Individual differences in rhesus monkeys' demand for drugs of abuse

Addiction Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 887-896

  Koffarnus, Mikhail N ^a   Hall, Amy ^b   Winger, Gail ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral economics; drug addiction; drug self administration; individual differences; reinforcing effectiveness; rhesus monkeys

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; COCAINE; KETAMINE; METHOHEXITAL; REMIFENTANIL;

ALCOHOLISM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; INDIVIDUALIZATION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ABUSE; MALE; NARCOTIC DEPENDENCE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; RHESUS MONKEY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STIMULUS; THERAPY EFFECT;

ANESTHETICS; ANIMALS; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DEPRESSANTS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; ETHANOL; FEMALE; INDIVIDUALITY; KETAMINE; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; METHOHEXITAL; PIPERIDINES; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84866389108     PISSN: 13556215     EISSN: 13691600     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2011.00335.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anthony JC, Warner LA, Kessler RC, (1994) Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances, and inhalants: basic findings from the National Comorbidity Survey. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2: 244-268.
2. Belin D, Balado E, Piazza PV, Deroche-Gamonet V, (2009) Pattern of intake and drug craving predict the development of cocaine addiction-like behavior in rats. Biol Psychiatry 65: 863-868.
3. Belin D, Mar AC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ, (2008) High Impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking. Science 320: 1352-1355.
4. Christensen CJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Huntsberry ME, Riley AL, (2008a) Essential value of cocaine and food in rats: tests of the exponential model of demand. Psychopharmacology 198: 221-229.
5. Christensen CJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Roma PG, Riley AL, (2008b) Demand for cocaine and food over time. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 91: 209-216.
6. Flagel SB, Watson SJ, Akil H, Robinson TE, (2008) Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization. Behav Brain Res 186: 48-56.
7. Greenwald MK, (2008) Behavioral economic analysis of drug preference using multiple choice procedure data. Drug Alcohol Depend 93: 103-110.
8. Hursh SR, Silberberg A, (2008) Economic demand and essential value. Psychol Rev 115: 186-198.
9. Hursh SR, Winger G, (1995) Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav 64: 373-384.
10. Johnson C, Drgon T, Liu Q-R, Zhang P-W, Walther D, Li C-Y, Anthony JC, Ding Y, Eaton WW, Uhl GR, (2008) Genome wide association for substance dependence: convergent results from epidemiological and research volunteer samples. BMC Med Genet 9: 113.
11. MacKillop J, Murphy JG, Tidey JW, Kahler CW, Ray LA, Bickel WK, (2009) Latent structure of facets of alcohol reinforcement from a behavioral economic demand curve. Psychopharmacology 203: 33-40.
12. Nader MA, Woolverton WL, (1992) Choice between cocaine and food by rhesus monkeys: effects of conditions of food availability. Behav Pharmacol 3: 635-638.
13. National Institute on Drug Abuse (2010) Epidemiologic Trends in Drug Abuse, Proceedings of the Community Epidemiology Work Group, Vol. 1. May, 2010, NIH Pub. No. 10-7421. Bethesda, MD: NIH, DHHS.
14. National Research Council (1996) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
15. Negus SS, (2003) Rapid assessment of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys: effects of environmental manipulations and treatment with d-amphetamine and flupenthixol. Neuropsychopharmacology 28: 919-931.
16. Osby U, Liljenberg J, Kokcum I, Gunnar A, Terenius L, (2010) Genes and alcohol. Eur Psychiatry 25: 281-283.
17. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H, (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability of amphetamine self-administration. Science 245: 1511-1513.
18. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Mormede P, Le Moal M, Simon H, (1990) Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration. Behav Pharmacol 1: 339-345.
19. Stephens DN, Duka T, Crombag HS, Cunningham CL, Heilig M, Crabbe JC, (2010) Reward sensitivity: issues of measurement, and achieving consilience between human and animal phenotypes. Addict Biol 15: 145-168.
20. Tsuang MT, Lyons MJ, Meyer JM, Doyle T, Eisen SA, Goldberg J, True W, Lin N, Toomey R, Eaves L, (1998) Co-occurrence of abuse of different drugs in men: the role of drug-specific and shared vulnerabilities. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55: 967-972.
21. Uhl GR, (2006) Molecular genetics of addiction vulnerability. NeuroRx 3: 295-301.
22. Wade-Galuska T, Winger G, Woods JH, (2007) A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self-administration in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 194: 563-572.
23. Wagner FA, Anthony JC, (2002) Into the world of illegal drug use: exposure opportunity and other mechanisms linking the use of alcohol, tobacco, marijuana, and cocaine. Am J Epidemiol 155: 918-925.
24. Winger G, Galuska CM, Hursh SR, (2007) Modification of ethanol's reinforcing effectiveness in rhesus monkeys by cocaine, flunitrazepam, or gamma-hydroxybutyrate. Psychopharmacology 193: 587-598.