Experimental EPR-steering using Bell-local states

Nature Physics

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 845-849

  Saunders, D J ^a,b   Jones, S J ^a,b   Wiseman, H M ^a,b   Pryde, G J ^a,b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH COUNCIL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BELLS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

BELL INEQUALITIES; BIPARTITE STATE; EINSTEIN-PODOLSKY-ROSEN; ENTANGLED STATE; LOCAL STATE; NONLOCALITIES; QUANTUM INFORMATION;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 78149279968     PISSN: 17452473     EISSN: 17452481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nphys1766     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Schrödinger, E. Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 555-563 (1935).
2. Wiseman, H. M., Jones, S. J. & Doherty, A. C. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402(2007).
3. Ou, Z. Y., Pereira, S. F., Kimble, H. J. & Peng, K. C. Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox for continuous variables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3663-3666 (1992).
4. Bowen, W. P., Schnabel, R., Lam, P. K. & Ralph, T. C. Experimental investigation of criteria for continuous variable entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 043601(2003).
5. Hald, J., Sørensen, J. L., Schori, C. & Polzik, E. S. Spin squeezed atoms: A macroscopic entangled ensemble created by light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1319-1322 (1999).
6. Howell, J. C., Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J. & Boyd, R. W. Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using momentum-and position-entangled photons from spontaneous parametric down conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 210403(2004).
7. Reid, M. D. Demonstration of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using nondegenerate parametric amplification. Phys. Rev. A 40, 913-923 (1989).
8. Altepeter, J. B. et al. Experimental methods for detecting entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 033601(2005).
9. Acìn, A., Gisin, N. & Toner, B. Grothendieck's constant and local models for noisy entangled quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 73, 062105(2006).
10. Brunner, N. & Gisin, N. Partial list of bipartite Bell inequalities with four binary settings. Phys. Lett. A 372, 3162-3167 (2008).
11. Vértesi, T. More efficient Bell inequalities for Werner states. Phys. Rev. A 78, 032112(2008).
12. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. & Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935).
13. Reid, M. D. et al. Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox: From concepts to applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1727-1751 (2009).
14. Cavalcanti, E. G., Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M. & Reid, M. D. Experimental criteria for steering and the EPR paradox. Phys. Rev. A. 80, 032112(2009).
15. Jones, S. J., Wiseman, H. M. & Doherty, A. C. Entanglement, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations, Bell nonlocality, and steering. Phys. Rev. A 76, 052116(2007).
16. White, A. G. et al. Measuring two-qubit gates. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 172-183 (2007).
17. Barrett, J. Nonsequential positive-operator-valued measurements on entangled mixed states do not always violate a Bell inequality. Phys. Rev. A 65, 042302(2002).
18. Werner, R. F. Quantum states with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations admitting a hidden-variable model. Phys. Rev. A 40, 4277-4281 (1989).
19. Bell, J. S. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics (Long Island City, N. Y.) 1, 195-200 (1964).
20. Clauser, J. F., Horne, M. A., Shimony, A. & Holt, R. A. Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880-884 (1969).
21. Kwiat, P. G., Waks, E., White, A. G., Appelbaum, I. & Eberhard, P. H. Ultrabright source of polarization-entangled photons. Phys. Rev. A 60, R773-R776 (1999).
22. O'Brien, J. L. et al. Demonstration of an all-optical quantum controlled-NOT gate. Nature 426, 264-267 (2003).
23. Langford, N. K. et al. Demonstration of a simple entangling optical gate and its use in Bell-state analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210504(2005).
24. Kiesel, N. et al. Linear optics controlled-phase gate made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210505(2005).
25. Okamoto, R., Hofmann, H. F., Takeuchi, S. & Sasaki, K. Demonstration of an optical quantum controlled-not gate without path interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210506(2005).
26. Puentes, G., Voigt, D., Aiello, A. & Woerdman, J. P. Tunable spatial decoherers for polarization-entangled photons. Opt. Lett. 31, 2057-2059 (2006).
27. James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J. & White, A. G. Measurement of qubits. Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312(2001).
28. Spekkens, R. W. et al. Preparation contextuality powers parity-oblivious multiplexing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 010401(2009).