Enzymology and structure of the GH13_31 glucan 1,6-α-glucosidase that confers isomaltooligosaccharide utilization in the probiotic lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM

Journal of Bacteriology

Volumn 194, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 4249-4259

  Møller, Marie S ^a   Fredslund, Folmer ^a   Majumder, Avishek ^a   Nakai, Hiroyuki ^a   Poulsen, Jens Christian N ^b   Leggio, Leila Lo ^b   Svensson, Birte ^a   Hachem, Maher Abou ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; DEXTRAN; GLUCAN 1,6 ALPHA GLUCOSIDASE; GLYCOSIDASE; GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASE FAMILY 13 SUBFAMILY 31; ISOMALTOOLIGOSACCHARIDE DERIVATIVE; PROBIOTIC AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOINFORMATICS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME METABOLISM; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; ENZYMOLOGY; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; OPERON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

BINDING SITES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GLUCOSIDASES; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; OLIGOSACCHARIDES; OPERON; PHYLOGENY; PROBIOTICS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS;

LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS NCFM; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS;

EID: 84866321639     PISSN: 00219193     EISSN: 10985530     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00622-12     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abbott DW, et al. 2010. The molecular basis of glycogen breakdown and transport in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Mol. Microbiol. 77:183-199.
2. Afonine P, Grosse-Kunstleve R, Adams P. 2005. A robust bulk-solvent correction and anisotropic scaling procedure. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 61:850-855.
3. Altermann E, et al. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:3906-3912.
4. Barkholt V, Jensen AL. 1989. Amino-acid analysis-determination of cysteine plus half-cystine in proteins after hydrochloric-acid hydrolysis with a disulfide compound as additive. Anal. Biochem. 177:318-322.
5. Barrangou R, Altermann E, Hutkins R, Cano R, Klaenhammer TR. 2003. Functional and comparative genomic analyses of an operon involved in fructooligosaccharide utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100:8957-8962.
6. Barrangou R, et al. 2006. Global analysis of carbohydrate utilization by Lactobacillus acidophilus using cDNA microarrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:3816-3821.
7. Britton HTS, Robinson RA. 1931. Universal buffer solutions and the dissociation constant of veronal. J. Chem. Soc. 1931:1456-1462.
8. Cantarel BL, et al. 2009. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:D233-D238.
9. Chen VB, et al. 2010. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66:12-21.
10. Davies G, Wilson K, Henrissat B. 1997. Nomenclature for sugar-binding subsites in glycosyl hydrolases. Biochem. J. 321:557-559.
11. de Vrese M, Schrezenmeir J. 2008. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 111:1-66.
12. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792-1797.
13. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. 2010. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66:486-501.
14. Fredslund F, et al. 2011. Crystal Structure of α-galactosidase from Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM: insight into tetramer formation and substrate binding. J. Mol. Biol. 412:466-480.
15. Fukuda S, et al. 2011. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature. 469:543-547.
16. Gilliland SE, Speck ML, Morgan CG. 1975. Detection of Lactobacillus-acidophilus in aeces of humans, pigs, and chickens. Appl. Microbiol. 30:541-545.
17. Goffin D, et al. 2011. Will isomalto-oligosaccharides, a well-established functional food in Asia, break through the European and American market? The status of knowledge on these prebiotics. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 51:394-409.
18. Gotsche S, Dahl MK. 1995. Purification and characterization of the phospho-α(1,1)glucosidase (TreA) of Bacillus subtilis 168. J. Bacteriol. 177:2721-2726.
19. Hondoh H, et al. 2008. Substrate recognition mechanism of α-1,6-glucosidic linkage hydrolyzing enzyme, dextran glucosidase from Streptococcus mutans. J. Mol. Biol. 378:913-922.
20. Huson DH, et al. 2007. Dendroscope: An interactive viewer for large phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics 8:460. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-460.
21. Kabsch W. 2010. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66:125-132.
22. Kaneko T, Yokoyama A, Suzuki M. 1995. Digestibility characteristics of isomaltooligosaccharides in comparison with several saccharides using the rat jejunum loop method. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 59:1190-1194.
23. Kaneko T, et al. 1994. Effects of isomaltooligosaccharides with different degrees of polymerization on human fecal bifidobacteria. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 58:2288-2290.
24. Kano T, Usami Y, Adachi T, Tatematsu M, Hirano K. 1996. Inhibition of purified human sucrase and isomaltase by ethanolamine derivatives. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 19:341-344.
25. Ketabi A, Dieleman LA, Gaenzle MG. 2011. Influence of isomaltooligosaccharides on intestinal microbiota in rats. J. Appl. Microbiol. 110:1297-1306.
26. Kobayashi M, et al. 2011. Calcium ion-dependent increase in thermostability of dextran glucosidase from Streptococcus mutans. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 75:1557-1563.
27. Larkin MA, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 23:2947-2948.
28. Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ. 2008. Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72:728-764.
