Do aftershock probabilities decay with time?

Seismological Research Letters

Volumn 83, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 630-632

  Michael, Andrew J ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866428000     PISSN: 08950695     EISSN: 19382057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0220120061     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Felzer, K. R., R. E. Abercrombie, and G. Ekstrom (2003). Secondary aftershocks and their importance for aftershock prediction, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1433-1448.
2. Gardner, J. K., and L. Knopoff (1974). Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64, 1363-1367.
3. Gerstenberger, M., S. Wiemer, L. Jones, and P. Reasenberg (2005). Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California, Nature 435, 328-331.
4. Haas, J. E., R. W. Kates, and M. J. Bowden (Editors) (1977). Reconstruction Following Disaster, MIT Press, Cambridge, 331 pp.
5. Jordan, T. H., and L. M. Jones (2010). Operational earthquake forecasting: some thoughts on why and how, Seismol. Res. Lett. 81, no. 4, 571-574, doi 10.1785/gssrl.81.4.571.
6. Olshansky, R. B., L. A. Johnson, and K. C. Topping (2011). Opportunity in Chaos: Rebuilding after the 1994 Northridge and 1995 Kobe earthquakes, Dept. of Urban and Regional Planning, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 373 pp.
7. Reasenberg, P. A., and L. M. Jones (1989). Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California, Science 243, no. 4895, 1173-1176.
8. Utsu, T. (1969). Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (I): some parameters which characterize an aftershock sequence and their interrelations, J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Ser. VII (Geophysics) 3, 129-195.