Adapt-a-ride: Understanding the dynamics of commuting preferences through an experience design framework

DPPI'11 - Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Ozenc, Fatih Kursat ^a   Cranor, Lorrie F ^a   Morris, James H ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

behavioral change; commuting; experience design framework; ridesharing; social networks; user centered design methods

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL CHANGES; COMMUTING; EXPERIENCE DESIGN; RIDE-SHARING; SOCIAL NETWORKS; USER CENTERED DESIGNS;

DYNAMICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84866502762     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2347504.2347571     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A. 2000. The Automatic Activation of Goal-directed Behavior: The case of Travel Habit, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 75-82, Academic Press.
2. Ashforth et al. 2000. All in a Day's Work: Boundaries and Micro Role Transitions, Academy of Management Review, V.25, No: 3, p 472-491
3. Bamberg, S. 2000. The Promotion of New Behavior by Forming an Implementation Intention: Results of a Field Experiment in the Domain of Travel Mode choice, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2000, 30, 9 p.1903-1922
4. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., Blobaum, A. 2007. Social context, personal norms, and the use of public transportation: Two field studies, Journal of Environmental Psychology 27 (2007). 190-203
5. Bamberg, S., Schmidt, P. 2003. Incentives, Morality, Or Habit? Predicting Students' Car Use for University Routes With the Models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis Environment and Behavior 2003; 35; 264.
6. Brewer, J., Mainwaring, S., and Dourish, P. 2008. Aesthetic journeys. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing interactive Systems DIS '08. ACM, New York, NY, 333-341.
7. Carr, K. 2008. Qualitative Research to Assess Interest in Public Transportation for Work Commute, Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 1
8. Clark, S. 2000. Work/Family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance, Human Relations, 53;747
9. Collins et al.2005. Psychological and Situational Influences on Commuter-Transport-Mode-Choice, Environment and Behavior 37; 64
10. Collins R. 2004.Interaction Ritual Chains, Princeton University Press
11. Davidoff et al. 2007.Rapidly Exploring Application Design through Speed Dating. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer: 429-446.
12. DeCicco, J., Fung, F. 2006.Global Warming On the Road, The Climate Impact of America's Automobiles, http://www.edf.org/documents/5301- Globalwarmingontheroad.pdf
13. Eriksson, L. 2008. Pro-environmental travel behavior: The importance of attitudinal factors, habits, and transport policy measures. Department of Psychology, Umeå Uni., Sweden
14. Fogg, B.J. 2003.Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do, Morgan Kaufmann
15. Froehlich et al. 2009. UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In Proceedings of the CHI'09 ACM, New York, NY, 1043-1052
16. Fujii et al. 2001. Changes in Drivers' Perceptions and Use of Public Transport during a Freeway Closure: Effects of Temporary Structural Change on Cooperation in a Real-Life Social Dilemma, Environment and Behavior, 33; 796,
17. Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, Garden City, New York.
18. Goloco. (n.d.). Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://goloco.org/ greetings/guest
19. Goosenetworks(n.d.) Retrieved Jan 18, 2010, from www.goosenetworks.com/ features/tripplanner.html
20. Hall, R., W., Qureshe, A. 1997. Dynamic Ride-sharing: Theory and Practice, Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol. 123. No.4
21. Joireman, J., A., Van Lange, P., A., M., Kuhlman, D., M., Van Vugt, M., Shelley, G., P. 1997. An Interdependence Analysis of commuting decisions, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 27, 441-463
22. Klockner, C., A., Matthies, E. 2004. How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel-mode choice, Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 319-327
23. Kluger, A.N. 1998. Commute variability and strain, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.19, 147-165
24. Koslowsky, M.1997. Commuting Stress: Problems of Definition and Variable Identification, Applied Psychology: An international Review, 46(2). 153-173.
25. Laurier, E. 2002.The Region as a Socio-technical Accomplishment of Mobile Workers. In Brown,B., Green, N. and Harper, R., editors. Wireless World. Springer: London; p. 46-61
26. Lockton et al. 2009. Influencing interaction: development of the design with intent method. In Proceedings of the Persuasive '09, vol. 350. ACM, New York, NY, 1-8.
27. Mankoff et al. 2007. Environmental sustainability and interaction. In CHI '07 ACM, New York, 2121-212
28. Mateas M. Sengers, P. 2003. Narrative Intelligence, John Benjamis Publishing Company, p 1-22
29. Mccarthy, J. Wright, P. 2004. Technology as experience. The MIT Press, page 16
30. Morse, J., Palay, J., Luon, Y., and Nainwal, S. 2007. CarLoop: leveraging common ground to develop long-term carpools. In CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, 2073-2078
31. Nippert-Eng, C.E. 1996. Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries Through Everyday Life. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
32. Nordlund, A., M., Garvill, J. 2003. Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal willingness to reduce personal car use, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339-347
33. Nuride(n.d.). Retrieved January 18, 2010, from http://www.nuride.com/ nuride/public/p-about-us.jsp
34. Ory et al. 2004.When is Commuting Desirable to the Individual? Growth and Change, Vol: 35 No:3, pp. 334-359
35. Ozenc, F.K. 2009.Transitions Research for Experience Design: Designing Interactive Products and services for Role and Environmental Transitions, IASDR 2009, Seoul, Korea
36. Perry et al. 2001.Dealing with Mobility: Understanding Access Anytime, Anywhere. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI). 2001; 8(4): 323-347.
37. Reschovsky, C. 2000. Journey to Work, U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration
38. Suchman, Lucy A. 1987. Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
39. Tolmie et al. 2002. Unremarkable computing. In Proceedings of the CHI '02. ACM, New York, NY, 399-406.
40. Urry, J. 2000. Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century, London: Routledge
41. Van Lange et al. 1998. A Social Dilemma Analysis of Commuting Preferences: The Roles of Social Value Orientation and Trust, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 9, pp. 796-820.
42. Verplanken et al. 2008. Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypotheses, Journal of Environmental Psychology 28, 121-127
43. Wang,F.,Tang,S., Sui,Y. Wang, X. 2008.Toward Intelligent Transportation Systems for the 2008 Olympics, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 8-11
44. Wash et al. 2005. Design decisions in the RideNow project. In Proceedings of the GROUP '05. ACM, New York, NY, 132-135
45. Wellman et al. 2003.The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 8:3
46. Zimmerman, J. 2009. Designing for the self: making products that help people become the person they desire to be. In Proceedings of the CHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 395-404.
47. Zimride(n.d.) Retrieved Jan 18, 2010, from http://www.zimride.com/about