Optimization of process parameters for cellulase production from Bacillus sp. JS14 in solid substrate fermentation using response surface methodology

Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 505-512

  Singh, Jagdish ^a   Kaur, Pawandeep ^a  

^a Mata Gujri College   (India)

Author keywords

Cellulase; Optimization; Response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

BACILLUS (BACTERIUM); BACILLUS SP.; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84866502643     PISSN: 15168913     EISSN: 16784324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-89132012000400004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adsul MG, Bastawde KB, Varma AJ, Gokhale DV. Strain improvement of Penicillium janthinellum NCIM 1171 for increased cellulaseproduction. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 98: 1467-1473.
2. Ariffin HN, Abdullah MS, Umikalsom Y, Shirai, Hassan MA. Production of bacterial endoglucanase from pretreated oil palm empty fruit bunch by Bacillus pumilus EB3. J Biosci Bioeng. 2008; 106: 231-236.
3. Beguin P, Aubert JP. The biological degration of cellulose. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994; 13: 25-28.
4. Bhat MK. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 2000; 18: 355-383.
5. Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE. Bergey's of determinative bacteriology. America: United States of America. 1974; 529-563.
6. Chahal PS, Chahal DS, Andre G. Cellulase production profile of Trichoderma reesei on different cellulosic substrates at various pH levels. J Ferment Bioeng. 1992; 74: 126-128.
7. Chen F, Cai TY, Zhao GH, Liao XJ, Guo LY, Hu XS. Optimizing conditions for the purification of crude octacosanol extract from rice bran wax by molecular distillation analyzed using response surface methodology. J Food Eng. 2005; 70: 47-53.
8. Dey G, Mitra A. Banerjee R, Maiti BR. Enhanced production of amylase by optimization of nutritional constituents using response surface methodology. Biochem. Eng. J. 2001; 7: 227-231.
9. Duff SJ, Murray WD. Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol. 1996; 55: 1-33.
10. Kashyap P, Sabu A, Pandey A, Szakacs G. Extracellular Lglutaminase production by Zygosaccharomyces rouxii under solidstate fermentation. Process Biochem. 2002; 38: 307-312.
11. Kaur J, Chadha BS, Kumar BA, Saini HS. Purification and characterization of two endoglucanases from Melanocarpus sp. MTCC 3922. Biores Technol. 2007; 98: 74-81.
12. Kristo E, Biliaderis CG, Tzanetakis N. Modelling of the acidification process and rheological properties of milk fermented with a yogurt starter culture using response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2003; 83: 437-446.
13. Krootdilaganandh J. Isolation and selection of thermotolerant bacteria capable of producing cellulase. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University Press. 2000; 88: 20-21.
14. Lee SL, Chen WC. Optimization of medium composition for the production of glucosyltransferase by Aspergillus niger with response surface methodology. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1997; 21: 436-440.
15. Mandels M. Applications of cellulases. Biochem Soc Trans. 1985; 13: 414-416.
16. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid regent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959; 31: 426-428.
17. Nieves RA, Ehrman CL, Adney WS, Elander RT, Himmel ME. Technical communication: survey and analysis of commercial cellulase preparations suitable for biomass conversion to ethanol. W J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998; 14: 301-304.
18. Ramachandran S, Patel AK, Nampoothiri KM, Francis F, Nagy V, Szakacs G, Pandey A. Coconut oil cake-a potential raw material for the production of amylase. Biores Technol. 2004; 93: 169-174.
19. Reczey K, Szengyel Z, Eklund R, Zacchi G. Cellulase production by T. reesei. Biores Technol. 1996; 57: 25-30.
20. Seiboth B, Lukas H, Salovuori N, Karin L, Robson DG, Vehmaanpera J, Penttila ME, Kubicek CP. Role of the bga1-encoded extracellular galactosidase of Hypocrea jecorina in cellulase induction by lactose. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71: 851-857.
21. Silva CJ, Roberto C. Optimization of xylitol production by Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037 using response surface methodology. Process Biochem. 2001; 36: 1119-1124.
22. Teruel MLA, Gontier E, Bienaime C, Saucedo JE, Barbotin JN. Response surface analysis of chlortetracycline and tetracycline production with Kcarrageenan mmobilized Streptomyces aureofaciens. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1997; 21: 314-320.
23. Wejse PL, Ingvorsen K, Mortensen KK. Xylanase production by a novel halophilic bacterium increased 20-fold by response surface methodology. Enz Microb Technol. 2003; 32: 721-727.