Reproducibility of trabecular bone structure measurements of the distal radius at 1.5 and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 623-626

  Baum, Thomas ^a   Dütsch, Yvonne ^a   Müller, Dirk ^a,b   Monetti, Roberto ^c   Sidorenko, Irina ^c   Räth, Christoph ^c   Rummeny, Ernst J ^a   Link, Thomas M ^d   Bauer, Jan S ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR EXTRATERRESTRISCHE PHYSIK   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

distal radius; MRI; osteoporosis; reproducibility; trabecular bone structure

Indexed keywords

BONE;

DISTAL RADIUS; MEASUREMENTS OF; OSTEOPOROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITIES; ROOT MEAN SQUARE; STRUCTURE MEASUREMENT; TRABECULAR BONE STRUCTURES;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE STRUCTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIUS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THICKNESS; TRABECULAR BONE;

EID: 84866659458     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31825f9aa3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94:569-573.
2. Cole ZA, Dennison EM, Cooper C. Osteoporosis epidemiology update. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10:92-96.
3. Adams JE. Quantitative computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:415-424.
4. Blake GM, Fogelman I. The clinical role of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:406-414.
5. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, et al. Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone. 2004;34:195-202.
6. Bauer JS, Link TM. Advances in osteoporosis imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:440-449.
7. Krug R, Burghardt AJ, Majumdar S, et al. High-resolution imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2010;48:601-621.
8. Chesnut CH III, Majumdar S, Newitt DC, et al. Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1548-1561.
9. Greenspan SL, Perera S, Recker R, et al. Changes in trabecular microarchitecture in postmenopausal women onbisphosphonate therapy. Bone. 2010;46:1006-1010.
10. Link TM, Vieth V, Matheis J, et al. Bone structure of the distal radius and the calcaneus vs BMD of the spine and proximal femur in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fractures. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:401-408.
11. Mueller D, Link TM, Monetti R, et al. The 3D-based scaling index algorithm: a new structure measure to analyze trabecular bone architecture in high-resolution MR images in vivo. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17:1483-1493.
12. Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, et al. Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Miner Res. 1997;12:111-118.
13. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, et al. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res. 1987;2:595-610.
14. Majumdar S, Newitt D, Mathur A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with x-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics. Osteoporos Int. 1996;6:376-385.
15. Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int. 1995;5:262-270.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
17. Alberich-Bayarri A, Marti-Bonmati L, Angeles PM, et al. Assessment of 2D and 3D fractal dimension measurements of trabecular bone from high-spatial resolution magnetic resonance images at 3 T. Med Phys. 2010;37:4930-4937.
18. Issever AS, Link TM, Newitt D, et al. Interrelationships between 3-T-MRIYderived cortical and trabecular bone structure parameters and quantitative-computed-tomography-derived bone mineral density. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:1299-1305.
19. Phan CM, Matsuura M, Bauer JS, et al. Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: comparison of MR imaging at 3.0 and 1.5 T with micro-CT as the standard of reference. Radiology. 2006;239:488-496.
20. Lam SC, Wald MJ, Rajapakse CS, et al. Performance of the MRI-based virtual bone biopsy in the distal radius: serial reproducibility and reliability of structural and mechanical parameters in women representative of osteoporosis study populations. Bone. 2011;49:895-903.