The conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in the office (CAMBO) trial: Masked hypertension sub-study

Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1937-1941

  Myers, Martin G ^a   Godwin, Marshall ^b   Dawes, Martin ^c   Kiss, Alexander ^a   Tobe, Sheldon W ^a   Kaczorowski, Janusz ^d  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

blood pressure measurement; hypertension diagnosis; masked hypertension

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL MANUAL OFFICE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION;

EID: 84866558888     PISSN: 02636352     EISSN: 14735598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328356abd3     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J. Measurement of blood pressure in the office. Recognizing the problem and proposing the solution. Hypertension 2010; 55:195-200.
2. Papadopoulos DP, Makris TK. Masked hypertension definition, impact, outcomes: a critical review. J Clin Hypertens 2007; 9:956-963.
3. Verberk WJ, Kessels AGH, de Leeuw PW. Prevalence, causes, and consequences of masked hypertension: a meta-analysis. Am J Hyper-tens 2008; 21:969-975.
4. Bobrie G, Clerson P, Ménard J, Postel-Vinay N, Chatellier G, Plouin P-F. Masked hypertension: a systematic review. J Hypertens 2008; 26:1715-1725.
5. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M, Kiss A, Tobe SW, Grant FC, Kaczorowski J. Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomized parallel design controlled trial. BMJ 2011; 342:d286.
6. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Optimum frequency of automated blood pressure measurements using an automated sphygmomanom-eter. Blood Press Monit 2008; 13:333-338.
7. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Chessman M, Kiss A. Can sphygmomanom-eters designed for self-measurement of blood pressure in the home be used in office practice? Blood Press Monit 2010; 15:300-304.
8. Beckett L, Godwin M. The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2005; 5:18.
9. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Use of automated office blood pressure measurement to reduce the white coat response. J Hypertens 2009; 27:280-286.
10. Myers MG, Valdivieso M, Kiss A. Consistent relationship between automated office blood pressure recorded in different settings. Blood Press Monit 2009; 14:108-111.
11. Myers MG, Tobe SW. Prevalence of masked hypertension with automated office blood pressure measurement. J Clin Hypertens 2009; 11 (Suppl A):A81.
12. Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, Thien T, Lenders JWM, van Montfrans GA, Smit AJ, deLeeuw PW. Prevalence of the white-coat effect at multiple visits before and during treatment. J Hypertens 2006; 24:2357-2363.
13. Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, Tsakanikas AP, Chaveles IA, Mousoulis GP. Automated office blood pressure and ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens 2011; 24:661-666.