Consumer preferences for verified dairy cattle management practices in processed dairy products

Food Control

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 298-305

  Olynk, Nicole J ^a   Ortega, David L ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal welfare; Consumer demand; Credence attribute; Dairy products; Verification; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; BOS;

EID: 84866663060     PISSN: 09567135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.030     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alfnes F. Stated preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: application of a mixed logit model. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2004, 31:19-37.
2. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., Lagerkvist C.J. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. European Review of Agricultural Economics 2007, 34:321-344.
3. Carlsson F., Frykblom P., Lagerkvist C.J. Farm animal welfare-testing for market failure. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2007, 39:61-73.
4. Caswell J.A. How labeling of safety and process attributes affects markets for food. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 1998, 27:151-158.
5. Caswell J.A., Mojduszka E.M. Using informational labeling to influence the market for quality in food products. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1996, 78:1248-1253.
6. Frewer L.J., Kole A., Van de Kroon S.A.A., de Lauwere C. Consumer attitudes towards the development of animal-friendly husbandry systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 2005, 18:345-367.
7. Hole A. A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. Health Economics 2007, 16:827-840.
8. Krinsky I., Robb A.L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics 1986, 64:715-719.
9. Lijenstolpe C. Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production. Agribusiness 2008, 21:67-84.
10. Loureiro M.L., Umberger W.J. A choice experiment model for beef: what US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling, and traceability. Food Policy 2007, 32:496-514.
11. Lusk J.L. Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003, 85:840-856.
12. Lusk J.L., Norwood F.B. Effect of experimental design on choice-based conjoint valuation estimates. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 87:771-785.
13. Lusk J.L., Norwood F.B., Pruitt J.R. Consumer demand for a ban on antibiotic drug use in pork production. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2006, 88:1015-1033.
14. Lusk J.L., Roosen J., Fox J. Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2003, 85:16-29.
15. Norwood F.B., Lusk J.L. Compassion by the pound: the economics of farm animal welfare 2011, Oxford University Press, New York.
16. Olynk N.J., Tonsor G.T., Wolf C.A. Consumer willingness to pay for livestock credence attribute claim verification. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2010, 35:261-280.
17. Olynk N.J., Wolf C.A., Tonsor G.T. Labeling of credence attributes in livestock production: verifying attributes which are more than "meet the eye" Journal of Food Law and Policy 2009, 5:181-200.
18. Ortega D.L., Holly Wang H., Olynk N., Wu L., Bai J. Chinese consumers' demand for food safety attributes: a push for Government and industry regulations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2012, 94:489-495.
19. Ortega D.L., Holly Wang H., Wu L., Olynk N. Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in China. Food Policy 2011, 36:318-324.
20. Poe G.L., Giraud K.L., Loomis J.B. Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2005, 87:353-365.
21. Revelt D., Train K. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80:647-657.
22. Scarpa R., Del Giudice T. Market segmentation via mixed logit: extra virgin olive oil in urban Italy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization 2004, 2:1-18.
23. Tonsor G.T., Olynk N., Wolf C. Consumer preferences for animal welfare attributes: the case of gestation crates. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2009, 41:713-730.
24. Tonsor G.T., Schroeder T.C., Fox J.A., Biere A. European preferences for beef steak attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2005, 30:367-380.
25. Tonsor G.T., Wolf C.A. Effect of video information on consumers: milk production attributes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2012, 94:503-508.
26. Train K.E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. United States Department of Agriculture Grain Inspection. Packers and stockyards administration federal grain inspection service directive 9180.79. Appendix 1 - process verified program, 1-29-07. Available at: http://archive.gipsa.usda.gov/reference-library/directives/9180-79.pdf.
28. Wolf C.A., Tonsor G.T., Olynk N.J. Understanding US consumer demand for milk production attributes. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2011, 36:326-342.