European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition Professional requirements and training

Endoscopy

Volumn 44, Issue SUPPL3, 2012, Pages

  Steele, R J C ^a   Rey, J F ^b   Lambert, R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUT ARNAULT TZANCK   (France)

^c INTERNATIONAL AGENCY FOR RESEARCH ON CANCER   (France)

Author keywords

colorectal neoplasms; mass screening; multidisciplinary evidence based guidelines; population based programmes; professional requirements; training

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; WARFARIN;

ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; BARIUM ENEMA; CANCER CONTROL; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER THERAPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLON BIOPSY; COLON RADIOGRAPHY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; EUROPE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LABORATORY PERSONNEL; LABORATORY TEST; LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDLINE; MORBIDITY; NURSE; POLYPECTOMY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SURGEON; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; EUROPEAN UNION; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PATIENT CARE TEAM; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84866532262     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309796     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Aslinia F., Uradomo L., Steele A. et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 721 731
2. Atkin W., Rogers P., Cardwell C. et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology: 2004; 126 1247 1256 (Pubitemid 38552789)
3. Atkin W., Valori R., Kuipers E. J. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE151 SE163
4. Austoker J., Giordano L., Hewitson P. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Communication. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE164 SE185
5. Council of the European Union Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC). Off J Eur Union: 2003; 34 38
6. Ferlay J., Shin H. R., Bray F. et al. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. Internet Lyon, France International Agency for Research on Cancer: 2010; Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr Accessed on 05/04/2012
7. Ferreira M. R., Dolan N. C., Fitzgibbon M. L. et al. Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol: 2005; 23 1548 1554
8. Fleissig A., Jenkins V., Catt S. et al. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol: 2006; 7 935 943 (Pubitemid 44615953)
9. Halloran S., Launoy G., Zappa M. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Faecal Occult Blood Testing. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE65 SE87
10. Landsorp-Vogelaar I., von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Introduction. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE15 SE30
11. Lane D. S., Messina C. R., Cavanagh M. F. et al. A provider intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening in county health centers. Med Care: 2008; 46 109 116
12. Malila N., Senore C., Armaroli P. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Organisation. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE31 SE48
13. Minozzi S., Armaroli P., Banzi R. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Appendix 1: Systematic evidence review.: 2010; http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/european- guidelines-for-quality-assurance-in-colorectal-cancer-screening-and-diagnosis- pbND3210390/ Accessed 11/2/2012
14. Minozzi S., Armaroli P., Segnan N. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Principles of evidence assessment and methods for reaching recommendations. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE9 SE14
15. Morris M., Platell C. F. Surgical volume influences survival in patients undergoing resections for stage II colon cancers. ANZ J Surg: 2007; 77 902 906 (Pubitemid 47353076)
16. Moss S., Ancelle-Park R., Brenner H. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition Evaluation and interpretation of screening outcomes. Endoscopy: 2012
17. NHS Executive The NHS Cancer Plan and the New NHS. Report no. 264924 London: 2004
18. Public Health Resource Unit Bowel cancer Screening Programme Guidance for Public Health and Commissioners. BCSP Publication No 3 Sheffield NHS Cancer Screening Programmes: 2008
19. Quirke P., Risio M., Lambert R. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE116 SE130
20. Salz T., Sandler R. S. The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2008; 6 1185 1193
21. Scottish Bowel Screening Programme: 2010; http://www.bowelscreening.scot. nhs.co.uk/ Accessed 11/2/2012
22. Segnan N., Patnick J., von Karsa L. (eds.) European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First edition. Luxembourg European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union: 2010
23. Shorthouse A. Specialist Training a vision for the future. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland: 2009; 8 522 524
24. Steele R. J., McClements P. L., Libby G. et al. Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBT screening for colorectal cancer. Gut: 2009; 58 530 535
25. Steele R. JC, Pox C., Kuipers E. J. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Managment of lesions detected in colorectal cancer screening. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE140 SE150
26. Thomas-Gibson S., Bassett P., Suzuki N. et al. Intensive training over 5 days improves colonoscopy skills long-term. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 818 824 (Pubitemid 47386832)
27. Valori R., Rey J-F, Atkin W. et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: First edition. Quality assurance in endoscopy in colorectal screening and diagnosis. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 SE88 SE105
28. von Karsa L., Anttila A., Ronco G. et al. Cancer Screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening. First Report. Luxembourg European Commission: 2008; http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph-determinants/genetics/documents/ cancer-screening.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012
29. von Karsa L., Lignini T. A., Patnick J. et al. The dimensions of the CRC problem. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol: 2010; 24 381 396
30. Walsh J. M., Salazar R., Terdiman J. P. et al. Promoting use of colorectal cancer screening tests. Can we change physician behavior? J Gen Intern Med: 2005; 20 1097 1101 (Pubitemid 43110258)
31. Wilson J. M., Jungner Y. G. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease. World Health Organization: 1968; http://whqlibdoc.who.int/php/WHO-PHP- 34.pdf Accessed 11/2/2012