensus about patient-centred professionalism in community nursing: Nominal group work activity with professionals and the public

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 68, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 2429-2442

  Hutchings, Hayley ^a   Rapport, Frances ^a   Wright, Sarah ^a   Doel, Marcus ^a   Jones, Aled ^b  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Community nursing; Consensus methods; Consultation workshops; Nominal group work; Patient centred professionalism

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; CONSENSUS; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; PHARMACY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING; COMMUNITY PHARMACY SERVICES; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; CONSENSUS; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; WALES;

EID: 84866748561     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05938.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Askham J. & Chisholm A. (2006) Patient-centred medical professionalism: towards an agenda for research and action. Retrieved from http://www.pickereurope.org/Filestore/PIE_reports/PCP/pcpconcepts-report-PDF.pdf, Picker Institute on 30 December 2011.
2. Bloor M., Frankland J., Thomas M. & Robson K. (2001) Focus Groups in Social Research. Sage Publications Ltd, London.
3. Carney O., McIntosh J. & Worth A. (1996) The use of the Nominal Group Technique in research with community nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23(5), 1024-1029.
4. Chapple M. & Murphy R. (1996) The nominal group technique: extending the evaluation of students' teaching and learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21(2), 147-160.
5. Delbecq A.L. & van de Ven A.H. (1971) A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Applied Behavioural Science 7, 466-491.
6. Delbecq A.L., Van de Ven A.H. & Gustafson D.H. (1975) Group Techniques for Program Planning, A Guide to Nominal and Delphi Processes. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL.
7. Fink A., Kosecoff J., Chassin M. & Brook R.H. (1984) Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health 74(9), 979-983.
8. General Medical Council (1995) Good Medical Practice. GMC, London.
9. Hutchings H.A., Rapport F.L., Wright S., Doel M.A. & Wainwright P. (2010) Obtaining consensus regarding patient-centred professionalism in community pharmacy: nominal group work activity with professionals, stakeholders and members of the public. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 18(3), 149-158.
10. International Council of Nurses (2006) The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses. Retrieved from http://www.icn.ch/images/stories/documents/about/icncode_english.pdf on 30 December 2011.
11. Irvine D.H. (2004) Time for hard decisions on patient-centred professionalism. Medical Journal of Australia 181, 271-274.
12. Irvine D. (2005) Patients, professionalism, and revalidation. BMJ 330(7502), 1265-1268.
13. Jones J. & Hunter D. (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311(7001), 376-380.
14. Larsson L.S. & Butterfield P. (2002) Mapping the future of environmental health and nursing: strategies for integrating national competencies into nursing practice. Public Health Nursing 19(4), 301-308.
15. Mays N. & Pope C. (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 320(7226), 50-52.
16. Nolan M.R., Davies S., Brown J., Keady J. & Nolan J. (2004) Beyond person-centred care: a new vision for gerontological nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13(3a), 45-53.
17. Pelzang R. (2010a) Time to learn: understanding patient-centred care. British Journal of Nursing 19(14), 912-917.
18. Pelzang R., Wood B. & Black S. (2010b) Nurses' understanding of patient-centred care in Bhutan. British Journal of Nursing 19(3), 186-193.
19. Perry J. & Linsley S. (2006) The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluative tool in the teaching and summative assessment of the inter-personal skills of student mental health nurses. Nurse Education Today 26, 346-353.
20. Pope C., Ziebland S. & Mays N. (2000) Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 320(7227), 114-116.
21. Rapport F., Doel M.A., Greaves D. & Elwyn G. (2006) From manila to monitor: biographies of general practitioner workspaces. Health (London) 10(2), 233-251.
22. Rapport F., Doel M.A. & Elwyn G. (2007) Snapshots and snippets: general practitioners' reflections on professional space. Health Place 13(2), 532-544.
23. Rapport F., Doel M.A. & Jerzembek G.S. (2009a) "Convenient space" or "a tight squeeze": insider views on the community pharmacy. Health Place 15(1), 315-322.
24. Rapport F., Doel M.A. & Jerzembek G.S. (2009b) Challenges to UK community pharmacy: a bio-photographic study of workspace in relation to professional pharmacy practice. Medical Humanities 35(2), 110-117.
25. Rapport F., Doel M.A., Hutchings H.A., John D.N., Wainwright P., Jerzembek G.S., Dobbs C., Newbury S. & Trower C.S. (2010a) Through the looking glass: public and professional perspectives on patient-centred professionalism in modern-day pharmacy. Forum:Qualitative Social Research 11(1), Article 7. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1301/2892 on 30 December 2011.
26. Rapport F., Doel M.A., Hutchings H.A., Wright S., Wainwright P., John D.N. & Jerzembek G.S. (2010b) Eleven themes of patient-centred professionalism in community pharmacy: innovative approaches to consulting. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice 18(5), 260-268.
27. Royal College of Nursing (2003) Defining Nursing. Retrieved from http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/78564/001983.pdf on 30 December 2011.
28. Seale C. & Silverman D. (1997) Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. European Journal of Public Health 7, 379-384.
29. Silverman D. (1997) Validity and credibility in qualitative research. In Context and Method in Qualitative Research, The Alternative Paradigm (Miller G. & Dingwall R., eds), Sage, London, pp. 12-25.