Prospects for a heterodox economics of the environment and sustainability

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1019-1032

  Douai, Ali ^a   Mearman, Andrew ^b   Negru, Ioana ^c  

^a GREDEG CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84866469961     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bes053     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adaman, F. and Özkaynak, B. 2002. The economics-environment relationship: some critical remarks on the neoclassical, institutional, and Marxist approaches, Studies in Political Economy, vol. 69, 109-35
2. Akbulut, B. and Soylu, C. I. 2012. An inquiry into power and participatory natural resource management, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1143-62
3. Aldred, J. 2012. Climate change uncertainty, irreversibility and the precautionary principle, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1051-72
4. Allenby, B. 2006. The ontologies of industrial ecology? Progress in Industrial Ecology-An International Journal, vol. 3, nos 1-2, 28-40
5. Altvater, E. 2007. A Marxist ecological economics, Monthly Review, vol. 58, no. 8, 55-64
6. Becker, J. and Raza, W. G. 2000. Theory of regulation and political ecology: an inevitable separation? Économies et Sociétés, Série Théorie de la Régulation, vol. 11, 55-70
7. Bergh, J. C. J. M. van den(ed.) 2002. Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
8. Berr, E. 2009. Keynes and sustainable development, International Journal of Political Economy, vol. 38, no. 3, 22-38
9. Bigo, V. and Negru, I. 2011. Theorising care: a possible defence of interdisciplinarity in economics, International Journal of Green Economics, vol. 5, no. 2, 109-25
10. Boisvert, V. and Vivien, F.-D. 2012. Towards a political economy approach to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1163-79
11. Burkett, P. 2004. Marx's reproduction schemes and the environment, Ecological Economics, vol. 49, no. 4, 457-67
12. Burkett, P. 2006. Marxism and Ecological Economics. Toward a Red and Green Political Economy, Boston, Brill
13. Burkett, P. and Foster, J. B. 2004. Ecological economics and classical Marxism: the 'Podolinsky business' reconsidered, Organization & Environment, vol. 17, no. 1, 32-60
14. Burkett, P. and Foster, J. B. 2006. Metabolism, energy, and entropy in Marx's critique of political economy: beyond the Podolinsky myth, Theory and Society, vol. 35, no. 1, 109-56
15. Burkett, P. and Foster, J. B. 2008. Classical Marxism and the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Marx/Engels, the Heat Death of the Universe Hypothesis and the origins of ecological economics, Organization & Environment, vol. 21, no. 1, 3-37
16. Cazals, C. 2012. Examining the conventions of voluntary environmental approaches (VEAs) in French agriculture, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1181-98
17. Chester, L. 2010. Determining the economic-environment relation: a regulationist approach, International Journal of Green Economics, vol. 4, no. 1, 17-42
18. Daily, G. C. 1997. Nature's Services, Covelo, CA, Island Press
19. Douai, A. 2009. Value theory in ecological economics: the contribution of a political economy of wealth, Environmental Values, vol. 18, no. 3, 257-84
20. Douai, A. 2010. Why would we need green economics when we have ecological economics? A proposal for pulling people together at the crossroad of environmental and social sustainability, International Journal of Green Economics, vol. 4, no. 1, 43-62
21. Douai, A. and Montalban, M. 2012. Institutions and the environment: the case for a political socio-economy of environmental conflicts, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1199-220.
22. Foster, J. (ed.) 1997. Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics and Environment, London, Routledge
23. Foster, J. B. 2008. Marx's Grundrisse and the ecological contradictions of capitalism, pp. 94-106 in Musto, M. (ed.), Karl Marx's Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy 150 Years Later, Frontiers in Political Economy, Abingdon, Routledge
24. Godard, O. 2006. La pensée économique face à l'environnement, pp. 241-77 in Leroux, A. and Livet P. (eds), Leçons de Philosophie économique-Tome II: Économie normative et philosophie morale, Paris, Economica
25. Godard, O. 2007. Is sustainable development an alternative principle of justification? pp. 17-41, in Thoyer S. and Martimort-Asso B. (eds), Participation for Sustainability in Trade, Aldershot, Ashgate
26. Gowdy, J. M. 1991. Bioeconomics and post Keynesian economics: a search for common ground, Ecological Economics, vol. 3, 77-87
27. Holt, R., Pressman, S. and Spash, C. L. (eds) 2009. Post-Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Environmental Issues, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
28. Kennet, M. and Heinemann, V. 2006. Green economics: setting the scene. Aims, context, and philosophical underpinning of the distinctive new solutions offered by green economics, International Journal of Green Economics, vol. 1, nos 1-2, 68-101
29. Kronenberg, T. 2010. Finding common ground between ecological economics and post-Keynesian economics, Ecological Economics, vol. 69, no. 7, 1488-94
30. Lawson, C. 2012. Aviation lock-in and emissions trading, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1221-43
31. Lawson, T. 2006. The nature of heterodox economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no. 4, 483-507
32. Lawson, T. 2007. An orientation for a green economics? International Journal of Green Economics, vol. 1, nos 3-4, 250-67
