A Peak-Clustering Method for MEG Group Analysis to Minimise Artefacts Due to Smoothness

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2012, Pages

  Gilbert, Jessica R ^a   Shapiro, Laura R ^a   Barnes, Gareth R ^b  

^a ASTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; LEFT INFERIOR OCCIPITAL GYRUS; LEFT INFERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; RIGHT ANTERIOR MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; RIGHT ANTERIOR SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; RIGHT SUPERIOR TEMPORAL GYRUS; SIMULATION; VOLUMETRY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84866391560     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045084     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gross J, Kujala J, Hamalainen M, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, et al. (2001) Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 694-699.
2. Barnes GR, Hillebrand A, (2003) Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images. Hum Brain Mapp 18: 1-12.
3. Barnes GR, Hillebrand A, Fawcett IP, Singh KD, (2004) Realistic spatial sampling for MEG beamformer images. Hum Brain Mapp 23: 120-127.
4. Worsley KJ, Andermann M, Koulis T, MacDonald D, Evans AC, (1999) Detecting changes in nonisotropic images. Human Brain Mapping 8: 98-101.
5. Hayasaka S, Phan KL, Liberzon I, Worsley KJ, Nichols TE, (2004) Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods. Neuroimage 22: 676-687.
6. Pantazis D, Nichols TE, Baillet S, Leahy RM, (2005) A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data. Neuroimage 25: 383-394.
7. Litvak V, Zeller D, Oostenveld R, Maris E, Cohen A, et al. (2007) LTP-like changes induced by paired associative stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex in humans: Source analysis and associated changes in behavior. Eur J Neurosci 25: 2862-2874.
8. Mattout J, Henson RN, Friston KJ, (2007) Canonical source reconstruction for MEG. Comput Intell Neurosci 2007: 67613.
9. Vrba J, Robinson SE, (2001) Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods 25: 249-271.
10. Van Veen BD, van Drongelen W, Yucktman M, Suzuki A, (1997) Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44: 867-880.
11. Sekihara K, Nagarajan SS, Poeppel D, Marantz A, (2004) Asymptotic SNR of scalar and vector minimum-variance beamformers for neuromagnetic source reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51: 1726-1734.
12. Woolrich M, Hunt L, Groves A, Barnes G, (2011) MEG beamforming using Bayesian PCA for adaptive data covariance matrix regularization. NeuroImage 57: 1466-1479.
13. Price CJ, Noppeney U, Phillips J, Devlin JT, (2003) How is the fusiform gyrus related to category-specificity? Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 561-574.
14. Gerlach C, Law I, Paulson OB, (2006) Shape configuration and category-specificity. Neuropsychologia 44: 1247-1260.
15. Simmons WK, Barsalou LW, (2003) The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 451-486.
16. Tyler LK, Stamatakis EA, Bright P, Acres K, Abdallah S, et al. (2004) Processing objects at different levels of specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 351-362.
17. Moss HE, Rodd JM, Stamatakis EA, Bright P, Tyler LK, (2005) Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. Cerebral Cortex 15: 616-627.