Risk of collision between service vessels and offshore wind turbines

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 109, Issue , 2013, Pages 18-31

  Dai, Lijuan ^a   Ehlers, Sören ^a   Rausand, Marvin ^a   Utne, Ingrid Bouwer ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Collision risk; Offshore wind turbine; Risk analysis; Service vessel

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; RISK ANALYSIS; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINES;

COLLISION RISKS; LOW SPEED; OFF-SHORE WIND ENERGY; OFFSHORE WIND FARMS; OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES; RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK; SAFE OPERATION; STRUCTURAL DAMAGES; WIND FARM;

SERVICE VESSELS;

EID: 84866299905     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. den Boon H, Just H, Hansen PF, Ravn ES, Frouws K, Otto S, et al., Reduction of ship collision risks for offshore wind farms - safeship. In: Proceedings of European wind energy conference & exhibition (EWEC); 2004.
2. F. Biehl, and E. Lehmann Collisions of ships with offshore wind turbines calculation and risk evaluation J. Köller, J. Köppel, W. Peters, Offshore wind energy research on environmental impacts 2006 Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 281 304
3. DNV-OS-J101. Design of offshore wind turbine structures. Hovik: Det Norske Veritas (DNV); 2004.
4. HSE. Ship/platform collision incident database (2001). Tech. rep. London: Health and Safety Executive; 2003.
5. Petroleum Safety Authority (PSA). Risk of collisions with visiting vessels. Retrieved November 24, 2011. URL 〈 http://www.ptil.no/news/risk- of-collisions-with-visiting-vessels-article7524-79.html 〉.
6. Kvitrud A. Collision between platforms and ships in norway in the period 2001-2010. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering (OMAE2011); 2011.
7. Caithness Windfarm Information Forum. Wind turbine accident compilation. Retrieved April 18, 2012. URL 〈 http://www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk/ 〉.
8. Sharples M, Sharples BJM. Damage and critical analysis of accidents to assist in avoiding accidents on offshore wind farms on the OCS. Tech. rep. Offshore: Risk & Technology Consulting Inc.; 2010.
9. Vinnem JE. Offshore risk assessment: principles, modelling and applications of QRA studies. In: Collision risk modelling. London: Springer; 2007. p. 353-97 [chapter 10].
10. M. Rausand Risk assessment: theory, methods, and applications 2011 John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, New Jersey
11. EWEA. The European offshore wind industry - key trends and statistics: 1st half 2011. Brussels: European Wind Energy Association (EWEA); 2011.
12. Offshore Wind Energy Website. Offshore technology: operation and maintenance. Retrieved June 17, 2011. URL 〈 http://www.offshorewindenergy. org/ca-owee 〉.
13. López JA, Izquierdo PPC, Andreu AG, López AR. Offshore access: a key driver to increase offshore wind farms efficiency. In: Proceedings of European wind energy conference & exhibition (EWEC), Warsaw; 2010.
14. ZODIAC: Military & Professional Boats. Demo boats as of august 31, 2009. Retrieved June 17, 2011. URL 〈 http://www.zodiacmilpro.com/demo.php 〉.
15. Windcat Workboats. Windcat mk i, ii, iii series. Retrieved June 17, 2011. URL 〈 http://www.windcatworkboats.com 〉.
16. Salzmann DC. Ampelmann: development of the access system for offshore wind turbines. Ph.D. thesis. Delft: TU Delft; 2010.
17. Ampelmann. A motion-compensating platform for accessing wind turbines. Retrieved October 12, 2011. URL 〈 http://admin.thomas.slik.eu/bedrijven/ ampelmann/data/Publications/Ampelmann%20- %20a%20motion%20compensating%20platform%20for%20accessing%20%wind%20turbines. pdf 〉.
18. RenewableUK. Guidelines for onshore and offshore wind farms: health & safety in the wind energy industry sector; 2010.
19. S. Kristiansen Maritime transportation. Safety management and risk analysis 2005 Elsevier
20. J. Spouge A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations 1999 DNV Technica
21. Statoil. Hywind by statoil. The floating wind turbine. Facts. Retrieved April 18, 2012. URL 〈 http://www.statoil.com 〉.
22. Eggen A, Heggset J, Gjerde O, Valland A, Nonås L. Deep sea offshore wind turbine technology. Operation and maintenance - state of the art study (restricted report). Tech. rep. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF; 2008.
23. Rausand M. Reliability data sources. Retrieved March 15, 2012. URL 〈 http://www.ntnu.edu/ross/info/data 〉.
24. Haugen S, Seljelid J, Sklet S, Vinnem JE, Aven T. Operational risk analysis - total analysis of physical and non-physical barriers. Tech. rep. Preventor, Bryne; 2007.
25. Friis-Hansen A. Bayesian networks as a decision support tool in marine applications. Ph.D. thesis. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering; 2000.
26. M. Hänninen, and P. Kujala Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model Reliability Engineering and System Safety 102 2012 27 40
27. U.B. Kjærulff, and A.L. Madsen Bayesian networks and influence diagrams a guide to construction and analysis 2008 Springer Berlin
28. af Geijerstam K, Svensson H. Ship collision risk - an identification and evaluation of important factors in collisions with offshore installations. Tech. rep. Lund: Department of Fire Safety Engineering and Systems Safety, Lund University; 2008.
29. Ali MS. Risk analysis of supply vessel operations. Masters thesis. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2011.
30. P. Trucco, E. Cagno, F. Ruggeri, and O. Grande A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis a case study in maritime transportation Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 2008 823 834
31. J. Vinnem, J. Seljelid, S. Haugen, S. Sklet, and T. Aven Generalized methodology for operational risk analysis of offshore installations Journal of Risk and Reliability 223 2009 87 97
32. F. Brissaud, A. Barros, C. Bérenguer, and D. Charpentier Failure rate evaluation with influencing factors Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96 2 2011 299 313
33. A. Zitrou, T. Bedfords, and L. Walls An influence diagram extension of the unified partial method for common cause failures Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 4 4 2007 111 128
34. M.S. Hamada, A. Wilson, C.S. Reese, and H. Martz Bayesian reliability 2008 Springer London
35. IEC 61400-3. Wind turbines Part 3: design requirements for offshore wind turbines. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2009.
36. S. Ehlers A review of collision and grounding damage assessment method Marine Systems & Ocean Technology 6 1 2011 5 15
37. S. Ehlers, and P. Varsta Strain and stress relation for non-linear finite element simulations Thin-Walled Structures 47 2009 1203 1217
38. S. Ehlers The influence of the material relation on the accuracy of collision simulations Marine Structures 23 2010 462 474
39. Hallquist J. LS-DYNA keyword users manual, version 971. California: Livermore Software Technology Cooperation; 2007.
40. DNV/Riso. Guidelines for design of wind turbines. Copenhagen: Det Norske Veritas (DNV) and Riso National Laboratory; 2002.
41. Haugen S. An overview over ship-platform collision risk modelling. In: Risk and reliability in marine technology. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema; 1998. p. 93-106.
42. I.B. Utne Maintenance strategies for deep-sea offshore wind turbines Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 16 4 2010 367 381