The measurement of long-term health-related quality of life after injury: Comparison of EQ-5D and the health utilities index

Injury Prevention

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 147-153

  Polinder, Suzanne ^a   Haagsma, Juanita A ^a   Bonsel, Gouke ^a   Essink Bot, Marie Louise ^b   Toet, Hidde ^c   van Beeck, Ed F ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c National Reference Laboratory   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF EVALUATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; WOUNDS AND INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955287403     PISSN: 13538047     EISSN: 14755785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ip.2009.022418     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russel LB, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
2. Segui-Gomez M, Mackenzie EJ. Measuring the public health impact of injuries. Epidemiol Rev 2003;25:3-19.
3. Van Beeck EF, Larsen CF, Lyons RA, et al. Guidelines for the conduction of follow-up studies measuring injury-related disability. J Trauma 2007;62:534-550.
4. Feeny DH, Furlong W, Boyle M, et al. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Pharmacoeconomics 1995;7:490-502.
5. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny DH, et al. Multi-attribute preference functions: Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995;7:503-520.
6. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health status. Med Care 1997;35:1095-108.
7. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996;37:53-72.
8. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddard GL, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
9. Janssen MF, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ. Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon's indices, dual Life Res 2007;16:895-904.
10. Bosch JL, Hunink MGM. Comparison of the health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication, dual Life Res 2000;9:591-601.
11. Glick HA, Polsky D, Willke RJ, et al. A comparison of preference assessment instruments used in a clinical trial: responses to the visual analog scale from the EuroQol EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index. Med Decis Making 1999;19:265-275.
12. Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 2005;60: 1571-1582.
13. Kopec JA, Willison KD. A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:317-325.
14. Luo N, Johnson JA, Shaw JW, et al. Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Med Care 2005;43:1078-1086.
15. Oostenbrink R, Ha Am, Essink-Bot ML. The EQ-5D and the Health Utilities Index for permanent sequelae after meningitis: a head-to-head comparison. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:791-799.
16. Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ, et al. An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures. The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the C00P/W0NCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care 1997;35:522-537.
17. Polinder S, Van Beeck EF, Essink-Bot ML, et al. Functional outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 months after injury in the Netherlands. J Trauma 2007;62:133-141.
18. Polinder S, Meerding WJ, Toet H, et al. Prevalence and prognostic factors of disability after childhood injury. Pediatrics 2005;116:810-817.
19. Lyons RA, Polinder S, Larsen CF, et al. Methodological issues in comparing injury incidence across countries. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2006;13:63-70.
20. Kind P, Hardman G, Macran S. UK population norms for EQ-5D. York: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, 1999.
21. Bouillon B, Kreder HJ, Eypasch E, et al. Quality of life in patients with multiple injuries - basic issues, assessment, and recommendations. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2002;20:125-134.
22. Krabbe PF, Stouthard ME, Essink-Bot ML, et al. The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:293-301.
23. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW. Health Utilities Index (HUI©) Procedures Manual: algorithm for determining HUI Mark 2 (HUI2)/Mark 3 (HUI3) health status classification levels, health states, single-attribute utility scores and overall health-related quality of life utility scores, from 15-item self-complete health states questionnaires. Hamilton, Ontario: Health Utilities Inc, 2000.
24. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong W, et al. Multi-attribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Index mark 2. Med Care 1996;34:702-722.
25. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, et al. Multiplicative, multi-attribute utility function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) system: a technical report. Hamilton, Canada: McMaster University; 1998, Centre for health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper No 98-111.
26. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
27. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
28. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 1948;27:379-423.
29. Janssen MF, Bernie E, Haagsma JA, et al. Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version. Value Health 2008;11:275-284.
30. Marra CA, Esdaile JM, Guh D, et al. A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 2004;42:1125-1131.
31. Hoeymans N, Llndert van H, Westert GP. The health status of the Dutch population as assessed by the EQ-6D. Qual Life Res 2005;14:655-663.