Rehabilitation of the edentulous posterior maxilla after sinus floor elevation using deproteinized bovine bone: A 9-year clinical study

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 422-426

  Oliveira, Rita ^a   El Hage, Marc ^b   Carrel, Jean Pierre ^b   Lombardi, Tommaso ^b   Bernard, Jean Pierre ^b  

^a University of Geneva ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biomaterial; Dental implant; Sinus elevation

Indexed keywords

BIO OSS; BIO-OSS; MINERAL; TITANIUM;

ADULT; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CATTLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CATTLE; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MAXILLARY SINUS; MIDDLE AGED; MINERALS; SINUS FLOOR AUGMENTATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84866618303     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182691873     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Astrand P, Ahlqvist J, Gunne J, et al. Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10:207-217.
2. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, et al. Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3:7-26.
3. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am. 1986;30:207-229.
4. Boyne PJ, James R. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613-618.
5. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, et al. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24:565-577.
6. Kaptein ML, Hoogstraten J, de Putter C, et al. Dental implants in the atrophic maxilla: measurements of patients' satisfaction and treatment experience. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:321-326.
7. Scarano A, Degidi M, Iezzi G, et al. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dent. 2006;15:197-207.
8. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent. 1993;2:158-167.
9. Peetz M. Characterization of xenogeneic bone material. In: Boyne PJ, ed. Osseous Reconstruction of the Maxilla and the Mandible. Chicago, IL: Quintessence; 1997:87-100.
10. Haas R, Donath K, Födinger M, et al. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus grafting: comparative histomorphometric findings in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:107-116.
11. Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, et al. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:835-840.
12. Steigenga JT, al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, et al. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2003;12:306-317.
13. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:161-172.
14. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:144-153.
15. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J. Report of 1633 implants in 814 augmented sinus areas in function for up to 180 months. Implant Dent. 2007;16:369-378.
16. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze- Mosgau S, et al. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:53-58.
17. Artzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Nemcovsky CE, et al. The amount of newly formed bone in sinus grafting procedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type and residual amount of the grafted material. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:193-199.
18. Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Cho SC, et al. Sinus augmentation utilizing anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: histomorphometric and clinical analyses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:551-559.
19. Valentini P, Abensur D, Wenz B, et al. Sinus grafting with porous bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for implant placement: a 5-year study on 15 patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20: 245-253.
20. Merkx MA, Maltha JC, Stoelinga PJ. Assessment of the value of anorganic bone additives in sinus floor augmentation: a review of clinical reports. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:1-6.
21. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17:635-643.
22. Solar P, Geyerhofer U, Traxler H, et al. Blood supply to the maxillary sinus relevant to sinus floor elevation procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10:34-44.
23. Sartori S, Silvestri M, Forni F, et al. Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A case report with histomorphometric evaluation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2003;14:369-372.
24. Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, et al. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateral sinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placement in 12 patients: part 3 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 20:117-125.
25. Asai S, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. Maxillary sinus augmentation model in rabbits: effect of occluded nasal ostium on new bone formation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:405-409.
26. Xu H, Shimizu Y, Asai S, Ooya K. Grafting of deproteinized bone particles inhibits bone resorption after maxillary sinus floor elevation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:126-133.
27. Hising P, Bolin A, Branting C. Reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridge crests with dental implants using a bovine bone mineral for augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16: 90-97.
28. John HD, Wenz B. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:199-207.
29. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991;62:2-4.
30. Haas R, Mailath G, Dörtbudak O, et al. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus augmentation: analysis of interfacial bond strength of dental implants using pull-out tests. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:117-122.
31. Javed F, Almas K, Crespi R, et al. Implant surface morphology and primary stability: is there a connection? Implant Dent. 2011;20:40-46.
32. Viornery C, Guenther HL, Aronsson BO, et al. Osteoblast culture on polished titanium disks modified with phosphonic acids. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;62:149-155.
33. Boyan BD, Bonewald LF, Paschalis EP, et al. Osteoblastmediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71:519-529.
34. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1523-1539.