Seeing double without confusion: Structure-from-motion in highly ambiguous scenes

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1458-1465

  Jiang, Nianjuan ^a   Tan, Ping ^a   Cheong, Loong Fah ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3D RECONSTRUCTION; CORRECT SOLUTION; EPIPOLAR GEOMETRY; FEATURE CORRESPONDENCE; GLOBAL MINIMA; IMAGE PAIRS; LOCAL MINIMUMS; OPTIMIZATION CRITERIA; OPTIMIZATION OBJECTIVE FUNCTION; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION;

ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84866712343     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247834     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. C. Bibby and I. Reid. Simultaneous localisation and mapping in dynamic environments (SLAMIDE) with reversible data association. In Proc. of Robotics Sci. and Syst., 2007. 2
2. D. Crandall, A. Owens, N. Snavely, and D. Huttenlocher. Discrete-continuous optimization for large-scale structure from motion. In Proc. CVPR, 2011. 2
3. O. Enqvist, F. Kahl, and C. Olsson. Non-sequential structure from motion. In Proc. ICCV Workshops, pages 264-271, 2011. 1
4. Y. Furukawa and J. Ponce. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 32:1362-1376, 2010. 2, 3
5. A. Gil, O. Reinoso, O. Mozos, C. Stachnissi, and W. Burgard. Improving data association in vision-based slam. In Proc. IROS, pages 2076-2081, 2006. 2
6. V. Govindu. Robustness in motion averaging. In Proc. ACCV, pages 457-466, 2006. 2
7. M. Havlena, A. Torii, J. Knopp, and T. Pajdla. Randomized structure from motion based on atomic 3d models from camera triplets. In Proc. CVPR, pages 2874-2881, 2009. 1, 2
8. M. Klopschitz, A. Irschara, G. Reitmayr, and D. Schmalstieg. Robust incremental structure from motion. In Proc. 3DPVT, 2010. 2
9. X. Li, C. Wu, C. Zach, S. Lazebnik, and J.-M. Frahm. Modeling and recognition of landmark image collections using iconic scene graphs. In Proc. ECCV, 2008. 2
10. D. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 60:91-110, 2004. 2
11. D.Martinec and T. Pajdla. Robust rotation and translation estimation in multiview reconstruction. In Proc. CVPR, 2007. 1, 2, 4
12. D. Nistér. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 26:756-777, 2004. 1
13. A. Ranganathan, E. Menegatti, and F. Dellaert. Bayesian inference in the space of topological maps. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 22:92-107, 2006. 2
14. R. Roberts, S. Sinha, R. Szeliski, and D. Steedly. Structure from motion for scenes with large duplicate structures. In Proc. CVPR, 2011. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6
15. F. Schaffalitzky and A. Zisserman. Multi-view matching for unordered image sets, or "how do i organize my holiday snaps?". In Proc. ECCV, pages 414-431, 2002. 2
16. S. Sinha, D. Steedly, and R. Szeliski. A multi-staged linear approach to structure from motion. In In RMLE-ECCV workshop, 2010. 2
17. N. Snavely, S. Seitz, and R. Szeliski. Modeling the world from internet photo collections. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 80:189-210, 2008. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7
18. C. Zach, A. Irschara, and H. Bischof. What can missing correspondences tell us about 3d structure and motion? In Proc. CVPR, 2008. 2, 3
19. C. Zach, M. Klopschitz, and M. Pollefeys. Disambiguating visual relations using loop constraints. In Proc. CVPR, pages 1426-1433, 2010. 1, 2, 4, 6, 7