Space, Time, and Objects

The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Grush, Rick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alexandre pouget; Behavioral objects; Emulation theory; Information processing network; Nervous system; Objects; Space; Spatial representation; Temporal representation; Time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866173850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195304787.003.0013     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Blakemore, S. J., Goodbody, S. J., and Wolpert, D. M. (1998). Predicting the consequences of our own actions: The role of sensorimotor context estimation. Journal of Neuroscience 18: 7511-7518.
2. Bryson, A. E., and Yu-Chi, Ho. (1975). Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere.
3. Denier van der Gon, J. J. (1988). Motor control: Aspects of its organization, control signals and properties. In W. Wallinga, H. B. K. Boom and J. de Vries (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the International Electrophysiological Society. New York: Elsevier.
4. Desmurget, M., and Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 423-431.
5. Duhamel, J.-R., Colby, C., and Goldberg, M. E. (1992). The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 255: 90-92.
6. Grush, R. (2000). Self, world and space: The meaning and mechanisms of ego- and allocentric spatial representation. Brain and Mind 1: 59-92.
7. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 377-442.
8. Grush, R. (2005). Internal models and the construction of time: Generalizing from state estimation to trajectory estimation to address temporal features of perception, including temporal illusions. Journal of Neural Engineering 2: S209-S218.
9. Houk, J. C., Singh, S. P., Fischer, C., and Barto, A. (1990). An adaptive sensorimotor network inspired by the anatomy and physiology of the cerebellum. In W. T. Miller, R.S. Sutton, and P. J. Werbos (Eds.), Neural Networks for Control. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
10. Ito, M. (1970). Neurophysiological aspects of the cerebellar motor control system. International Journal of Neurology 7: 162-176.
11. Ito, M. (1984). The Cerebellum and Neural Control. New York: Raven Press.
12. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14: S103-S109.
13. Johnson, S. H. (2000). Thinking ahead: The case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition 74: 33-70.
14. Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(d): 35-45.
15. Kalman, R. and Bucy, R. S. (1961). New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. Journal of Basic Engineering 83(d): 95-108.
16. Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9: 718-727.
17. Kerzel, D. (2002). A matter of design: No representational momentum without predictability. Visual Cognition 9: 66-80.
18. Krakauer, J. W. Ghilardi, M.-F. and Ghez, C. (1999). Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching. Nature Neuroscience 2: 1026-1031.
19. Mach, E. (1896). Contributions to the Analysis of Sensations. Open Court Publishing.
20. Mehta, B. and Schaal, S. (2002). Forward models in visuomotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology 88: 942-953.
21. Mel, B. W. (1986). A connectionist learning model for 3-d mental rotation, zoom, and pan. In Proceedings of Eighth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 562-571.
22. Mel, B. W. (1988). MURPHY: A robot that learns by doing. In Neural Information Processing Systems. New York: American Institute of Physics, 544-553.
23. Pouget, A. Deneve, S. and Duhamel, J.-R. (2002). A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 3: 741-747.
24. Senior, C. Ward, J. and David, A. S. (2002). Representational momentum and the brain: An investigation into the functional necessity of V5/MT. Visual Cognition 9: 81-92.
25. von Helmholtz, H. (1910). Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik, vol. 3, 3rd ed. A. Gullstrand J. von Kries, and W. Nagel (Eds.). Leipzig: Voss.
26. Wolpert, D. M. Ghahramani, Z. and Flanagan, J. R. (2001). Perspectives and problems in motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5: 487-494.
27. Wolpert, D. M. Ghahramani, Z. and Jordan, M. I. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882.
28. Zipser, D. and Andersen, R. A. (1988). A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons. Nature 331 (6158): 679-684.