Inverse workflows for supporting agile business process management

Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI)

Volumn P-182, Issue , 2011, Pages 194-203

  Sauer, Thomas ^a   Minor, Mirjam ^b   Bergmann, Ralph ^b  

^a rjm Business Solutions GmbH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

AGILE PROCESS; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; OVERALL PROCESS; QUALITY REQUIREMENTS; STAKEHOLDER DEMANDS; WORK-FLOWS;

MANAGEMENT SCIENCE;

EID: 84866699430     PISSN: 16175468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ian Alexander. Misuse Cases: Use Cases with Hostile Intent. IEEE Software, 20(1):58-66, 2003.
2. Ralph Bergmann, Klaus-Dieter Althoff, Mirjam Minor, Meike Reichle, and Kerstin Bach. Case-Based Reasoning: Introduction and Recent Developments. Künstliche Intelligenz, 23(1):5-11, 2009.
3. George Cybenko and Vincent H. Berk. Process Query Systems. Computer, 40(1):62-70, 2007.
4. Alexander Förster, Gregor Engels, and Tim Schattkowsky. Activity Diagram Patterns forModeling Quality Constraints in Business Processes. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS 2005), volume 3713 of LNCS, pages 2-16. Springer, 2005.
5. Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite and Jorge Horacio Doorn. Perspectives on Software Requirements, volume 753 of International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Springer, 2003.
6. MirjamMinor, Alexander Tartakovski, Daniel Schmalen, and Ralph Bergmann. Agile Workflow Technology and Case-Based Change Reuse for Long-Term Processes. International Journal on Intelligent Information Technologies, 4(1):80-98, 2008.
7. Jörg Rech, Raimund L. Feldmann, and Eric Ras. Knowledge Patterns. In M. E. Jennex, editor, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management (2nd Edition). IGI Global, 2009.
8. Anne Rozinat and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Information Systems, 33(1):64-95, 2008.
9. Nick Russell,Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, and Petia Wohed. On the suitability of UML 2.0 activity diagrams for business process modelling. In Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2005), volume 53 of CRPIT, pages 95-104. Australian Computer Society, 2006.
10. Thomas Sauer. Automated Enactment Tracking for Dynamic Workflows. PhD thesis, University of Trier, 2010.
11. Carlo Simon and Jan Mendling. Verification of Forbidden Behavior in EPCs. In Proceedings of the GI Conference Modellierung (MOD2006), volume 82 of LNI, pages 233-242. GI, 2006.
12. Thomas Sauer, Kerstin Maximini, Rainer Maximini, and Ralph Bergmann. Supporting Collaborative Business through Integration of Knowledge Distribution and Agile Process Management. In Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2006 (MKWI 2006), pages 349-361, 2006.
13. Thomas Sauer, Mirjam Minor, and Sascha Werno. An Agent-oriented System for Workflow Enactment Tracking. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE'08), pages 235-240, 2008.
14. Nikola Trcka, Natalia Sidorova, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. Data-Flow Anti- Patterns: Discovering Dataflow Errors in Workflows. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Systems (CAiSE'09), volume 5565 of LNCS, pages 425-439. Springer, 2009.
15. Jeffrey Voas and Phil Laplante. Effectively Defining Shall Not Requirements. IEEE IT Professional, 12(3):46-53, 2010.
16. Gerhard Weiss. Multiagent Systems - A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. MIT press, 2000.