Model-driven approach to developing domain functional requirements in software product lines

IET Software

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 391-401

  Guo, J ^a   Wang, Y ^a   Zhang, Z ^b   Nummenmaa, J ^b   Niu, N ^c  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^c MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMONALITY AND VARIABILITY; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; DOMAIN EXPERTS; DOMAIN REQUIREMENTS; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; HOME SECURITY SYSTEMS; MANUAL OPERATIONS; META MODEL; MODEL DRIVEN APPROACH; PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS; SEMANTIC FRAMEWORK; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE (SPLS);

MERGING; SEMANTICS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 84866663569     PISSN: 17518806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1049/iet-sen.2010.0072     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Clements, P., and Northrop, L.: ' Software product lines: practices and patterns ', (Addison-Wesley, 2001)
2. Pohl, K., Bockle, G., and van der Linden, F.: ' Software product line engineering: foundations, principles, and techniques ', (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005)
3. Sugumaran, V., Park, S., and Kang, K.C.: ' Software product line engineering: introduction ', Commun. ACM, 2006, 49, (12), p. 28-32 10.1145/1183236.1183260 0001-0782
4. Krueger, C.W.: ' Easing the transition to software mass customization ', Proc. PFE'01, Bilbao, Spain, 2001, p. 282-293
5. Niu, N., and Easterbrook, S.: ' Extracting and modeling product line functional requirements ', Proc. RE'08, Barcelona, Spain, 2008, p. 155-164
6. Prieto-Diaz, R.: ' Domain analysis for reusability ', Proc. COMPSAC'87, Tokyo, Japan, 1987, p. 23-29
7. de Almeida, E., Mascena, J., and Cavalcanti, A.: et al. ' The domain analysis concept revisited: a practical approach ', Proc. ICSR'06, Turin, Italy, 2006, p. 43-57
8. ' Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study ', Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-021, 1990
9. Griss, M.L., Favaro, J., and Alessandro, M.d.: ' Integrating feature modeling with the RSEB ', Proc. ICSR'98, Victoria, Canada, 1998, p. 76-85
10. Coplien, J., Hoffman, D., and Weiss, D.: ' Commonality and variability in software engineering ', IEEE Softw., 1998, 15, (6), p. 37-45 10.1109/52.730836 0740-7459
11. Moon, M., Chae, H.S., and Yeom, K.: ' An approach to developing domain requirements as a core asset based on commonality and variability analysis in a product line ', IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 2005, 31, (7), p. 551-569 10.1109/TSE.2005.76 0098-5589
12. Fillmore, C.: ' The case for case ', Bach, E., Harms, R., Universals in linguistic theory, (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1968), p. 1-88
13. Zhang, Z.: ' Model component reuse - Conceptual foundations and application in the metamodel-based systems analysis and design environment ', 2004, Doctoral, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla Studies in Computing 39
14. France, R., and Rumpe, B.: ' Model-driven development of complex software: a research roadmap ', Proc. ICSE 2007, Workshop on the Future of Software Engineering, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2007, p. 37-54
15. Sendall, S., and Kozaczynski, W.: ' Model transformation: the heart and soul of model-driven software development ', IEEE Softw., 2003, 20, (5), p. 42-45 10.1109/MS.2003.1231150 0740-7459
16. Liaskos, S., Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Yu, E., and Mylopoulos, J.: ' On goal-based variability acquisition and analysis ', Proc. RE'06, Minneapolis, USA, 2006
17. Sommerville, I.: ' Software engineering ', (Pearson Education Limited, 2007)
18. Kalnins, A., and Celms, J.B.E.: ' Model transformation language MOLA ', Proc. MDAFA'04, Linköping, Sweden, 2004, p. 62-76
19. http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.0/, accessed 2011
20. Jouault, F., and Kurtev, I.: ' Transforming models with ATL ', Proc. MoDELS'05, Model Transformations in Practice Workshop, Montego Bay, Jamaica, 2005, p. 128-138
21. Deelstra, S., Sinnema, M., and Bosch, J.: ' Product derivation in software product families: a case study ', J. Syst. Softw., 2005, 74, (2), p. 173-194 10.1016/j.jss.2003.11.012 0164-1212
22. Kalnins, A., Celms, E., and Sostaks, A.: ' Tool support for MOLA ', Electron. Notes in Theor. Comput. Sci., 2006, 152, p. 83-96 10.1016/j.entcs. 2006.01.016
23. Dumitru, H., Gibiec, M., and Hariri, N.: et al. ' On-demand feature recommendations derived from mining public product descriptions ', Proc. ICSE'11, Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA, 2011, p. 181-190
24. Guo, J., Zhang, Z., and Wang, Y.: ' Model-driven derivation of domain functional requirements from use cases ', J. Softw. Eng. Appl., 2010, 3, (9), p. 875-881 10.4236/jsea.2010.39102
25. Yue, T., Briand, L.C., and Labiche, Y.: ' A systematic review of transformation approaches between user requirements and analysis models ', Requir. Eng., 2010, 16, (2), p. 75-99 10.1007/s00766-010-0111-y 0947-3602
26. Kang, K.C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K., Shin, E., and Huh, M.: ' FORM: a feature-oriented reuse method with domain-specific reference architectures ', Ann. Softw. Eng., 1998, 5, (1), p. 143-168 10.1023/A:1018980625587 1022-7091
27. Jacobson, I., Griss, M., and Jonsson, P.: ' Software reuse: architecture process and organization for business success ', (ACM Press, 1997)
28. Weiss, D.M., and Lai, C.T.R.: ' Product-line engineering: a family-based software development process ', (Addison-Wesley, 1999)
29. Muthig, D., and Atkinson, C.: ' Model-driven product line architectures ', Proc. SPLC'02, San Diego, CA, USA, 2002, p. 110-129
30. Kim, S.D., Min, H.G., Her, J.S., and Chang, S.H.: ' DREAM: a practical product line engineering using model driven architecture ', Proc. ICITA'05, Sydney, Australia, 2005, p. 70-75
31. Voelter, M., and Groher, I.: ' Product line implementation using aspect-oriented and model-driven software development ', Proc. SPLC'07, Kyoto, Japan, 2007, p. 233-242
32. Childs, A., Greenwald, J., Jung, G., Hoosier, M., and Hatcliff, J.: ' CALM and Cadena: metamodeling for component-based product-line development ', Computer, 2006, 39, (2), p. 42-50 10.1109/MC.2006.51 0018-9162
33. IEEE Standards Board: 'IEEE recommended practice for software requirements specifications' (1998)
34. Lauenroth, K., and Pohl, K.: ' Dynamic consistency checking of domain requirements in product line engineering ', Proc. RE'08, Barcelona, Spain, 2008, p. 193-202