A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research

Spinal Cord

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 646-654

  Whitehurst, D G T ^a,b   Noonan, V K ^a,c,d   Dvorak, M F S ^a,c,d   Bryan, S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b VANCOUVER COASTAL HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION ON REPAIR DISCOVERIES   (Canada)

^d RICK HANSEN INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

outcome assessment; preference based; quality of life; spinal cord injury; systematic review; validity

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINANT VALIDITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; PARAPLEGIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SHORT FORM 12; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

EID: 84866512158     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: 14765624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.46     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Strauss DJ, Devivo MJ, Paculdo DR, Shavelle RM. Trends in life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 1079-1085.
2. Jang Y, Hsieh CL, Wang YH, Wu YH. A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1890-1895.
3. Moons P, Van Deyk K, Budts W, De Geest S. Caliber of quality-of-life assessments in congenital heart disease: A plea for more conceptual and methodological rigor. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2004; 158: 1062-1069.
4. Dijkers MP. Individualization in quality of life measurement: Instruments and approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(4 Suppl 2): S3-14.
5. Chapin MH, Miller SM, Ferrin JM, Chan F, Rubin SE. Psychometric validation of a subjective well-being measure for people with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1135-1142.
6. Groot W. Adaptation and scale of reference bias in self-assessments of quality of life. J Health Econ 2000; 19: 403-420.
7. Neumann P, Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC. Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care. Annu Rev Public Health 2000; 21: 587-611.
8. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: London, 2008.
9. Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004; 13: 873-884.
10. Pressler SJ, Eckert GJ, Morrison GC, Murray MD, Oldridge NB. Evaluation of the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 in heart failure. J Card Fail 2011; 17: 143-150.
11. Hill MR, Noonan VK, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. SCIRE Research Team. Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 438-450.
12. Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: Properties and applications. Ann Med 2001; 33: 328-336.
13. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: A psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 209-224.
14. Brooks R. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37: 53-72.
15. Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med 2001; 33: 375-384.
16. Seiber WJ, Groessl EJ, David KM, Ganiats TG, Kaplan RM. Quality of Well Being Self-Administered (QWB-SA) Scale User's Manual. Health Services Research Center: San Diego, CA, 2008, [available at https://hoap.ucsd.edu/qwb-info/ QWBManual. pdf]
17. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21: 271-292.
18. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Atherton Day N, McNeil H. Construction and utility scaling of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument. Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Monash University (Working Paper: Melbourne101, 2000.
19. Richardson J, Day N, Peacock S, Iezzi A. Measurement of the quality of life for economic evaluation and the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Mark 2 Instrument. Aust Econ Rev 2004; 37: 62-88.
20. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011; 20: 1727-1736.
21. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care 2004; 42: 851-859.
22. Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 877-884.
23. Barrera-Chacon JM, Mendez-Suarez JL, Jauregui-Abrisqueta ML, Palazon R, Barbara-Bataller E, Garcia-Obrero I. Oxycodone improves pain control and quality of life in anticonvulsant- pretreated spinal cord-injured patients with neuropathic pain. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 36-42.
24. Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Deyo RA. Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 117-125.
25. Dahlberg A, Alaranta H, Sintonen H. Health-related quality of life in persons with traumatic spinal cord lesion in Helsinki. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 312-316.
26. De Wolf A, Lane-Brown A, Tate RL, Middleton J, Cameron ID. Measuring community integration after spinal cord injury: validation of the Sydney psychosocial reintegration scale and community integration measure. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 1185-1193.
27. Gautschi OP, Seule MA, Cadosch D, Gores M, Ewelt C, Hildebrandt G et al. Healthrelated quality of life following spinal cordectomy for syringomyelia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2011; 153: 575-579.
28. Haagsma JA, Polinder S, van Beeck EF, Mulder S, Bonsel GJ. Alternative approaches to derive disability weights in injuries: Do they make a difference? Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 657-665.
29. Haagsma JA, van Beeck EF, Polinder S, Toet H, Panneman M, Bonsel GJ. The effect of comorbidity on health-related quality of life for injury patients in the first year following injury: Comparison of three comorbidity adjustment approaches. Popul Health Metr 2011; 9: 10.
30. Hollingworth W, Gray DT, Martin BI, Sullivan SD, Deyo RA, Jarvik JG. Rapid magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing cancer-related low back pain. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 303-312.
31. Holtslag HR, van Beeck EF, Lindeman E, Leenen LP. Determinants of long-term functional consequences after major trauma. J Trauma 2007; 62: 919-927.
32. Kannisto M, Sintonen H. Later health-related quality of life in adults who have sustained spinal cord injury in childhood. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 747-751.
33. Kannisto M, Merikanto J, Alaranta H, Hokkanen H, Sintonen H. Comparison of healthrelated quality of life in three subgroups of spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord 1998; 36: 193-199.
34. Lee BB, King MT, Simpson JM, Haran MJ, Stockler MR, Marial O et al. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population. Value Health 2008; 11: 680-688.
35. Meerding WJ, Looman CW, Essink-Bot ML, Toet H, Mulder S, van Beeck EF. Distribution and determinants of health and work status in a comprehensive population of injury patients. J Trauma 2004; 56: 150-161.
36. Phillips VL, Vesmarovich S, Hauber R, Wiggers E, Egner A. Telehealth: Reaching out to newly injured spinal cord patients. Public Health Rep 2001; 116(Suppl 1): 94-102.
37. Polinder S, van Beeck EF, Essink-Bot ML, Toet H, Looman CW, Mulder S et al. Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma 2007; 62: 133-141.
38. Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Bonsel G, Essink-Bot ML, Toet H, van Beeck EF. The measurement of long-term health-related quality of life after injury: Comparison of EQ-5D and the health utilities index. Inj Prev 2010; 16: 147-153.
39. Stevens SL, Caputo JL, Fuller DK, Morgan DW. Physical activity and quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31: 373-378.
40. Dijkers MPJM. Quality of life of individuals with spinal cord injury: A review of conceptualization, measurement, and research findings. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42(3 Suppl 1): 87-110.
41. Stadhouder A, Buckens CF, Holtslag HR, Oner FC. Are existing outcome instruments suitable for assessment of spinal trauma patients? J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 13: 638-647.
42. Wood-Dauphine'e S, Exner G, Bostanci B, Exner G, Glass C, Jochheim KAon behalf of the SCI Consensus Group. Quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury - basic issues, assessment, and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2002; 20: 135-149.
43. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
44. Mittmann N, Chan BC, Craven BC, Isogai PK, Houghton P. Evaluation of the costeffectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy for pressure ulcers in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 866-872.
45. Mittmann N, Craven BC, Gordon M, MacMillan DH, Hassouna M, Raynard W et al. Erectile dysfunction in spinal cord injury: A cost-utility analysis. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 358-364.
46. Phelps J, Albo M, Dunn K, Joseph A. Spinal cord injury and sexuality in married or partnered men: Activities, function, needs, and predictors of sexual adjustment. Arch Sex Behav 2001; 30: 591-602.
47. Whitehurst DGT, Bryan S, Lewis M. Systematic Review and Empirical Comparison of Contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D Group Mean Scores. Med Decis Making 2011; 31: E34-E44.
48. Chisholm D, Healey A, Knapp M. QALYs and mental healthcare. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 1997; 32: 68-75.
49. Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res 2012; 21: 167-176.
50. Dijkers MP. Searching the literature for information on traumatic spinal cord injury: The usefulness of abstracts. Spinal Cord 2003; 41: 76-84.