33. Lee, F. 2011. The making of heterodox microeconomics, MPRA Paper No. 30907, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30907/ (date last accessed 6 September 2012)
34. Martinez-Alier, J. 1988. Ecological economics and eco-socialism, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, vol. 1, no. 2, 109-22
35. Martinez-Alier, J. 2002. The Environmentalism of the Poor. A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
36. Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G. and O'Neill, J. 1998. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics, Ecological Economics, vol. 26, no. 3, 277-86
37. Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G. and O'Neill, J. 2001. Theories and methods in ecological economics: a tentative classification, pp. 34-56 in Cleveland, C., Stern, D. and Costanza, R. (eds), The Economics of Nature and the Nature of Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
38. Mearman, A. 2005. Why have post Keynesians had (relatively) little to say on economics of the environment? International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, vol. 1, no. 2, 131-54
39. Mearman, A. 2007. Post Keynesian economics and the environment: waking up and smelling the coffee burning? International Journal of Green Economics, vol. 1, nos 3-4, 374-80
40. Mearman, A. 2009. Recent developments in post-Keynesian methodology and their relevance for understanding environmental issues, pp. 27-46 in Holt, R., Pressman, S. and Spash, C. L. (eds), Post-Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Environmental Issues, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
41. Mearman, A. 2011. Who do heterodox economists think they are? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 70, no. 2, 179-209
42. Nas, S. and Ozveren, E. 2012. Economic development and environmental policy in Turkey: an institutionalist critique, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1245-66
43. Nelson, A. 2001. The poverty of money: Marxian insights for ecological economists, Ecological Economics, vol. 36, no. 3, 499-511
44. O'Connor, J. 1998. Natural Causes: Essays in Ecological Marxism, New York, Guilford Press
45. O'Neill, J. 2004. Ecological economics and the politics of knowledge: the debate between Hayek and Neurath, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 28, no. 3, 431-47
46. O'Neill, J. 2012. Austrian economics and the limits of markets, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1073-90
47. Özkaynak, B., Adaman, F. and Devine, P. 2012. The identity of ecological economics: retrospects and prospects, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1123-42
48. Özkaynak, B., Devine, P. and Rigby, D. 2002. Whither ecological economics? International Journal of Environment and Pollution, vol. 18, no. 4, 317-35
49. Paavola, J. 2007. Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization, Ecological Economics, vol. 63, no. 1, 93-103
50. Røpke, I. 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, Ecological Economics, vol. 55, no. 2, 262-90
51. Scott Cato, M. 2012. Green economics: putting the planet and politics back into economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1033-49
52. Söderbaum, P. 2000. Ecological Economics: A Political Economics Approach to Environment and Development, London, Earthscan
53. Söderbaum, P. 2007. Issues of paradigm, ideology and democracy in sustainability assessment, Ecological Economics, vol. 60, no. 3, 613-26
54. Spash, C. L. 1999. The development of environmental thinking in economics, Environmental Values, vol. 8, no. 4, 413-35
55. Spash, C. L. 2006. The State of Ecological Economics: A decade of European Experience, Newsletter of the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE), December.
56. Spash, C. L. 2011. Social ecological economics: understanding the past to see the future, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 70, no. 2, 340-75
57. Spash, C. L. 2012. New foundations for ecological economics, Ecological Economics, vol. 77, 36-47
58. Spash, C. L. and Ryan, A. 2012. Economic schools of thought on the environment: investigating unity and division, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 36, no. 5, 1091-21
59. Spash, C. L. and Schandl, H. 2009. Challenges for post Keynesian growth theory: utopia meets environmental and social reality, pp. 47-76 in Holt, R., Pressman, S. and Spash, C. L. (eds), Post-Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Environmental Issues, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
60. Spash, C. L. and Villena, M. G. 1998. 'Exploring the Approach of Institutional Economics to the Environment', Environment Series no. 11, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge
61. Tan uro, T. 2010. Marxism, energy, and ecology: the moment of truth, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, vol. 21, no. 4, 89-101
62. Vatn, A. 2005. Institutions and the Environment, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
63. Vatn, A. 2009A. An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal, Ecological Economics, vol. 68, nos 8-9, 2207-15
64. Vatn, A. 2009B. Combining post Keynesian, ecological and institutional economics perspectives, pp. 114-38 in Holt, R., Pressman, S. and Spash, C. L. (eds), Post-Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Environmental Issues, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
65. Zuindeau, B. 2007. Régulation School and the environment: theoretical proposals and avenues of research, Ecological Economics, vol. 62, no. 2, 281-90