Is syntactic-category processing obligatory in visual word recognition? Evidence from Chinese

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1334-1360

  Wong, Andus Wing Kuen ^a   Chen, Hsuan Chih ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Chinese visual word recognition; Semantic ambiguity; Syntactic category ambiguity

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; ARTICLE; CHINESE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTIC MEMORY; STIMULATION; SYNTACTIC CATEGORY; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84866640437     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2011.603931     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Azuma, T. and Van Orden, G. C. 1997. Why SAFE is better than FAST: The relatedness of a word's meanings affects lexical decision times. Journal of Memory and Language, 36: 484-504.
2. Borowsky, R. and Masson, M. E. J. 1996. Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22: 63-85.
3. Chan, M. Y. 2004. Semantic and syntactic analyses in reading Chinese two-character words: Some preliminary studies (Undergraduate's Thesis). Chinese University of Hong Kong.
4. Chen, H.-C. 1992. "Reading comprehension in Chinese: Implications from character reading times". In Language processing in Chinese, Edited by: Chen, H.-C. and Tzeng, O. J. L. 175-205. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Company.
5. Chen, H.-C. 1999. "How do readers of Chinese process words during reading for comprehension?". In Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis, Edited by: Wang, J., Inhoff, A. W. and Chen, H.-C. 257-278. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Chen, H.-C. 2006. "Language processing: Implications from the study of Chinese". In Progress in psychological science around the world: Neural, cognitive, and developmental issues, Edited by: Jing, Q., Rosenzweig, M. R., d'Ydewalle, G., Zhang, H., Chen, H.-C. and Zhang, K. 367-381. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
7. Chen, H.-C., Cheung, H., Tang, S. L. and Wong, Y. T. 2000. Effects of antecedent order and semantic context on Chinese pronoun resolution. Memory & Cognition, 28: 427-438.
8. Chinese Character Database: With Word-formations. 2003. Retrieved August 30, 2006, from http://humanum.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexis/lexi-can/
9. Clark, H. H. 1973. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12: 335-359.
10. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P. and Haller, M. 1993. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100: 589-608.
11. Deutsch, A., Frost, R. and Forster, K. 1998. Verbs and nouns are organized and accessed differently in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24: 1238-1255.
12. Folk, J. R. and Morris, R. K. 2003. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: An eye movement analysis. Memory and Cognition, 31: 87-99.
13. Forster, K. I. and Forster, J. C. 2003. DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35: 116-124.
14. Frost, R. 1998. Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123: 71-99.
15. Garrett, M. F. 1976. "Syntactic processes in sentence production". In New approaches to language mechanism, Edited by: Wales, R. J. and Walker, E. 231-255. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland Publishing Company.
16. Gernsbacher, M. A. 1984. Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 256-281.
17. Gottlob, L. R., Goldinger, S. D., Stone, G. O. and Van Orden, G. C. 1999. Reading homographs: Orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25: 561-574.
18. Hino, Y. and Lupker, S. J. 1996. Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22: 1331-1356.
19. Hino, Y., Lupker, S. J. and Pexman, P. M. 2002. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28: 686-713.
20. Hino, Y., Pexman, P. M. and Lupker, S. J. 2006. Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding?. Journal of Memory and Language, 55: 247-273.
21. Holcomb, P. J. and Grainger, J. 2006. On the time course of visual word recognition: An event-related potential investigation using masked repetition priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18: 1631-1643.
22. Jastrzembski, J. E. 1981. Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13: 278-305.
23. Jastrzembski, J. E. and Stanners, R. F. 1975. Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon. Cognitive Psychology, 13: 278-305.
24. Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R. and Simpson, G. B. 1988. Lexical ambiguity and the time course of attentional allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14: 601-609.
25. Kim, M. and Thompson, C. K. 2000. Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74: 1-25.
26. Klein, D. E. and Murphy, G. L. 2001. The representation of polysemous words. Journal of Memory and Language, 45: 259-282.
27. Levelt, W. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S. 1999. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1-75.
29. Millis, M. L. and Button, S. B. 1989. The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don't. Memory and Cognition, 17: 141-147.
30. Müller, O. and Hagoort, P. 2006. Access to lexical information in language comprehension: Semantics before syntax. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18: 84-96.
31. O'Seaghdha, P. G. 1997. Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23: 807-828.
32. Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Schnur, T., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S.Rosa, M. M. 1999. The neural correlates of verb and noun processing: A PET study. Brain, 122: 2337-2344.
33. Pexman, P. M., Hino, Y. and Lupker, S. J. 2004. Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30: 1252-1270.
34. Pickering, M. J. and Branigan, H. P. 1998. The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39: 633-651.
35. Piercey, C. D. and Joordens, S. 2000. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 28: 657-666.
36. Rayner, K., Pacht, J. M. and Duffy, S. A. 1994. Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33: 527-544.
37. Rodd, J., Gaskell, G. and Marslen-Wilson, W. 2002. Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 46: 245-266.
38. Schiller, N. O., Schuhmann, T., Neyndorff, A. C. and Jansma, B. M. 2006. The influence of semantic category membership on syntactic decisions: A study using event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1082: 153-164.
39. Seidenberg, M. S. 1985. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19: 1-30.
40. Shapiro, K. and Caramazza, A. 2003. Grammatical processing of nouns and verbs in left frontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 41: 1189-1198.
41. Simpson, G. B. and Burgess, C. 1985. Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11: 28-39.
42. Swinney, D. A. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18: 645-659.
43. Taft, M. and Van Graan, F. 1998. Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38: 203-224.
44. Tyler, L. K., Bright, P., Fletcher, P. and Stamatakis, E. A. 2004. Neural processing of nouns and verbs: The role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia, 42: 512-523.
45. Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hicock, G., Growdon, J. H.Koroshetz, W. J. 1997. A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9: 266-276.
46. Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H. and Cappa, S. F. 2011. Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35: 407-426.
47. Wang, S., Zhu, Z., Zhang, J. X., Wang, Z., Xiao, Z.Xiang, H. 2008. Broca's area plays a role in syntactic processing during Chinese reading comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 46: 1371-1378.
48. Wong, A. W.-K., & Chen, H.-C. 2011. The effect of number of meanings in recognizing Chinese single-character words. Manuscript in preparation.
49. Yu, B., Zhang, W., Jing, Q., Peng, R., Zhang, G. and Simon, H. A. 1985. STM capacity for Chinese and English language materials. Memory and Cognition, 13: 202-207.
50. Zhang, Y., Yu, J. and Boland, J. E. 2010. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36: 765-781.
51. Zhou, X. and Marslen-Wilson, W. 2000. The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26: 1245-1265.