Differential Recruitment of Brain Networks following Route and Cartographic Map Learning of Spatial Environments

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Zhang, Hui ^a   Copara, Milagros ^a,b   Ekstrom, Arne D ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN NETWORK; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; ORIENTATION; PARAHIPPOCAMPAL GYRUS; RETROSPLENIAL CORTEX; SPATIAL ENVIRONMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BRAIN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; HUMANS; LEARNING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; NERVE NET; ORIENTATION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84866504650     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044886     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Wolbers T, Buchel C, (2005) Dissociable retrosplenial and hippocampal contributions to successful formation of survey representations. J Neurosci 25: 3333-3340.
2. Tolman EC, (1948) Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men. Psychol Rev 55: 189-208.
3. O'Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Klatzky R (1998) Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, Distinctions, and Interconnections. In: Freksa C, Habel C, Wender CF, editors. Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1-17.
5. Thorndyke PW, Hayes-Roth B, (1982) Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn Psychol 14: 560-589.
6. Moeser S, (1988) Cognitive Mapping in a Complex Building. Environment and Behavior 20: 21-48.
7. Richardson AE, Montello DR, Hegarty M, (1999) Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments. Mem Cognit 27: 741-750.
8. Hirtle SC, Hudson J, (1991) Acquisition of spatial knowledge for routes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11: 335-345.
9. Sholl MJ, (1999) Egocentric frames of reference used for the retrieval of survey knowledge learned by map and navigation. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1: 475-494.
10. Taylor HA, Naylor SJ, Chechile NA, (1999) Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspective. Memory & cognition 27: 309-319.
11. Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese HW, editor. Advances in child development and behavior. New York: Academic.
12. McNamara TP, Hardy JK, Hirtle SC, (1989) Subjective Hierarchies in Spatial Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 15: 211-227.
13. Shelton AL, Gabrieli JD, (2002) Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives. J Neurosci 22: 2711-2717.
14. Shelton AL, Pippitt HA, (2007) Fixed versus dynamic orientations in environmental learning from ground-level and aerial perspectives. Psychol Res 71: 333-346.
15. Latini-Corazzini L, Nesa MP, Ceccaldi M, Guedj E, Thinus-Blanc C, et al. (2010) Route and survey processing of topographical memory during navigation. Psychological research 74: 545-559.
16. Shelton AL, McNamara TP, (2004) Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30: 158-170.
17. Mou W, McNamara TP, Valiquette CM, Rump B, (2004) Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30: 142-157.
18. Rieser JJ, (1989) Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15: 1157-1165.
19. Holmes MC, Sholl MJ, (2005) Allocentric coding of object-to-object relations in overlearned and novel environments. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31: 1069-1087.
20. Waller D, Hodgson E, (2006) Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self-rotation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 32: 867-882.
21. Kelly JW, Avraamides MN, Loomis JM, (2007) Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments. Journal of experimental psychology Learning, memory, and cognition 33: 1092-1107.
22. Rossano MJ, West SO, Robertson TJ, Wayne MC, Chase RB, (1999) The acquisition of route and survey knowledge from computer models. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 101-115.
23. Epstein RA, Higgins JS, (2007) Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition. Cereb Cortex 17: 1680-1693.
24. McNaughton BL, Chen LL, Markus EJ, (1991) "Dead Reckoning," Landmark Learning, and the Sense of Direction: A Neurophysiological and Computational Hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3: 190-205.
25. Byrne P, Becker S, Burgess N, (2007) Remembering the past and imagining the future: a neural model of spatial memory and imagery. Psychological review 114: 340-375.
26. Burgess N, (2008) Spatial cognition and the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1124: 77-97.
27. Hashimoto R, Tanaka Y, Nakano I, (2010) Heading disorientation: a new test and a possible underlying mechanism. European neurology 63: 87-93.
28. Lambrey S, Doeller C, Berthoz A, Burgess N (2011) Imagining Being Somewhere Else: Neural Basis of Changing Perspective in Space. Cerebral cortex.
29. Costafreda SG, Fu CH, Lee L, Everitt B, Brammer MJ, et al. (2006) A systematic review and quantitative appraisal of fMRI studies of verbal fluency: role of the left inferior frontal gyrus. Human Brain Mapping 27: 799-810.
30. Thompson-Schill SL, (2003) Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring "how" from "where". Neuropsychologia 41: 280-292.
31. Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA, (2004) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 170-177.
32. Stark CE, Squire LR, (2001) When zero is not zero: the problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 12760-12766.
33. Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, et al. (1995) Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med 33: 636-647.