Observation of one-way Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering

Nature Photonics

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 596-599

  Händchen, Vitus ^a   Eberle, Tobias ^a   Steinlechner, Sebastian ^a   Samblowski, Aiko ^a   Franz, Torsten ^a,b   Werner, Reinhard F ^a,b   Schnabel, Roman ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b Leibniz University Hannover   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUANTUM OPTICS;

BELL'S INEQUALITY; BIPARTITE STATE; EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN; EXPERIMENTAL REALIZATIONS; QUANTUM INFORMATION; QUANTUM METROLOGY; QUANTUM PHYSICS; STEERING EFFECTS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 84866437579     PISSN: 17494885     EISSN: 17494893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.202     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935).
2. Schrödinger, E. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555-563 (1935).
3. Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661-663 (1991).
4. Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weihs, G., Weinfurter, H. & Zeilinger, A. Quantum cryptography with entangled photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4729-4732 (2000).
5. Braunstein, S. L. & van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513-577 (2005).
6. Afek, I., Ambar, O. & Silberberg, Y. High-NOON states by mixing quantum and classical light. Science 328, 879-881 (2010).
7. Schnabel, R., Mavalvala, N., McClelland, D. E. & Lam, P. K. Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy. Nature Commun. 121 (2010).
8. The LIGO Scientific Collaboration. A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit. Nature Phys. 7, 962-965 (2011).
9. Wiseman, H. M., Jones, S. J. & Doherty, A. C. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007).
10. Cavalcanti, E. G., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M. & Reid, M. D. Experimental criteria for steering and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. A 80, 032112 (2009).
11. Ou, Z. Y., Pereira, S. F., Kimble, H. J. & Peng, K. C. Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663-3666 (1992).
12. Reid, M. D. et al. Colloquium: the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: from concepts to applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1727-1751 (2009).
13. Saunders, D. J., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M. & Pryde, G. J. Experimental EPR-steering using Bell-local states. Nature Phys. 6, 845-849 (2010).
14. Wittmann, B. et al. Loophole-free Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment via quantum steering. New J. Phys. 14, 053030 (2012).
15. Smith, D. H. et al. Conclusive quantum steering with superconducting transition-edge sensors. Nature Commun. 3, 625 (2012).
16. Werner, R. F. Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277-4281 (1989).
17. Wagner, K. et al. Entangling the spatial properties of laser beams. Science 321, 541-543 (2008).
18. Midgley, S. L. W., Ferris, A. J. & Olsen, M. K. Asymmetric Gaussian steering: when Alice and Bob disagree. Phys. Rev. A 81, 022101 (2010).
19. Reid, M. D. Demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification. Phys. Rev. A 40, 913-923 (1989).
20. Eberle, T. et al. Gaussian entanglement for quantum key distribution from a single-mode squeezing source. Preprint at http://arXiv.org/abs.1110.3977 (2011).
21. DiGuglielmo, J. et al. Experimental unconditional preparation and detection of a continuous bound entangled state of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 240503 (2011).
22. Eberle, T. et al. Strong Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen entanglement from a single squeezed light source. Phys. Rev. A 83, 052329 (2011).