Evaluation of footprint contact area and pressure using a triple-row modification of the suture-bridge technique for rotator cuff repair

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1406-1412

  Ostrander, Roger V ^a   McKinney, Bart I ^a  

^a The Andrews Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; Basic science study; Biomechanics; Rotator cuff repair; Rotator cuff tear; Shoulder arthroscopy; Supraspinatus; Suture bridge; Triple row

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; ARTICLE; FILM; HUMERUS; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR; ROTATOR CUFF RUPTURE; SHOULDER SURGERY; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE BRIDGE TRECHNIQUE; SUTURING METHOD;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HUMERUS; PRESSURE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; ROTATOR CUFF; SHEEP; SUTURE ANCHORS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TENDON INJURIES;

EID: 84866166832     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: 15326500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ahmad C.S., Stewart A.M., Izquierdo R., Bigliani L.U. Tendon-bone interface motion in transosseous suture and suture anchor rotator cuff repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 2005, 33:1667-1671. 10.1177/0363546505278252.
2. Anderson K., Boothby M., Aschenbrener D., van Holsbeeck M. Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34:1899-1905. 10.1177/0363546506290187.
3. Andres B.M., Lam P.H., Murrell G.A. Tension, abduction, and surgical technique affect footprint compression after rotator cuff repair in an ovine model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010, 19:1018-1027. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.005.
4. Baums M.H., Geyer M., Büschken M., Buchhorn G.H., Spahn G., Klinger H.M. Tendon-bone contact pressure and biomechanical evaluation of a modified suture-bridge technique for rotator cuff repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010, 18:992-998. 10.1007/s00167-009-0941-7.
5. Baums M.H., Spahn G., Steckel H., Fischer A., Schultz W., Klinger H.M. Comparative evaluation of the tendon-bone interface contact pressure in different single- versus double-row suture anchor repair techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009, 17:1466-1472. 10.1007/s00167-009-0771-70.
6. Bishop J., Klepps S., Lo I.K., Bird J., Gladstone J.N., Flatow E.L. Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006, 15:290-299. 10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.017.
7. Cummins C.A., Appleyard R.C., Strickland S., Haen P.S., Chen S., Murrell G.A. Rotator cuff repair: an ex vivo analysis of suture anchor repair techniques on initial load to failure. Arthroscopy 2005, 21:1236-1241. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.022.
8. Frank J.B., ElAttrache N.S., Dines J.S., Blackburn A., Crues J., Tibone J.E. Repair site integrity after arthroscopic transosseous-equivalent suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 2008, 36:1496-1503. 10.1177/0363546507313574.
9. Fukubayashi T., Kurosawa H. The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee: a study of normal and osteoarthritic knee joints. Acta Orthop Scand 1980, 51:871-879.
10. Gerber C., Scneeberger A., Beck M., Schlegel U. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994, 76:371-380.
11. Glaser F.E., Gorab R.S., Lee T.Q. Edge loading of patellar components after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:493-499.
12. Hale J.E., Brown T.D. Contact stress gradient detection limits of Pressensor film. J Biomech Eng 1992, 114:352-357.
13. Huijsmans P.E., Pritchard M.P., Berghs B.M., van Rooyen K.S., Wallace A.L., de Beer J.F. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1248-1257. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00743.
14. Ide J., Maeda S., Takagi K. A comparison of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2005, 21:1090-1098. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.010.
15. Millar N.L., Wu X., Tantau R., Silverstone E., Murrell G.A. Open versus two forms of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:966-978. 10.1007/s11999-009-0706-0.
16. Nelson C.O., Sileo M.J., Grossman M.G., Serra-Hsu F. Single-row modified Mason-Allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison. Arthroscopy 2008, 24:941-948. 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.03.011.
17. Osti L., Papalia R., Paganelli M., Denaro E., Maffulli N. Arthroscopic vs mini-open rotator cuff repair. A quality of life impairment study. Int Orthop 2010, 34:389-394. 10.1007/s00264-009-0796-z.
18. Ostrander R.V., Andrews J.R. Arthroscopic triple-row rotator cuff repair: a modified suture-bridge technique. Orthopedics 2009, 32:566-570. 10.3928/01477447-20090624-14.
19. Park M.C., Elattrache N.S., Ahmad C.S., Tibone J.E. "Transosseous-equivalent" rotator cuff repair technique. Arthroscopy 2006, 22:1360.e1-1360.e5. 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.07.017.
20. Park M.C., ElAttrache N.S., Tibone J.E., Ahmad C.S., Jun B.J., Lee T.Q. Part I: footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007, 16:461-468. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.010.
21. Park M.C., Tibone J.E., ElAttrache N.S., Ahmad C.S., Jun B.J., Lee T.Q. Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007, 16:469-476. 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.011.
22. Peters K.S., Lam P.H., Murrell G.A. Repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical analysis of footprint contact pressure and strength in an ovine model. Arthroscopy 2010, 26:877-884. 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.04.007.
23. Sethi P.M., Noonan B.C., Cunningham J., Shreck E., Miller S. Repair results of 2-tendon rotator cuff tears utilizing the transosseous equivalent technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010, 19:1210-1217. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.03.018.
24. Sugaya H., Maeda K., Matsuki K., Moriishi J. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:953-960. 10.2106/JBJS.F.00512.