29. Macfarlane S, Macfarlane GT, Cummings JH. 2006. Review article: prebiotics in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 24:701-714.
30. MacGregor EA, Janecek S, Svensson B. 2001. Relationship of sequence and structure to specificity in the α-amylase family of enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1546:1-20.
31. Majumder A, et al. 2011. Proteome reference map of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and quantitative proteomics towards understanding the prebiotic action of lactitol. Proteomics. 11:3470-3481.
32. Makelainen H, Hasselwander O, Rautonen N, Ouwehand AC. 2009. Panose, a new prebiotic candidate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 49:666-672.
33. Monedero V, Yebra MJ, Poncet S, Deutscher J. 2008. Maltose transport in Lactobacillus casei and its regulation by inducer exclusion. Res. Microbiol. 159:94-102.
34. Nakai H, et al. 2009. The maltodextrin transport system and metabolism in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM and production of novel α-glucosides through reverse phosphorolysis by maltose phosphorylase. FEBS J. 276:7353-7365.
35. Nielsen MM, et al. 2009. Two secondary carbohydrate binding sites on the surface of barley α-amylase 1 have distinct functions and display synergy in hydrolysis of starch granules. Biochemistry. 48:7686-7697.
36. Nieto C, Espinosa M, Puyet A. 1997. The maltose/maltodextrin regulon of Streptococcus pneumoniae: differential promoter regulation by the transcriptional repressor MalR. J. Biol. Chem. 272:30860-30865.
37. O'Flaherty S, Klaenhammer TR. 2010. The role and potential of probiotic bacteria in the gut, and the communication between gut microflora and gut/host. Int. Dairy J. 20:262-268.
38. Oslancova A, Janecek S. 2002. Oligo-1,6-glucosidase and neopullulanase enzyme subfamilies from the α-amylase family defined by the fifth conserved sequence region. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59:1945-1959.
39. Pokusaeva K, O'Connell-Motherway M, Zomer A, Fitzgerald GF, van Sinderen D. 2009. Characterization of two novel α-glucosidases from Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:1135-1143.
40. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A. 2000. EMBOSS: The European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 16:276-277.
41. Rimmele M, Boos W. 1994. Trehalose-6-phosphate hydrolase of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 176:5654-5664.
42. Saburi W, et al. 2008. Structure-function relationship of substrate length specificity of dextran glucosidase from Streptococcus mutans. Biologia. 63:1000-1005.
43. Saburi W, Mori H, Saito S, Okuyama M, Kimura A. 2006. Structural elements in dextran glucosidase responsible for high specificity to long chain substrate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1764:688-698.
44. Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR. 2001. The scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J. Dairy Sci. 84:319-331.
45. Schonert S, et al. 2006. Maltose and maltodextrin utilization by Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 188:3911-3922.
46. Stam MR, Danchin EGJ, Rancurel C, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. 2006. Dividing the large glycoside hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of α-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 19:555-562.
47. Suzuki Y, Tomura Y. 1986. Purification and characterization of Bacillus coagulans oligo-1,6-glucosidase. Eur. J. Biochem. 158:77-83.
48. Suzuki Y, Aoki R, Hayashi H. 1982. Assignment of a p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside-hydrolyzing α-glucosidase of Bacillus cereus ATCC 7064 to an exo-oligo-1,6-glucosidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 704:476-483.
49. Swennen K, Courtin CM, Delcour JA. 2006. Non-digestible oligosaccharides with prebiotic properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 46:459-471.
50. Terwilliger TC, et al. 2008. Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the PHENIX AutoBuild wizard. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 64:61-69.
51. Vagin A, Teplyakov A. 1997. MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 30:1022-1025.
52. van den Broek LAM, Struijs K, Verdoes JC, Beldman G, Voragen AGJ. 2003. Cloning and characterization of two α-glucosidases from Bifidobacterium adolescentis DSM20083. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61:55-60.
53. Wallace TC, et al. 2011. Human gut microbiota and its relationship to health and disease. Nutr. Rev. 69:392-403.
54. Watanabe K, Miyake K, Suzuki Y. 2001. Identification of catalytic and substrate-binding site residues in Bacillus cereus ATCC 7064 oligo-1,6-glucosidase. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65:2058-2064.
55. Watanabe K, Fujiwara H, Inui K, Suzuki Y. 2002. Oligo-1,6-glucosidase from a thermophile, Bacillus thermoglucosidasius KP 1006, was efficiently produced by combinatorial expression of GroEL in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 35:35-43.
56. Watanabe K, Hata Y, Kizaki H, Katsube Y, Suzuki Y. 1997. The refined crystal structure of Bacillus cereus oligo-1,6-glucosidase at 2.0 angstrom resolution: Structural characterization of proline-substitution sites for protein thermostabilization. J. Mol. Biol. 269:142-153.
57. Yamamoto K, Nakayama A, Yamamoto Y, Tabata S. 2004. Val216 decides the substrate specificity of α-glucosidase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 271:3414-3420.
58. Yen C, Tseng Y, Kuo Y, Lee M, Chen H. 2011. Long-term supplementation of isomalto-oligosaccharides improved colonic microflora profile, bowel function, and blood cholesterol levels in constipated elderly people: a placebo-controlled, diet-controlled trial. Nutrition. 27:445-450.