Obtaining consensus regarding patient-centred professionalism in community pharmacy: Nominal group work activity with professionals, stakeholders and members of the public

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 149-158

  Hutchings, Hayley A ^a   Rapport, Frances L ^a   Wright, Sarah ^a   Doel, Marcus A ^b   Wainwright, Paul ^c  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consensus methods; Nominal Group Work technique; Patient centred professionalism; Professionals; Public; UK community pharmacy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT SAFETY; PHARMACIST; PHARMACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONALISM; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; WORKSHOP;

CONSENSUS; DRUG INDUSTRY; EDUCATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PATIENTS; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES; PHARMACIES; PHARMACISTS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;

EID: 77952476984     PISSN: 09617671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1211/ijpp.18.03.0004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Williams KF. Re-examining 'professionalism' in pharmacy: a South African perspective. Soc Sci Med 2007 64 : 1285 1296. (Pubitemid 46281403)
2. Droege M. The role of reflective practice in pharmacy. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2003 16 : 68 74. (Pubitemid 36442773)
3. Boyle CJ et al. Professionalism: a determining factor in experiential learning. Am J Pharm Educ 2007 71 : 31.
4. Hammer DP et al. Student professionalism. Am J Pharm Educ 2003 67 : 1 29.
5. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Code of Ethics for Pharmacists and Pharmacy Technicians. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2007
6. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Code of Ethics. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain www.rpsgb.org/protectingthepublic/ ethics/(accessed 13 August 2009).
7. Askham J, Chisholm A. Patient-Centred Medical Professionalism: Towards an Agenda for Research and Action. Oxford: Picker Institute, 2006. www.pickereurope.org/Filestore/PIE-reports/PCP/pcpconcepts-report-PDF.pdf (accessed 3 March 2010).
8. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995 311 : 376 380.
9. Fink A et al. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984 74 : 979 983. (Pubitemid 14059576)
10. Delbecq AL, van de Ven AH. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Appl Behav Sci 1971 7 : 466 491.
11. Delbecq AL et al. Group Techniques for Program Planning. A Guide to Nominal and Delphi Processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1975.
12. Chapple M, Murphy R. The nominal group technique: extending the evaluation of students' teaching and learning. Assess Eval Higher Educ 1996 21 : 147 160. (Pubitemid 126068733)
13. Cantrill JA et al. Indicators of the appropriateness of long-term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdom: consensus development, face and content validity, feasibility, and reliability. Qual Health Care 1998 7 : 130 135. (Pubitemid 28442669)
14. MacKinnon NJ et al. Addressing the hospital pharmacy management crisis: development of strategies and solutions. Can Pharm J/Rev Pharm Can 2006 139 : 43.
15. Bissell P et al. Appropriateness measurement: application to advice-giving in community pharmacies. Soc Sci Med 2000 51 : 343 359. (Pubitemid 30236195)
16. Edmunds J, Calnan MW. The reprofessionalisation of community pharmacy? An exploration of attitudes to extended roles for community pharmacists amongst pharmacists and General Practioners in the United Kingdom. Soc Sci Med 2001 53 : 943 955. (Pubitemid 32727829)
17. Rapport F et al. Through the looking glass: public and professional perspectives on patient-centred professionalism in modern-day pharmacy. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2010 11 article 7.
18. Bloor M et al. Focus Groups in Social Research Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1975.
19. Silverman D. Validity and credibility in qualitative research. In : Miller G, Dingwall R, editors. Context and Method in Qualitative Research. The Alternative Paradigm. London: Sage Publications, 1997: 1225.
20. Pope C et al. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000 320 : 114 116. (Pubitemid 30173021)
21. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ 2000 320 : 50 52. (Pubitemid 30173021)
22. Seale C, Silverman D. Ensuring rigour in qualitative research. Eur J Public Health 1997 7 : 379 384. (Pubitemid 28016392)
23. Sleath B, Campbell W. American pharmacy: a profession in the final stage of dividing?. J Pharm Marketing Manag 2001 14 : 1 25. (Pubitemid 33368998)
24. Hibbert D et al. Consumerism and professional work in the community pharmacy. Sociol Health Illness 2002 24 : 46 65.
25. Chaar B et al. Professional ethics in pharmacy: the Australian experience. Int J Pharm Pract 2005 13 : 195 205. (Pubitemid 41376660)