On the quantumness of correlations in nuclear magnetic resonance

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 370, Issue 1976, 2012, Pages 4821-4836

  Soares Pinto, D O ^a   Auccaise, R ^b   Maziero, J ^c   Gavini Viana, A ^d   Serra, R M ^c   Celeri L C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ABC   (Brazil)

^d CENTRO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISAS FÍSICAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTS; INFORMATION THEORY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTUM OPTICS;

BENCH TESTS; NUCLEAR SPINS; QUANTUM CORRELATIONS; QUANTUM DISCORDS; QUANTUM DYNAMICS; QUANTUM INFORMATION SCIENCE; QUANTUM NATURE; SEPARABLE STATE; SEVERAL PROTOCOLS; ZEHNDER INTERFEROMETERS;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 84866402280     PISSN: 1364503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0364     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Oliveira, I. S., Bonagamba, T. J., Sarthour, R. S., Freitas, J. C. C. & deAzevedo, E. R. 2007 NMR quantum information processing. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
2. Jones, J. A. 2011 Quantum computing with NMR. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 59, 91-120. (doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2010.11.001)
3. Auccaise, R., Serra, R. M., Filgueiras, J. G., Sarthour, R. S., Oliveira, I. S. & Céleri, L. C. 2012 Experimental analysis of the quantum complementarity principle. Phys. Rev. A 85, 032121. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.85. 032121)
4. Braunstein, S. L., Caves, C. M., Jozsa, R., Linden, N., Popescu, S. & Schack, R. 1999 Separability of very noisy mixed states and implications for NMR quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1054-1057. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 83.1054)
5. Laflamme, R., Cory, D. G., Negrevergne, C. & Viola, L. 2002 NMR quantum information processing and entanglement. Quantum Inform. Comput. 2, 166-176.
6. Linden, N. & Popescu, S. 2001 Good dynamics versus bad kinematics: is entanglement needed for quantum computation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 047901. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.047901)
7. Gross, D., Flammia, S. T. & Eisert J. 2009 Most quantum states are too entangled to be useful as computational resources. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190501 (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190501)
8. Morimae, T. 2010 Strong entanglement causes low gate fidelity in inaccurate one-way quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 81, 060307. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.060307)
9. Tilma, T., Hamaji, S., Munro, W. J. & Nemoto, K. 2010 Entanglement is not a critical resource for quantum metrology. Phys. Rev. A 81, 022108. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022108)
10. Vedral, V. 2010 The elusive source of quantum speedup. Found. Phys. 40, 1141-1154. (doi:10.1007/s10701-010-9452-0)
11. Soares-Pinto, D. O., Céleri, L. C., Auccaise, R., Fanchini, F. F., deAzevedo, E. R., Maziero, J., Bonagamba, T. J. & Serra, R. M. 2010 Nonclassical correlation in NMR quadrupolar systems. Phys. Rev. A 81, 062118. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.062118)
12. Auccaise, R. et al. 2011 Environment-induced sudden transition in quantum discord dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 140403. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107. 140403)
13. Auccaise, R., Maziero, J., Céleri, L. C., Soares-Pinto, D. O., deAzevedo, E. R., Bonagamba, T. J., Sarthour, R. S., Oliveira, I. S. & Serra, R. M. 2011 Experimentally witnessing the quantumness of correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070501. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.070501)
14. Ollivier, H. & Zurek, W. H. 2002 Quantum discord: a measure of the quantumness of correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.88.017901)
15. Henderson, L. & Vedral, V. 2001 Classical, quantum and total correlations. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 6899. (doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315)
16. Céleri, L. C., Maziero, J. & Serra, R. M. 2011 Theoretical and experimental aspects of quantum discord and related measures. Int. J. Quantum Inform. 9, 1837. (doi:10.1142/S0219749911008374)
17. Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T. & Vedral, V. 2012 Quantum discord and other measures of quantum correlation. (http://arxiv.org/ abs/1112.6238).
18. Soares-Pinto, D. O., Moussa, M. H. Y., Maziero, J., deAzevedo, E. R., Bonagamba, T. J., Serra, R. M. & Céleri, L. C. 2011 Equivalence between Redfield- and master-equation approaches for a time-dependent quantum system and coherence control. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062336. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83. 062336)
19. Scully, M. O. & Zubairy, M. S. 1997 Quantum optics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Peng, X., Zhu, X., Fang, X., Feng, M., Liu, M. & Gao, K. 2003 An interferometric complementarity experiment in a bulk nuclear magnetic resonance ensemble. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36, 2555-2563. (doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/10/ 315)
21. Peng, X., Zhu, X., Suter, D., Du, J., Liu, M. & Gao, K. 2005 Quantification of complementarity in multiqubit systems. Phys. Rev. A 72, 052109. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052109)
22. Abragam, A. 1978 The principles of nuclear magnetism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23. Vandersypen, L. M. K. & Chuang, I. L. 2004 NMR techniques for quantum control and computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1037. (doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.76. 1037)
