Investors' Reliance on Analysts' Stock Recommendations and Mitigating Mechanisms for Potential Overreliance

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 991-1012

  Kelly, Khim ^a   Low, Bernardine ^b   Tan, Hun Tong ^c   Tan, Seet Koh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b SINGAPORE MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866327065     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: 19113846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01138.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson, C. A., M. R. Lepper, and L. Ross 1980. Perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (6): 1037-49.
2. Asquith, P., M. B. Mikhail, and A. S. Au 2005. Information content of equity analyst reports. Journal of Financial Economics 75 (2): 245-82.
3. Barber, B. M., R. Lehavy, M. McNichols, and B. Trueman 2006. Buys, holds, and sells: The distribution of investment banks' stock ratings and the implications for the profitability of analysts' recommendations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 41 (1-2): 87-117.
4. Barber, B. M., R. Lehavy, and B. Trueman 2007. Comparing the stock recommendation performance of investment banks and independent research firms. Journal of Financial Economics 85 (2): 490-517.
5. Bradshaw, M. T. 2002. The use of target prices to justify sell-side analysts' stock recommendations. Accounting Horizons 16 (1): 27-41.
6. Bradshaw, M. T. 2004. How do analysts use their earnings forecasts in generating stock recommendations? The Accounting Review 79 (1): 25-50.
7. Bradshaw, M. T., S. A. Richardson, and R. G. Sloan 2006. The relation between corporate financing activities, analysts' forecasts and stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (1-2): 53-85.
8. Bruce, B. 2002. Stock analysts: Experts on whose behalf? Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 3 (4): 198-201.
9. Chaiken, S. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (5): 752-66.
10. Chaiken, S., and D. Maheswaran 1994. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 (3): 460-73.
11. Chen, S., and D. A. Matsumoto 2006. Favorable versus unfavorable recommendations: The impact on analyst access to management-provided information. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (4): 657-89.
12. Conover, W. J. 1980. Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
13. Dopuch, N., R. R. King, and R. Schwartz 2003. Independence in appearance and in fact: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (1): 79-114.
14. Easton, P. D. 2004. PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 73-95.
15. Epley, N., and T. Gilovich 2005. When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18 (3): 199-212.
16. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). 2005. Research analysts and research reports. NASD Rule No. 2711 (Last amended on June 6, 2005). Washington, DC: FINRA.
17. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). 2010. FINRA guide to understanding security analyst recommendations. Available online at http://www.finra.org/Investors/SmartInvesting/AdvancedInvesting/UnderstandingSecuritiesAnalystRecommendations/, retrieved June 7, 2010.
18. Fischhoff, B., P. S. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein 1978. Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4 (2): 330-44.
19. Gilbert, D. T., D. S. Krull, and P. S. Malone 1990. Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (4): 601-13.
20. Hirst, D. E., L. Koonce, and P. Simko 1995. Investor reactions to financial analysts' research reports. Journal of Accounting Research 33 (2): 335-51.
21. Hodge, F. D. 2001. Hyperlinking unaudited information to audited financial statements: Effects on investor judgments. The Accounting Review 76 (4): 675-91.
22. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6 (2): 65-70.
23. Irvine, P. J. 2004. Analysts' forecasts and brokerage-firm trading. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 125-49.
24. Jackson, A. R. 2005. Trade generation, reputation, and sell-side analysts. The Journal of Finance 60 (2): 673-717.
25. Jegadeesh, N., J. Kim, S. D. Krische, and C. M. C. Lee 2004. Analyzing the analysts: When do recommendations add value? The Journal of Finance 59 (3): 1083-124.
26. Kemmelmeier, M. 2004. Separating the wheat from the chaff: Does discriminating between diagnostic and nondiagnostic information eliminate the dilution effect? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 17 (3): 231-43.
27. Kenny, D. A., D. A. Kashy, and N. Bolger 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In The handbook of social psychology, vol. 1, ed. D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 233-65. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
28. LeBoeuf, R. A., and E. Shafir 2009. Anchoring on the "here" and "now" in time and distance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (1): 81-93.
