Groundwater-surface water interactions in a lowland watershed: Source contribution to stream flow

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 26, Issue 21, 2012, Pages 3195-3206

  Guinn Garrett, C ^a,b   Vulava, Vijay M ^a   Callahan, Timothy J ^a   Jones, Martin L ^a  

^a School of Business and Economics   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Coastal plain watersheds; End member mixing analysis; Groundwater surface water interactions; Hydrograph separation

Indexed keywords

ANALYTE CONCENTRATION; ANTECEDENT SOIL MOISTURE; CHEMICAL DATA; COASTAL PLAIN; END-MEMBER MIXING ANALYSIS; GROUND WATER RECHARGE; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROGRAPH SEPARATION; HYDROLOGIC PROCESS; INTERFLOW; LAND-USE CHANGE; LOWLAND WATERSHEDS; POPULATION GROWTH; POTENTIAL EFFECTS; RIPARIAN GROUNDWATER; SOIL WATER; SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS; SOUTH CAROLINA; STORM EVENTS; STORM FLOW; STREAM SITES; STREAMBEDS; TIME SEQUENCES; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; USDA FOREST SERVICE; WATER CHEMISTRY; WATERSHED HYDROLOGY;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COASTAL ZONES; FORESTRY; HYDROCHEMISTRY; LANDFORMS; MIXING; POPULATION STATISTICS; RUNOFF; SOIL MOISTURE; SOURCE SEPARATION; STORMS; STREAM FLOW; URBAN GROWTH; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS);

COASTAL PLAIN; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROGRAPH; LAND USE CHANGE; LOWLAND ENVIRONMENT; POPULATION GROWTH; PRECIPITATION INTENSITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL MOISTURE; STREAMFLOW; URBANIZATION; WATER CHEMISTRY; WATERSHED;

COASTS; ECOLOGY; GROUND WATER; HEALTH; HYDROLOGY; SOUTH CAROLINA; SURFACE WATER; WATER QUALITY; WATER SHEDS; WATER SUPPLY;

