An approach to developing domain requirements as a core asset based on commonality and variability analysis in a product line

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 551-569

  Moon, Mikyeong ^a   Yeom, Keunhyuk ^a   Chae, Heung Seok ^a  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Commonality; Core asset; Domain analysis; Product line; Requirement engineering; Reuse; Variability

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METADATA; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

COMMONALITY ANALYSIS; CORE ASSETS; DOMAIN ANALYSIS; DOMAIN REQUIREMENTS; PRODUCT LINE; VARIABILITY ANALYSIS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 25844465686     PISSN: 00985589     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2005.76     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. D. Muthig and C. Atkinson, "Model-Driven Product Line Architecture," Proc. Second Software Product Line Conf., Aug. 2002.
2. S.R. Faulk, "Product-Line Requirements Specification (PRS): An Approach and Case Study," Proc. Fifth IEEE Int'l Symp. Requirements Eng., pp. 48-55 2001.
3. P. Clements and L. Northrop, Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison Wesley, 2001.
4. M. Moon and K. Yeom, "Domain Design Method to Support Effective Reuse in Component-Based Software Development," Proc. First ACIS Int'l Conf. Software Eng. Research and Applications, pp. 149-154, 2003.
5. D. Creps, C. Klingler, L. Levine, and D. Allemang, "Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook Version 2.0," Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS), 1996.
6. M. Berard, Essays in Object-Oriented Software Engineering. Prentice-Hall, 1992.
7. A. Wierzbicka, Semantic Primitives. Frankfurt: Athenäum Verlag, 1972
8. G. Kotonya and I. Sommerville, "Requirements Engineering with Viewpoints," Software Eng. J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 5-18, Jan. 1996.
9. D.M. Weiss and C.T.R. Lai, Software Product-Line Engineering: A Family-Based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
10. I. Jacobson, M. Griss, and P. Jonsson, Software Reuse - Architecture, Process, and Organization for Business Success. Addison-Wesley, 1997.
11. G. Halmans and K. Pohl, "Communicating the Variability of Software-Product Family to Customers," Proc. Software and System Modeling, vol. 2, pp. 15-36, Feb. 2003.
12. B.C. Kang and Y.H. Kim, "Domain Requirement Definition," Technical Report EA20030536_0201_0101 Version 1.0, Electronics and Telecomm. Research Inst. (ETRI) and Daewoo Information Systems Corporation, 2003.
13. S.I. Han, "PR-Context-Matrix," Technical Report EA20030536 0201_0104 Version 1 0, Electronics and Telecomm. Research Inst. (ETRI) and Daewoo Information Systems Corporation, 2003.
14. B.C. Kang and J.W. Kim, "Domain Usecase Model," Technical Report EA20030536_0202_0202 Version 1.0, Electronics and Telecomm. Research Inst. (ETRI) and Daewoo Information Systems Corporation, 2003.
15. Y.H. Kim, "PR-Usecase Matrix," Technical Report EA20030536 0201_0204 Version 1.0, Electronics and Telecomm. Research Inst. (ETRI) and Daewoo Information Systems Corporation, 2003.
16. B.C. Kang, "Project Plan," Technical Report EA20030536 0202_0102 Version 1.1, Daewoo Information Systems Corporation, 2003.
17. S.I. Han and J.W. Kim, "Usecase Model," Technical Report, EA20030536 0202_0302, Version 1.1, Daewoo Information Systems Corporation, 2003.
18. IBM RequisitePro, http://www.ibm.com/softwarelawdtools/reqpro/, 2004.
19. Telelogic DOORS, http://www.telelogic.com/, 2004.
20. OMG, XMI Metadata Interchange (XMI) 2.0, http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/ 03-05-02.pdf, 2003.
21. I. Sommerville and G. Kotonya, Requirements Engineering Processes and Techniques. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 1998.
22. B. Nuseibeh and S. Easterbrook, "Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap," The Future of Software Eng., pp. 37-46, 2000.
23. J. Kuusela and J. Savolainen, "Requirements Engineering for Product Families," Proc. 22nd Int'l Conf. Software Eng. (ICSE '00), pp. 60-68, June 2000.
24. J.M Thompson and M.P. E. Heimdahl, "Structuring Product Family Requirements for N-Dimensional and Hierarchical Product Lines," Requirements Eng., pp. 42-54, Apr. 2003.
25. G. Chastek, P. Donohoe, K. Kang, and S. Thiel, "Product Line Analysis: A Practical Introduction," Technical Report CMU/ SEI-2001-TR-001, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., 2001.
26. K. Kang S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and S. Peterson, "Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study," Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Eng. Inst., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Nov. 1990.
27. K.C. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, and K. Kim, "FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain Specific Reference Architectures," Annals of Software Eng., vol 5, pp. 143-168, 1998.
28. M. Criss, J. Favaro, and M. d'Alessandro, "Integrating Feature Modeling with the RSEB," Proc. Fifth Int'l Conf. Software Reuse, pp. 76-85, 1998.
29. J. Coplien, D. Hoffman and D. Weiss, "Commonality and Variability in Software Engineering," IEEE Software, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 37-45, 1998.