Augmented reality visualization with use of image overlay technology for MR imaging-guided interventions: Assessment of performance in cadaveric shoulder and hip arthrography at 1.5 T

Radiology

Volumn 265, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 254-259

  Fritz, Jan ^a   U Thainual, Paweena ^b,c   Ungi, Tamas ^c   Flammang, Aaron J ^d   Fichtinger, Gabor ^c   Iordachita, Iulian I ^b   Carrino, John A ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTICLE; AUGMENTED REALITY; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HIP ARTHROGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NEEDLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SHOULDER ARTHROGRAPHY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CADAVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INJECTIONS, INTRA-ARTICULAR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHOULDER JOINT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84866611108     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112640     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Miller TT. MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip after fluoroscopic landmarking. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29(2):81-84. (Pubitemid 30156410)
2. Mulligan ME. CT-guided shoulder arthrography at the rotator cuff interval. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(2):W58-W61.
3. Dépelteau H, Bureau NJ, Cardinal E, Aubin B, Brassard P. Arthrography of the shoulder: a simple fluoroscopically guided approach for targeting the rotator cuff interval. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(2):329-332. (Pubitemid 38116571)
4. Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session: MR arthrography. RadioGraphics 2002;22(5):1223-1246.
5. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 2000;216(1):180-184. (Pubitemid 30434740)
6. Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, McAdams HP, Yoshizumi TT. CT fluoroscopy - guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology 2001;220(1):161-167. (Pubitemid 32577978)
7. Petersilge CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Hatem SF. MR arthrography of the shoulder: rethinking traditional imaging procedures to meet the technical requirements of MR imaging guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(5):1453-1457. (Pubitemid 27452520)
8. Graves MJ, Wakely S, Bearcroft PW, et al. MR-guided direct arthrography of the hip. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28(2): 462-465.
9. Soh E, Bearcroft PW, Graves MJ, Black R, Lomas DJ. MR-guided direct arthrography of the glenohumeral joint. Clin Radiol 2008; 63(12):1336-1341; discussion 1342-1343.
10. Fritz J, U-Thainual P, Ungi T, et al. Augmented reality visualization with image overlay for MRI-guided intervention: accuracy for lumbar spinal procedures with a 1.5-T MRI system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198(3):W266-W273.
11. Vikal S, U-Thainual P, Carrino JA, Iordachita I, Fischer GS, Fichtinger G. Perk Station: percutaneous surgery training and performance measurement platform. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2010;34(1):19-32.
12. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253.
13. Kilcoyne RF, Kaplan P. The lateral approach for hip arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 1992;21(4):239-240.
14. Sonnad SS. Describing data: statistical and graphical methods. Radiology 2002;225(3):622-628. (Pubitemid 35387093)
15. Redondo MV, Berná-Serna JD, Campos PA, et al. MR arthrography of the shoulder using an anterior approach: optimal injection site. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191(5): 1397-1400.
16. Valls R, Melloni P. Sonographic guidance of needle position for MR arthrography of the shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(3):845-847.
17. Trattnig S, Breitenseher M, Rand T, et al. MR imaging-guided MR arthrography of the shoulder: clinical experience on a conventional closed high-field system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172(6):1572-1574. (Pubitemid 29242339)
18. Weiss CR, Nour SG, Lewin JS. MR-guided biopsy: a review of current techniques and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27(2):311-325. (Pubitemid 351222537)
19. Fritz J, Thomas C, Clasen S, Claussen CD, Lewin JS, Pereira PL. Freehand real-time MRI-guided lumbar spinal injection procedures at 1.5 T: feasibility, accuracy, and safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192(4):W161-W167.
20. Hata N, Tokuda J, Hurwitz S, Morikawa S. MRI-compatible manipulator with remote-center-of-motion control. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27(5):1130-1138. (Pubitemid 351614627)
21. Tokuda J, Fischer GS, Csoma C, et al. Software strategy for robotic transperineal prostate therapy in closed-bore MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2008;11(Pt 2):701-709.
22. Christoforou E, Akbudak E, Ozcan A, Karanikolas M, Tsekos NV. Performance of interventions with manipulator-driven real-time MR guidance: implementation and initial in vitro tests. Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(1):69-77. (Pubitemid 46048937)
23. Busse H, Garnov N, Thörmer G, et al. Flexible add-on solution for MR image-guided interventions in a closed-bore scanner environment. Magn Reson Med 2010;64(3): 922-928.
24. Wacker FK, Vogt S, Khamene A, et al. An augmented reality system for MR image-guided needle biopsy: initial results in a swine model. Radiology 2006;238(2): 497-504. (Pubitemid 43134362)
25. Silverman SG, Collick BD, Figueira MR, et al. Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system. Radiology 1995;197(1):175-181.