How do stream organisms respond to, and influence, the concentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles? A mesocosm study with algae and herbivores

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2414-2422

  Kulacki, Konrad J ^a,b   Cardinale, Bradley J ^b   Keller, Arturo A ^a   Bier, Raven ^a,c   Dickson, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Metal oxide; Nanoparticle; Physa acuta; Stream; TiO2

Indexed keywords

ALGAL SPECIES; BIOFILM COMPOSITION; GROWTH TRAJECTORIES; HERBIVORY; INITIAL CONCENTRATION; MESOCOSMS; METAL OXIDES; NATURAL ECOSYSTEM; PHYSA ACUTA; POTENTIAL TRANSFER; SPECIES COMPOSITION; STREAM; TIO; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLES; TOTAL BIOMASS; TROPHIC LEVEL;

ALGAE; ANIMALS; EXPERIMENTS; METALLIC COMPOUNDS; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; OXIDES; TISSUE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

BIOFILMS;

NANOPARTICLE; SURFACE WATER; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ALGA; AQUATIC ORGANISM; BIOFILM; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); HERBIVORE; MESOCOSM; MONOCULTURE; OXIDE; PALATABILITY; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; STREAM; SURFACE WATER;

ALGA; ARTICLE; BIOFILM; BIOMASS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; EXPOSURE; HERBIVORE; HERBIVORY; MESOCOSM; NONHUMAN; PHYSA ACUTA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SNAIL; SPECIES COMPOSITION;

ANIMALS; BIOFILMS; BIOMASS; CHLOROPHYTA; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; HERBIVORY; METAL NANOPARTICLES; RIVERS; SNAILS; TITANIUM; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

ALGAE; GASTROPODA; PHYSA ACUTA;

EID: 84866415644     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.1962     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Rejeski D. 2009. Project on emerging nanotechnologies. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Consumer Product Safety Commission, Bethesda, MD.
2. Farre M, Gajda-Schrantz K, Kantiani L, Barcelo D. 2009. Ecotoxicity and analysis of nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:81-95.
3. Handy RD, Shaw BJ. 2007. Toxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: Implications for public health, risk assessment, and the public perception of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9:125-144.
4. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622-627.
5. Scown TM, van Aerle R, Tyler CR. 2010. Do engineered nanoparticles pose a significant threat to the aquatic environment? Crit Rev Toxicol 40:653-670.
6. Colvin VL. 2003. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 21:1166-1170.
7. Guzman KAD, Taylor MR, Banfield JF. 2006. Environmental risks of nanotechnology: National Nanotechnology Initiative Funding, 2000-2004. Environ Sci Technol 40:1401-1407.
8. Warheit DB. 2010. Debunking some misconceptions about nanotoxicology. Nano Lett 10:4777-4782.
9. Handy RD, Owen R, Valsami-Jones E. 2008. The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: Current status, knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology 17:315-325.
10. Mueller NC, Nowack B. 2008. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 42:4447-4453.
11. Borm P, Robbins D, Haubold S, Kuhlbusch T, Fissan H, Donaldson K, Schins R, Stone V, Kreyling W, Lademann J, Krutmann J, Warheit D, Oberdorster E. 2006. The potential risks of nanomaterials: A review carried out for ECETOC. Part Fibre Toxicol 3:1-35.
12. Ju-Nam Y, Lead JR. 2008. Manufactured nanoparticles: An overview of their chemistry, interactions, and potential environmental implications. Sci Total Environ 400:396-414.
13. 2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156:233-239.
14. 2, and ZnO water suspensions. Water Res 40:3527-3532.
15. 2: Transport behavior and effects on aquatic microbial communities under environmental conditions. Environ Sci Technol 43:8098-8104.
16. 2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Sci Total Environ 407:1461-1468.
17. 2 particles with an emphasis on the effect of particle size. Chem Eng J 170:538-546.
18. Keller AA, Wang HT, Zhou DX, Lenihan HS, Cherr G, Cardinale BJ, Miller R, Ji ZX. 2010. Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ Sci Technol 44:1962-1967.
19. Cardinale BJ. 2011. Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature 472:86-89.
20. Steinman AD, McIntire CD. 1986. Effects of current velocity and light energy on the structure of periphyton assemblages in laboratory streams. J Phycol 22:352-361.
21. Trainor FR, Cain JR, Shubert LE. 1976. Morphology and nutrition of colonial green-alga Scenedesmus-80 years later. Bot Rev 42:5-25.
22. Mulholland PJ, Steinman AD, Marzolf ER, Hart DR, Deangelis DL. 1994. Effect of periphyton biomass on hydraulic characteristics and nutrient cycling in streams. Oecologia 98:40-47.
23. Pennak RW. 1978. Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.
24. Lowe RL, Hunter RD. 1988. Effect of grazing by Physa integra on periphyton community structure. J North Am Benthol Soc 7:29-36.
25. Vogel S, LaBarbera M. 1978. Simple flow tanks for research and teaching. Bioscience 28:638-645.
26. Peterson CG, Stevenson RJ. 1992. Resistance and resilience of lotic algal communities-Importance of disturbance timing and current. Ecology 73:1445-1461.
27. Passy SI. 2001. Spatial paradigms of lotic diatom distribution: A landscape ecology perspective. J Phycol 37:370-378.
28. 2 photocatalysis: A historical overview and future prospects. Jpn J Appl Phys 44:8269-8285.
29. Watanabe MM. 2005. Freshwater culture media. In Andersen RA, ed, Algal Culturing Techniques. Academic, New York, NY, USA, pp 13-20.
30. Hillebrand H, Durselen CD, Kirschtel D, Pollingher U, Zohary T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae J Phycol 35:403-424.
31. 2. Review of in vivo data. Environ Pollut 159:677-684.
32. 2 on algae and daphnids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 13:225-232.
33. 2 particles as a component of nanoparticle risk management. Toxicol Lett 171:99-110.
34. 2) NPs on two microalgae species: Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:1180-1187.
35. Brunet L, Lyon D, Hotze EM, Alvarez PJJ, Wiesner MR. 2009. Comparative photoactivity and antibacterial properties of C60 fullerenes and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 43:4355-4360.
36. 2) nanoparticle-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative DNA damage in fish cells. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 640:113-122.
37. 2-coated hollow glass beads and their application to the control of algal growth in eutrophic water. Microchem J 80:227-232.
38. 2 on photochemical reaction of chloroplasts of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 105:269-279.
39. Lei Z, Su MY, Xiao W, Chao L, Qu CX, Liang C, Hao H, Liu XQ, Hong FS. 2007. Effects of nano-anatase on spectral characteristics and distribution of LHCII on the thylakoid membranes of spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res 120:273-283.
40. Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59-67.
41. Cardinale BJ, Matulich KL, Hooper DU, Byrnes JE, Duffy E, Gamfeldt L, Balvanera P, O'Connor MI, Gonzalez A. 2011. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am J Bot 98:572-592.
42. Ferry JL, Craig P, Hexel C, Sisco P, Frey R, Pennington PL, Fulton MH, Scott IG, Decho AW, Kashiwada S, Murphy CJ, Shaw TJ. 2009. Transfer of gold nanoparticles from the water column to the estuarine food web. Nat Nanotechnol 4:441-444.