CHARLESTON; SOUTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84866364632     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8257     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen J, Lu K. 2003. Modeling and prediction of future urban growtn in the Charleston region of South Carolina: A GIS-based integrated approach. Conservation Ecology 8: 2.
2. Amatya D, Radecki-Pawlik A. 2007. Flow dynamics of three experimental forested watersheds in coastal South Carolina (USA). ACTA Scientiarum Polonorum, Formatio Circumiectus 6: 3-17.
3. Amatya D, Skaggs R, Gregory J. 1995. Comparison of methods for estimating REF-ET. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 121: 427-435.
4. Burns D, McDonnell J, Hooper R, Peters N, Freer J, Kendall C, Beven K. 2001. Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end-member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA). Hydrological Processes 15: 1903-1924.
5. Callahan T, Vulava V, Passarello M, Garrett C. 2011. Estimating groundwater recharge in lowland forested watersheds. In Review.
6. Christophersen N, Hooper R. 1992. Multivariate analysis of stream water chemical data: the use of principal components analysis for the end-member mixing problem. Water Resources Research 28: 99-107.
7. Christophersen N, Neal C, Hooper R, Vogt R, Andersen S. 1990. Modelling streamwater chemistry as a mixture of soilwater end-members--A step towards second-generation acidification models. Journal of Hydrology 116: 307-320.
8. Dingman S. 1994. Physical hydrology. Macmillan Pub. Co.: New York, NY; 575.
9. Donahoe R. 1997. Modeling wetland chemistry using end-member mixing analysis constained by isotopic data. Seventh Annual V.M. Goldschmidt Conference. Tucson, AZ. Cambridge Publications, Cambridge, UK
10. Eshleman K, Pollard J, O'Brien A. 1993. Determination of contributing areas for saturation overland flow from chemical hydrograph seperations. Water Resources Research 29: 3577-3587.
11. Eshleman K, Pollard J, O'Brien A. 1994. Interactions between groundwater and surface water in a virginia coastal plain watershed. 1. Hydrological flowpaths. Hydrological Processes 8: 389-410.
12. Farahmand T, Fleming S, Quilty E. 2007. Detection and visualization of storm hydrograph changes under urbanization: An impulse response approach. Journal of Environmental Management 85: 93-100.
13. Faye R, Mayer G. 1990. Ground-water flow and stream-aquifer relations in the northern coastal plain of Georgia and adjacent parts of Alabama and South Carolina. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report U.S. Geological Survey.
14. Haley E. 2007. Field measurements and hydrologic modeling of the Turkey Creek watershed, South Carolina. College of Charleston. MS Thesis; 168pp.
15. Harder S, Amatya D, Callahan T, Trettin C, Hakkila J. 2007. Hydrology and Water Budget for a Forested Atlantic Coastal Plain Watershed, South Carolina1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43: 563-575.
16. Holland A, Sanger D, Gawle C, Lerberg S, Santiago M, Riekerk G, Zimmerman L, Scott G. 2004. Linkages between tidal creek ecosystems and the landscape and demographic attributes of their watersheds. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 298: 151-178.
17. Inamdar S, Mitchell M. 2007. Contributions of riparian and hillslope waters to storm runoff across multiple catchments and storm events in a glaciated forested watershed. Journal of Hydrology 341: 116-130.
18. Isaaks E, Srivastava R. 1989. Applied Geostatistics. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; 561.
19. James A, Roulet N. 2006. Investigating the applicability of end-member mixing analysis (EMMA) across scale: A study of eight small, nested catchments in a temperate forested watershed. Water Resources Research 42: W08434, DOI: 08410.01029/02005WR004419.
20. Jeffery A, Lu K. 2003. Modeling and prediction of future urban growth in the Charleston region of South Carolina: A GIS-based integrated approach. Conservation Ecology 8: 2.
21. Jensen M, Burman R, Allen R. 1990. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manual and Report on Engineering Practices New York, NY.
22. LaTorre-Torres I. 2007. Seasonal relationships between precipitation and stream flow patterns related to watershed characteristics of two third-order coastal plain watersheds in South Carolina. College of Charleston. MS Thesis; 220pp.
23. Lee K, Fetter Jr C, McCray J. 2003. Hydrogeology laboratory manual. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
24. Leopold L. 1968. Hydrology for urban land planning - a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. Geological Survey Circular United States Geological Survey. Washington, DC.
25. Lewis W. 1995. Wetlands: characteristics and boundaries. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.
26. Line D, McLaughlin R, Osmond D, Jennings G, Harman W, Lombardo L, Spooner J. 1998. Nonpoint Sources. Water Environment Research 70: 895-912.
27. McEachern P, Prepas E, Chanasyk D. 2006. Landscape control of water chemistry in northern boreal streams of Alberta. Journal of Hydrology 323: 303-324.
28. McHale M, McDonnell J, Mitchell M, Cirmo C. 2002. A field-based study of soil water and groundwater nitrate release in an Adirondack forested watershed. Water Resources Research 38: 10-31.
29. Mitch W, Gosselink J. 2000. Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY; 920.
30. Mulholland P. 1993. Hydrometric and stream chemistry evidence of three storm flowpaths in Walker Branch Watershed. Journal of Hydrology 151: 291-316.
31. Neal C. 1999. A view of water quality from the Plynlimon watershed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 1: 743-753.
32. Neal C, Hill T, Hill S, Reynolds B. 1999. Acid neutralization capacity measurements in surface and ground waters in the Upper River Severn, Plynlimon: from hydrograph splitting to water flow pathways. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 1: 687-696.
33. NRCS. 2010. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for Charleston, SC. National Resources Conservation Service.
34. Poff N, Bledsoe B, Cuhaciyan C. 2006. Hydrologic variation with land use across the contiguous United States: geomorphic and ecological consequences for stream ecosystems. Geomorphology 79: 264-285.
35. Priest S. 2004. Evaluation of ground-water contribution to stream flow in coastal Georgia and adjacent parts of Florida and South Carolina. 2004-5265. USGS Scientific Investigations Report, US Geological Survey. Washington, DC.
36. Schueler T. 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1: 100-111.
37. Slattery M, Gares P, Phillips J. 2006. Multiple modes of storm runoff generation in a North Carolina coastal plain watershed. Hydrological Processes 20: 2953-2969.
38. Sun G, McNulty S, Amatya D, Skaggs R, Swift L. 2002. A comparison of the watershed hydrology of coastal forested wetlands and the mountainous uplands in the Southern US. Journal of Hydrology 263: 92-104.
39. USACE. 1987. US Army Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1. US Army Corps of Engineers. Vicksburg, MS.
40. USFWS. 2010. National Wetlands Inventory for South Carolina. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Arlington, VA.
41. Wahl M, McKellar H, Williams T. 1997. Patterns of nutrient loading in forested and urbanized coastal streams. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 213: 111-131.
42. Watts L, Hawke R. 2003. The effects of urbanization on hydrologic response: a study of two coastal catchments. Journal of Hydrology (NZ) 42: 125-143.