Topographic distribution of brain activities corresponding to psychological structures underlying affective meanings: An fMRI study

Japanese Psychological Research

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 361-371

  Kawachi, Yousuke ^a   Kawabata, Hideaki ^b   Kitamura, Miho S ^c   Shibata, Michiaki ^a   Imaizumi, Osamu ^a   Gyoba, Jiro ^d  

^a TOHOKU FUKUSHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Affective meanings; FMRI; Semantic differential technique

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055070151     PISSN: 00215368     EISSN: 14685884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00485.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Dalgleish, T. (2004). The emotional brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 583-589.
2. Degonda, N., Mondadori, C. R. A., Bosshardt, S., Schmidt, C. F., Boesiger, P., Nitsch, R. M., Hock, C., & Henke, K. (2005). Implicit associative learning engages the hippocampus and interacts with explicit associative learning. Neuron, 46, 505-520.
3. Dogil, G., Ackermann, H., Grodd, W., Haider, H., Kamp, H., Mayer, J., Riecker, A., & Wildgruber, D. (2002). The speaking brain: A tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody and syntax. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 59-90.
4. Edwards, B. (1986). Drawing on the artist within: An inspirational and practical guide to increasing your creative powers. New York: Simon & Schuster.
5. Gaab, N., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Glover, G. H. (2007a). Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. I. An fMRI study comparing three experimental designs with varying degrees of scanner noise. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 703-720.
6. Gaab, N., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Glover, G. H. (2007b). Assessing the influence of scanner background noise on auditory processing. II. An fMRI study comparing auditory processing in the absence and presence of recorded scanner noise using a sparse design. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 721-732.
7. Hegner, Y. L., Saur, R., Veit, R., Butts, R., Leiberg, S., Grodd, W., & Braun, C. (2007). BOLD adaptation in vibrotactile stimulation: Neuronal networks involved in frequency discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 264-271.
8. Hitch, G. J., Brandimonte, M. A., & Walker, P. (1995). Two types of representation in visual memory: Evidence from the effects of stimulus contrast. Memory and Cognition, 23, 147-154.
9. Hoshi, Y. (2005). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Potential and limitations in neuroimaging studies. International Review of Neurobiology, 66, 237-266.
10. Jacobsen, T., Schubotz, R. I., Höfel, L., & Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage, 29, 276-285.
11. Jeannerod, M., & Decety, J. (1995). Mental motor imagery: A window into the representational stages of action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 727-732.
12. Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1699-1705.
13. Kosslyn, S. M., Ball, T. M., & Reise, B. J. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 47-60.
14. Kringelbach, M. L. (2005). The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 691-702.
15. Kristjánsson, A., Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Macaluso, E., & Driver, D. (2007). Neural basis for priming of pop-out during visual search revealed with fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1612-1624.
16. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J. P., Mahnkopf, C., Holzknecht, C., Siebner, H., Ulmer, S., & Jansen, O. (2003). Effector-independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: A combined fMRI and TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 3375-3387.
17. LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 54-64.
18. Nadal, M., Munar, E., Capó, M. A., Rosselló, J., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2008). Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial Vision, 21, 379-396.
19. O'Doherty, J., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., Hornak, J., & Andrews, C. (2001). Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 95-102.
20. O'Doherty, J., Winston, J., Critchley, H., Perrett, D., Burt, D. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Beauty in a smile: The role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 41, 147-155.
21. Olivetti Belardinelli, M. O., Palmiero, M., Sestieri, C., Nardo, D., Di Matteo, R., Londei, A., D'Ausilio, A., Ferretti, A., Del Gratta, C., & Romani, G. L. (2009). An fMRI investigation on image generation in different sensory modalities: The influence of vividness. Acta Psychologica, 132, 190-200.
22. Osgood, C. E. (1960). The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. Behavioral Science, 5, 146-169.
23. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
24. Oyama, T., Yamada, H., & Iwasawa, H. (1998). Synesthetic tendencies as the basis of the sensory symbolism: A review of a series of experiments by means of semantic differential. Psychologia, 41, 203-215.
25. Paradis, A. L., Van de Moortele, P. F., Le Bihan, D., & Poline, J. B. (2001). Slice acquisition order and blood oxygenation level dependent frequency content: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 13, 91-100.
26. Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Esslen, M., Kochi, K., & Lehmann, D. (2002). Functional imaging with low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA): Review, new comparisons, and new validation. Japanese Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 30, 81-94.
27. Romo, R., Hernandez, A., Zainos, A., Brody, C., & Salinas, E. (2002). Exploring the cortical evidence of a sensory-discrimination process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 357, 1039-1051.
28. Schaefer, M., & Rotte, M. (2010). Combining a semantic differential with fMRI to investigate brands as cultural symbols. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 274-281.
29. Shergill, S. S., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2001). A functional study of auditory verbal imagery. Psychological Medicine, 31, 241-253.
30. Skrandies, W. (1998). Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaning: A brain mapping study. Cognitive Brain Research, 6, 173-183.
31. Skrandies, W., & Chiu, M. J. (2003). Dimensions of affective semantic meaning: Behavioral and evoked potential correlates in Chinese subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 341, 45-48.
32. Skrandies, W., Chiu, M. J., & Lin, Y. (2004). The processing of semantic meaning in Chinese words and evoked brain topography. Brain Topography, 16, 255-259.
33. Stevens, J. A. (2005). Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action. Cognition, 95, 329-350.
34. Suzuki, M., & Gyoba, J. (2003). Analyzing the factor structure and the sensory-relevance of impressions produced by words and drawings. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 73, 518-523 (In Japanese with English abstract.)
35. Suzuki, M., Gyoba, J., Kawabata, H., Yamaguchi, H., & Komatsu, H. (2006). Analyses of the sensory-relevance of adjective pairs by the modality differential method. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 77, 464-470 (In Japanese with English abstract.)
36. Suzuki, M., Gyoba, J., & Sakuta, Y. (2003). Multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy analysis of brain activities during semantic differential rating of drawings. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 62, 86-98.
37. Suzuki, M., Gyoba, J., & Sakuta, Y. (2005). Multichannel NIRS analysis of brain activity during semantic differential rating of drawing stimuli containing different affective polarities. Neuroscience Letters, 375, 53-58.
38. Takahashi, S. (1995). Aesthetic properties of pictorial perception. Psychological Review, 102, 671-683.
39. Toni, I., Schluter, N. D., Josephs, O., Friston, K., & Passingham, R. E. (1999). Signal-, set-, and movement-related activity in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 35-49.
40. Yoo, S.-S., Freeman, D. K., McCarthy, J. J. III, & Jolesz, F. A. (2003). Neural substrates of tactile imagery: A functional MRI study. NeuroReport, 14, 581-585.
41. Zatorre, R. J., Belin, P., & Penhune, V. B. (2002). Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 37-46.
42. Zatorre, R. J., Halpern, A. R., Perry, D. W., Meyer, E., & Evans, A. C. (1996). Hearing in the mind's ear: A PET investigation of musical imagery and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 29-46.