Modeling and prediction of future urban growth in the Charleston region of South Carolina: A GIS-based integrated approach

Ecology and Society

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Allen, Jeffery ^a   Lu, Kang ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Charleston; Focus group; Geographic information system; Land use prediction Logistic regression model; Rule based model; Urban growth modeling

Indexed keywords

GIS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LAND USE CHANGE; MODELING; URBAN GROWTH;

CHARLESTON; NORTH AMERICA; SOUTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4243102999     PISSN: 17083087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/es-00595-080202     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allen, J., K. S. Lu, and T. D. Potts. 2002. A GIS-based analysis and prediction of land-use change in a coastal tourism destination area. In M. I. Miller, J. Auyong, and N. P. Hadley, editors. 2002. Proceedings of the 1999 International Symposium on Coastal and Marine Tourism: Balancing Tourism and Conservation. April 26 - 29, 1999, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Washington Sea Grant Program and School of Marine Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Oregon Sea Grant College Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon; and Oceans Blue Foundation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
2. Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E. Witmer. 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964.
3. Berkeley, Charleston and Dorchester Council of Government (BCD COG). 1997. Twenty year time series analysis of satellite remote sensor data for environmental and developmental change along Coastal Georgia and South Carolina. Final report submitted to NASA via CD ROM.
4. Brown, D. L., and J. M. Wardwell. 1980. New directions in urban-rural migration: the population turnaround in rural America. Academic Press, Inc. New York, New York, USA.
5. Casti, J. L. 1994. Complexification: explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. HarperCollins, New York, New York, USA.
6. Clarke, K. 1997. Long term urban growth prediction using a cellular automation model and GIS: applications in San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Paper presented at the International Workshop on GIS in Spatial Population Analysis and Regional Economic Development, March 24 - 25, 1997. Hong Kong.
7. Frey, W. H. and A. Speare. 1988. Regional and metropolitan growth and decline in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
8. Kaiser, E. J., D. R. Godschalk, and F. S. Chapin, Jr. 1995. Urban land use planning. 4th edition. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
9. Hosmer, J. D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 1989. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
10. Landis, J. D. 1995. Imagining land use futures: applying the California urban futures model. Journal of the American Planning Association 61: 438 - 457.
11. Landis, J. D., and M. Zhang. 1997. Modeling urban land use change: the next generation of the California urban future model. Paper submitted to the Land Use Modeling Workshop, USGS EROS Data Center, June 5 - 6, 1997, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA. (Online.) URL: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/landuse97.
12. Lee, D. B. 1973. Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39(3): 163 - 178.
13. Lee, D. B. 1994. Retrospective on large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 60(1): 35 - 40.
14. Long, L. 1988. Migration and residential mobility in the United States. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
15. Lu, K. S. 2001. A parcel-GIS based multinomial logistic model for destination land use prediction. Dissertation. Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
16. McFadden, D. 1973. Conditional logit analysis of quantitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
17. Pijanowski, B. C., D. T. Long, S. H. Gage, and W. E. Cooper. 1997. A land transformation model: conceptual elements, spatial object class hierarchies, GIS command syntax and an application for Michigan's Saginaw Bay watershed. Submitted to the Land Use Modeling Workshop, USGS EROS Data Center, June 5 - 6, 1997, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA. (Online.) URL: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/landuse97.
18. Rusk, D., J. Blair, and E. D. Kelly. 1997. Debate on theories of David Rusk. Edited transcript of proceedings in The Regionalist 2(3): 11 - 29.
19. Southworth, F. 1995. A technical review of urban land use - transportation models as tools for evaluating vehicle travel reduction strategies. ORNL - 6881. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.
20. Sui, D. Z. 1997. The syntax and semantics of urban modeling: versions vs. visions. Paper submitted to the Land Use Modeling Workshop, USGS EROS Data Center, June 5 - 6, 1997, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA. (Online.) URL: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/landuse97.
21. Wegener, M. 1994. Operational urban models: state of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 17 - 29.