29. Libby, R., R. Bloomfield, and M. W. Nelson 2002. Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 (8): 775-810.
30. Libby, R., J. E. Hunton, H. T. Tan, and N. Seybert 2008. Relationship incentives and the optimistic/pessimistic pattern in analysts' forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (1): 173-98.
31. MacKinnon, D. P. 2008. Introduction to statistical mediation analyses. New York: Erlbaum.
32. Malmendier, U., and D. Shanthikumar 2007. Are small investors naïve about incentives? Journal of Financial Economics 85 (2): 457-89.
33. Mikhail, M. B., B. R. Walther, and R. H. Willis 2007. When security analysts talk, who listens? The Accounting Review 82 (5): 1227-53.
34. Motley Fool Staff. 2008. The fool ratio explained. Available online at: http://www.fool.com/School/TheFoolRatioExplained.htm, retrieved July 17, 2011.
35. Neter, J., M. H. Kutner, C. J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman 1996. Applied linear statistical models, 4th ed. Chicago: Irwin.
36. New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). 2008. Communications with the public. NYSE Rule No. 472 (Last amended on April 16, 2008). New York: NYSE.
37. Nunnally, J. C., and I. H. Bernstein 1994. Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38. Opdyke, J. D., and R. Simon 2003. How you come out in Wall Street's deal - For investors, $1.4 billion settlement offers little cash, but promises new ways to evaluate quality of research. The Wall Street Journal (New York), April 29, D1.
39. Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo 1986. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
40. Rosenthal, R., R. L. Rosnow, and D. R. Rubin 2000. Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Rosnow, R. L., and R. Rosenthal 2002. Contrasts and correlations in theory assessment. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 27 (1): 59-66.
42. Ruffy, F. 2003. Stock talk: Looking for bargains with the PEG ratio. Available online at: http://www.optionetics.com/articles/article.asp?id=8058, retrieved July 17, 2011.
43. Santoli, M. 2001. The whole truth: It's time to repair Wall Street's dubious research machine - and here's how. Barron's (May 28): 23-26.
44. Schapiro, M. 2002. Speech delivered at the Securities Industries Association (SIA) Research and Regulation Conference, New York, April 9. Available online at: http://www.finra.org/PressRoom/SpeechesTestimony/MaryL.Schapiro/P011049, retrieved July 17, 2011.
45. Schul, Y. 1993. When warning succeeds: The effect of warning on success in ignoring invalid information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29 (1): 42-62.
46. Schul, Y. 2004. Coping with invalid messages by increasing or decreasing processing complexity. In Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes, ed. G. Haddock and G. R. Maio, 227-50. London: Psychology Press.
47. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2002. Commission approves rules to address analyst conflicts; SEC also requires EDGAR filings by foreign issuers. Available online at http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2002-63.htm, retrieved July 17, 2011.
48. Securities and Exchange Commission. 2008. Analyzing analyst recommendations. Available online at http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/analysts.htm, retrieved July 17, 2011.
49. Shrout, P. E., and N. Bolger 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 7 (4): 422-45.
50. Steginga, S. K., and S. Occhipinti 2004. The application of the heuristic-systematic processing model to treatment decision making about prostate cancer. Medical Decision Making 24 (6): 573-83.
51. Strack, F., and T. Mussweiler 1997. Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73 (3): 437-46.
52. Taulli, T. 2004. The EDGAR online guide to decoding financial statements: Tips, tools, and techniques for becoming a savvy investor. Fort Lauderdale, FL: J. Ross Publishing.
53. Unger, L. S. 2001. How can analysts maintain their independence? Speech delivered at the Ray Garrett Jr. Corporate and Securities Law Institute, Evanston, IL, April 19. Available online at http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch477.htm, retrieved July 17, 2011.
54. Wilson, T. D., C. E. Houston, K. M. Etling, and N. Brekke 1996. A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 (4): 387-402.