How distance mitigates perceived threat at 30-90 M

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 114, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 709-716

  Stamps III, Arthur E ^a  

^a Institute of Environmental Quality   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BODY POSTURE; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; MALE; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PERCEPTION; SEX;

CUES; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMANS; MALE; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; POSTURE; SEX; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84866463351     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: 1558688X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/24.20.27.PMS.114.3.709-716     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Psychological Association. (2009) Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anderson, P. A. (2008) Nonverbal communication: forms and functions. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
3. Cochrane Collaboration. (2005) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.5. Retrieved August 21, 2006, from http://www.cochrane.org.
4. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1993) Applied regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Feimer, N. R. (1984) Environmental perception: the effects of media, evaluative context, and observer sample. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 61-80.
7. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
8. Hedigger, H. (1950) Wild animals in captivity: an outline of the biology of zoological gardens.(G. Sircom, Trans., 1964 ed.) New York: Dover.
9. Kawachi, Y., Kawabata, H., Kitamura, M. S., Shibata, M., Imaizumi, O., & Gyoba, J. (2011) Topographic distribution of brain activities corresponding to psychological structures underlying affective meanings: an fMRI study. Japanese Psychological Research, 43(4), 361-371.
10. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: Univer. of Illinois Press.
11. Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2010) Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327, 576-579.
12. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000) Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press.
13. Stamps, A. E. (1992) Bootstrap investigation of respondent sample size for environmental preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 220-222.
14. Stamps, A. E. (1999) Demographic effects in environmental preferences: a meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 14(2), 155-175.
15. Stamps, A. E. (2000) Psychology and the aesthetics of the built environment. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
16. Stamps, A. E. (2010) Use of static and dynamic media to simulate environments: a meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 111, 355-364.
17. Stamps, A. E. (2011a) Distance mitigates perceived threat. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 113, 1-13.
18. Stamps, A. E. (2011b) Validation of computer simulations for effects of eye gaze, sex, facial expression, and posture on perceived threat. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 112, 821-828.
19. Stamps, A. E., & Nasar, J. L. (1997) Design review and public preferences: effects of geographical location, public consensus, sensation seeking, and architectural styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 11-32.