On the suitability of UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams for business process modelling

Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series

Volumn 53, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Russell, Nick ^a   Van Der Aalst, Wil M P ^a,b   Ter Hofstede, Arthur H M ^a   Wohed, Petia ^c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY DIAGRAM; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING; COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION; CONTROL-FLOW; DESIGN ACTIVITY; EVALUATION FRAMEWORK; PROCESS-AWARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESOURCE CAPABILITIES; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; STATIC AND DYNAMIC; SWISS ARMY; SYSTEMS MODELLING; UML 2.0; WORKFLOW PATTERNS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 77954088369     PISSN: 14451336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bubenko, J., Persson, A. & Stirna, J. (2001), EKD user guide, Technical report, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
2. Curtis, B., Kellner, M. & Over, J. (1992), 'Process modelling', Communications of the ACM 35(9), 75-90. (Pubitemid 23584400)
3. Dumas, M. & ter Hofstede, A. (2001), UML activity diagrams as a workflow specification language, in M. Gogolla & C. Kobryn, eds, 'Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML 2001)', LNCS 2185, Springer, Toronto, Canada, pp. 76-90. (Pubitemid 33351886)
4. Eriksson, H. & Penker, M. (2000), Business Modeling with UML, OMG Press, New York.
5. Humphrey, W. & Feiler, P. H. (1992), Software process development and enactment : Concepts and definitions, Technical Report SEI-92-TR-4, SEI Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
6. Jablonski, S. & Bussler, C. (1996), Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation, Thomson Computer Press, London, UK.
7. Kueng, P., Kawalek, P. & Bichler, P. (1996), How to compose an object-oriented business process model?, in S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen & R. Welke, eds, 'Proceedings of the IFIP WG8.1/WG8.2 Working Conference', Atlanta, GA, USA.
8. Marshall, C. (1999), Enterprise Modeling with UML, Addison Wesley, Reading.
9. Mendling, J., Neumann, G. & Nüttgens, M. (2005), A comparison of XML interchange formats for business process modelling, in L. Fischer, ed., 'Workflow Handbook 2005', Workflow Management Coalition, Lighthouse Point, Florida, USA, pp. 185-198.
10. OMG (2004), UML 2.0 superstructure specification, Technical report. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2004-10-02.
11. Opdahl, A. & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2002), 'Ontological evaluation of the UML using the Bunge-Wand-Weber model', Software and System Modeling 1(1), 43-67.
12. Rolland, C. (1997), A primer for method engineering, in 'Proceedings of the INFormatique des ORganisations et Systèmes d'Information et de Décision (INFORSID'97)', Toulouse, France.
13. Rolland, C. (1998), A comprehensive view of process engineering, in B. Pernici & C. Thanos, eds, 'Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'98)', Vol. 1413 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Pisa, Italy.
14. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A., Edmond, D. & van der Aalst, W. (2005), Workflow data patterns: Identification, representation and tool support, in 'Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'2005)', Springer, Klagenfurt, Austria.
15. Russell, N., van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A. & Edmond., D. (2005), Workflow resource patterns: Identification, representation and tool support., in O. Pastor & J. Falcao é Cunha, eds, 'Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'05)', Vol. 3520 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Porto, Portugal, pp. 216-232. (Pubitemid 41336105)
16. Scheer, A.-W. (2000), ARIS - Business Process Modelling, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
17. van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B. & Barros, A. (2003), 'Workflow patterns', Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(3), 5-51.
18. Vernadat, F. (1996), Enterprise Modeling and Integration, Chapman and Hall, London.
19. WFMC (1999), Workflow management coalition terminology and glossary, document status - issue 3.0, Technical Report WFMCTC-1011, Workflow Management Coalition. http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1011-term-glossary-v3.pdf.
20. White, S. (2004), Process modeling notations and workflow patterns, in L. Fischer, ed., 'Workflow Handbook 2004', Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point, FL, USA., pp. 265-294.
21. Wohed, P., Perjons, E., Dumas, M. & ter Hofstede, A. (2003), Pattern based analysis of EAI languages - the case of the business modeling language, in O. Camp & M. Piattini, eds, 'Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003)', Vol. 3, Escola Superior de Tecnologia do Instituto Politecnico de Setubal, Angers, France, pp. 174-184.
22. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A. & Russell, N. (2005), Pattern-based analysis of UML activity diagrams, in 'Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'2005)', Springer, Klagenfurt, Austria.
23. zur Muehlen, M. & Rosemann, M. (2004), Multiparadigm process management, in J. Grundspenkis & M. Kirikova, eds, 'Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Development, and Support (BPMDS '04), held in conjunction with the Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE) 2004', Vol. 2, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia, pp. 169-175.