24. Bonk, F. A., Sarthour, R. S., deAzevedo, E. R., Bulnes, J. D., Mantovani, G. L., Freitas, J. C. C., Bonagamba, T. J., Guimarães, A. P. & Oliveira I. S. 2004 Quantum-state tomography for quadrupole nuclei and its application on a two-qubit system. Phys. Rev. A 69, 042322. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.69.042322)
25. Bonk, F. A., deAzevedo, E. R., Sarthour, R. S., Bulnes, J. D., Freitas, J. C. C., Guimarães, A. P., Oliveira, I. S. & Bonagamba, T. J. 2005 Quantum logical operations for spin-3/2 quadrupolar nuclei monitored by quantum state tomography. J. Magn. Reson. 175, 226-234. (doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.009)
26. Fahmy, A. F., Marx, R., Bermel, W. & Glaser, S. J. 2008 Thermal equilibrium as an initial state for quantum computation by NMR. Phys. Rev. A 78, 022317. (doi:10.1103/Phys RevA.78.022317)
27. Datta, A., Shaji, A. & Caves, C. M. 2008 Quantum discord and the power of one qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 050502. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 050502)
28. Lanyon, B. P., Barbieri, M., Almeida, M. P. & White, A. G. 2008 Experimental quantum computing without entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200501. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.200501)
29. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. 2000 Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Benenti, G., Casati, G. & Strini, G. 2007 Principles of quantum computation and information. Singapore: World Scientific.
31. Vedral, V. 2006 Introduction to quantum information science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32. Shannon, C. E. 1948 A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379.
33. Souza, A. M., Gavini-Viana, A., Oliveira, I. S., Sarthour, R. S., Auccaise, R., deAzevedo, E. R. & Bonagamba, T. J. 2010 Nuclear spin-32 electric quadrupole relaxation as a quantum computation process. Quantum Inform. Comput. 10, 653-668.
34. Maziero, J., Céleri, L. C., Serra, R. M. & Vedral, V. 2009 Classical and quantum correlations under decoherence. Phys. Rev. A 80, 044102. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.80.044102)
35. Rahimi, R. & Saitoh, A. 2010 Single-experiment-detectable nonclassical correlation witness. Phys. Rev. A 82, 022314. (doi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.82.022314)
36. Girolami, D. & Adesso, G. 2012 Observable measure of bipartite quantum correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 150403. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 108.150403)
37. Brodutch, A. & Modi, K. 2012 Criteria for measures of quantum correlations. Quantum Inform. Comput. 12, 721-742. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1108. 3649)
38. Zhang, C., Yu, S., Chen, Q. & Oh, C. H. 2011 Detecting the quantum discord of an unknown state by a single observable. Phys. Rev. A 84, 032122. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.032122)
39. Yu, S., Zhang, C., Chen, Q. & Oh, C. H. 2011 Witnessing the quantum discord of all the unknown states. (http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.4710).
40. Maziero, J. & Serra, R. M. 2012 Classicality witness for two-qubit states. Int. J. Quantum Inform. 10, 1250028. (doi:10.1142/S0219749912500281)
41. Passante, G., Moussa, O., Trottier, D. A. & Laflamme, R. 2011 Experimental detection of nonclassical correlations in mixed-state quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 84, 044302. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.044302)
42. Aguilar, G. H., Jiménez Farías, O., Maziero, J., Serra, R. M., Souto Ribeiro, P. H. & Walborn, S. P. 2012 Experimental estimate of a classicality witness via a single measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 063601. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.063601)
43. Stace, T. M. 2010 Quantum limits of thermometry. Phys. Rev. A 82, 011611(R). (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.82.011611)
44. Lloyd, S. 2008 Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quantum illumination. Science 321, 1463-1465. (doi:10.1126/science.1160627)
45. Englert, B.-G. 1996 Fringe visibility and which-way information: an inequality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2154-2157. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2154)
46. Machnes, S., Sander, U., Glaser, S. J., de Fouquières, P., Gruslys, A., Schirmer, S. & Schulte- Herbrüggen, T. 2011 Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022305. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.84.022305)
47. Álvarez, G. A. & Suter, D. 2010 NMR quantum simulation of localization effects induced by decoherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230403. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.230403)
48. Du, J., Xu, N., Peng, X., Wang, P., Wu, S. & Lu, D. 2010 NMR implementation of a molecular hydrogen quantum simulation with adiabatic state preparation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 030502. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.030502)
49. Lu, D., Xu, N., Xu, R., Chen, H., Gong, J., Peng, X. & Du, J. 2011 Simulation of chemical isomerization reaction dynamics on a NMR quantum simulator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 020501. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.020501)
50. Souza, A. M., Magalhães, A., Teles, J., deAzevedo, E. R., Bonagamba, T. J., Oliveira, I. S. & Sarthour, R. S. 2008 NMR analog of Bell's inequalities violation test. New J. Phys. 10, 033020. (doi:10.1088/1367-2630/10/3/033020)
51. Souza, A. M., Oliveira, I. S. & Sarthour, R. S. 2011 A scattering quantum circuit for measuring Bell's time inequality: a nuclear magnetic resonance demonstration using maximally mixed states. New J. Phys. 13, 053023. (doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053023)